Proposal: DAL & TOR, DAL & FLA, and DAL & PIT (Deadline deals)

[DieselPig]

TOR receives: John Klingberg (50% retained, pending UFA)

DAL receives: 2022 1st rounder, Nicholas Robertson, and Nick Ritchie (1 year left @ 2.5mil)

_______

FLA receives: Joe Pavelski (50% retained, pending UFA), 2022 3rd rounder

DAL receives: 2023 1st rounder, Owen Tippet (pending RFA), and Aleksi Heponiemi (pending RFA)

_______

PIT receives: Alexander Radulov (50% retained, pending UFA)

DAL receives: 2022 2nd rounder

_______

If you're the GM of TOR, FLA, or PIT do you accept these offers from DAL at the trade deadline? Dallas picks up some high draft picks and moves towards a younger lineup, while top contenders add some big pieces of a playoff run. Thoughts?

Click to read more...

 

[Yackiberg8]

No chance from Florida and Toronto.

 

[Adele Dazeem]

Dallas laughs at Toronto's face.

 

[Mersss]

That's like... A LOT for Pavelski...

 

[HugeInTheShire]

No chance Florida pays that much, I also doubt Toronto does that deal... I said yes to the Pittsburg deal though as it makes the most sense

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

Overvaluing your UFA's.

Dallas adds in the Toronto trade 9not a major add, something like Kiviranta should be fine)

Florida is just overpaying by at least Tippet

 

[Kcb12345]

Overvaluing your UFA's.

Dallas adds in the Toronto trade 9not a major add, something like Kiviranta should be fine)

Florida is just overpaying by at least Tippet

Yes you can have Kiviranta for sure. Agreed on Florida. Pavelski is an incredible addition for any team, but no one will give up a 1st + good young forward with top 6 potential for him. A prospect sure

 

[DieselPig]

That's like... A LOT for Pavelski...

Maybe I was overvaluing what teams would pay for him at the deadline. I feel like if he's available teams will be chomping at the bit to add a player of his pedigree and clutchness in big games. Maybe I undervalued Tippett as well, wasn't sure how he is viewed as still a top prospect or questionable to turn into a top 6 player.

 

[nbwingsfan]

Dallas laughs at Toronto's face.

Why? A 1st + B prospect is kind of the standard for top deadline UFAs to be? What exactly do you expect from a guy who 100% won’t re-sign with you?

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

Yes you can have Kiviranta for sure. Agreed on Florida. Pavelski is an incredible addition for any team, but no one will give up a 1st + good young forward with top 6 potential for him. A prospect sure

Im not a leafs fan so probably better to hear from them. On a side note for that trade Ritchie is an extremely cheap buyout so they would probably prefer to move one of Holl/Dermott. I could also see some protection on the 1st like it depends on if Toronto makes the 2nd round or something

 

[HockeyRulez]

No thank you

 

[JA17]

Can Klingberg shutdown top forwards? If not then there is no reason for Toronto to do this trade

 

[Adele Dazeem]

Why? A 1st + B prospect is kind of the standard for top deadline UFAs to be? What exactly do you expect from a guy who 100% won’t re-sign with you?

That package gets you a Coleman type player; Klingberg would be a luxury in Toronto

 

[ToDavid]

I think the Toronto deal is pretty standard as far as high end rentals go, I just don’t think the Leafs go after an offensive defenseman.

 

[nbwingsfan]

That package gets you a Coleman type player; Klingberg would be a luxury in Toronto

Again, how many UFA to be players get more than a 1st + B prospect at the deadline? What do you expect Klingberg to get? Coleman wasn’t a UFA to be and got that return because of his very low cap hit.

 

[Gurglesons]

Not sure PIT would be interested in Radulov. But value is fair.

 

[CheckingLineCenter]

Is Radulov still good?

 

[Adele Dazeem]

Again, how many UFA to be players get more than a 1st + B prospect at the deadline? What do you expect Klingberg to get? Coleman wasn’t a UFA to be and got that return because of his very low cap hit.

I just think you got to do better than Robertson if you're adding Ritchie in the package; even if he has 1 year left.

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

I just think you got to do better than Robertson if you're adding Ritchie in the package; even if he has 1 year left.

Ritchie's cap hit is only relevant because of Toronto's cap situation, if you don't want it then buy him out for a 300k cap hit. That's probably what Toronto will do this offseason anyways

 

[nbwingsfan]

I just think you got to do better than Robertson if you're adding Ritchie in the package; even if he has 1 year left.

Ritchie is solely for Cap purposes and irrelevant to Dallas or their cap, especially retained. When Klingberg ia traded this is exactly the type of return he will get

 

[Dipsy Doodle]

PIT receives: Alexander Radulov (50% retained, pending UFA)

DAL receives: 2022 2nd rounder

Pens wouldn't be interested in Radulov unless it was a bargain. A 2nd ain't a bargain for what he's done this year.

Would be very interested in Pavelski though.

Any interest in Kapanen for Pavelski at 50%?

 

[SEALBound]

Not sure PIT would be interested in Radulov. But value is fair.

Basically this. I imagine we'd need to send salary your way. I'd rather it be something like ZAR+3rd.

I'm anti 1st and 2nds for UFAs.

 

[catters078]

Just a reminder Pavelski is top 10 in points IN THE NHL

I doubt he gets traded. But man hes worth a 1st an premium young player.

 

[letsgrowcactus]

Just a reminder Pavelski is top 10 in points IN THE NHL

I doubt he gets traded. But man hes worth a 1st an premium young player.

He is excellent no doubt. He is also a 37 year old rental and Florida is stacked at forward. If we were going to pay all these assets for a rental (and I really don't think we should), then it would be a young-ish defenseman who may re-sign with us.
It's a bad fit.

 

[David OSullivan]

Yes penguins. Good trade for them. No Florida, pavelski would improve them of course but those are assets they could use on the backend. Toronto should not be giving up their future and going all in.