Wild are fine trading partners. Just not going to overpay.Maybe the Wild aren't good trading partners then, seems kinda clear based on basically this entire thread.
I'd be shocked if Chevy traded Barlow for Nelson but perhaps having Yager in the system makes that trade easier to make for wpgHe’d be a great fit on the JETS. Technically his hometown of Warroad is closer to Winnipeg than it is to St. Paul MN.
I’d begrudgingly part with Colby Barlow if I had to.
Scheifele - Nelson - Lowry - Namestnikov is pretty solid center depth.
We're in disagreement over what's considered fair value here so we're not fine trading partners. You don't want to offer a even a first for Nelson, that's fine, we'll move on.Wild are fine trading partners. Just not going to overpay.
didnt realize u guys were the gmsWe're in disagreement over what's considered fair value here so we're not fine trading partners. You don't want to offer a even a first for Nelson, that's fine, we'll move on.
As if you speak for the organization - lolWe're in disagreement over what's considered fair value here so we're not fine trading partners. You don't want to offer a even a first for Nelson, that's fine, we'll move on.
They can offer one of their C rate prospects, a cap dump and future considerations since both guys are clearly old and not useful anymore.What about an All In package for both MIN boys, Lee+Nelson
They have Duchene and Wyatt Johnston who can play CWith Seguin down, seems like a good, logical target for the Stars.
I speak as someone who doesn't really need to hear any more about how Minnesota won't offer a first rounder for a rental.As if you speak for the organization - lol
How the eff is that going to work cap-wise?What about an All In package for both MIN boys, Lee+Nelson
It’s not that we cannot offer a 1st, it’s just not the one you want.We're in disagreement over what's considered fair value here so we're not fine trading partners. You don't want to offer an even a first for Nelson, that's fine, we'll move on.
Didn't know you speak for your GM as well...It’s not that we cannot offer a 1st, it’s just not the one you want.
I don’t need to be GM to figure out that the 2025 1st is conditional and therefore the 2026 1st is conditional as well, making them unavailable to offer. Islanders fans being thick skulled about that is amusing.Didn't know you speak for your GM as well...
It’s not that we cannot offer a 1st, it’s just not the one you want.
This year's second and next year second. A whole host of good prospects and intriguing prospects.It's going to tough to acquire a top rental without a tradeable 1st before 2027.