Were you or were you not wrong about Boo being a #1C?
(You absolutely were)
If we are truly honest and endeavor to be accurate, then no I was not wrong.
What I actually said was:
- some thought he was 4C material, I said
in a vacuum he is 3C material w/2C upside
-however, I also said, NOT in a vacuum, on paper he has extraordinary fit w/Kreider and righty shot Zib, who could/should be moved to 1RW.
I amplified this further saying:
one model for a successful line =
driver of play (here Kreider) + facilitator (Nieves) + finisher/scorer (Zib)
I said therefore, in the limited and restricted context of the above only, yes Boo could =
de facto 1C b'c both Kreider and Zib were and are still clearly first liners. I took pains to emphasize that 1C status was conditional as to that line.
Rangers stupidly did not listen to me, and played Nieves w/McCloud types who were ok for defensive play but a black hole offensively. On two or three busted plays where Boo wound up w/Kreider, he looked good 'carrying the mail' to enable a score.
You and the self proclaimed 'Boo Nieves truther' [like the so called Moral Majority being neither moral nor a majority] like to selectively retell this tale out of context, in an attempt to make me look bad. But once the full truth is recalled, you are the ones who are disgraced.
I will never allow your false representations to remain uncontested.
It is the price of vigilance.
I will address the out of context misrepresentations you and a handful of others like to constantly press in an effort to make me look bad, regardless of the truth of what I actually said, when I get a chance, hopefully this w'e at earliest or shortly thereafter.
This blurb is to repudiate you until then
As explained above.
I will not succumb to the efforts of those who want submission to a herd mentality.
bern will continue to champion free speech and competition of ideas.
Don't like it?
Insert clip from the film where Jack N says "you can't handle the truth".
No one has to try to make you look bad. You do a bang up job.
Good ultimately prevails over evil.
Truth eventually conquers falsehoods.
My efforts to champion truth and free speech do not make me look bad, even if you, like those idiot election deniers, insist to the contrary; your representations are not based on truth.
You lose.
No one needs to press to make you look bad. You do that just fine every time you post anything
See immediately above post.
Waiting anxiously over here to be put in my place
Your wait is over.
This is factually inaccurate, as I don't really ever express interest in NYR assets.
You were NEVER interested in Buchnevich?
Or Georgiev?
Maybe at different prices than what NY board thought it should be, but not all?
Me thinks otherwise.