Prospect Info: (D) Nolan Allan - 2021 32nd Overall

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Dead Meat

Registered User
Apr 27, 2004
635
868
I was very sour on Stan at the time - not many of his defenseman picks hit and then giving up on them early in trades made me skeptical.... I'm still sour on him and wonder what he could've done with the Reichel pick in that draft.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
20,583
17,125
Bomoseen, Vermont
Still think the pick was relatively lower ceiling relative to some of the other options available. It was a weird pick not because he was a bad pick, but because we needed some higher end swings with the roster we had. We weren’t supplementing a contender.
 

ColbyChaos

I am a made up country
Sep 27, 2017
6,496
6,951
Will County
Wasn't Allan projected to be drafted in late 30's thru 50 range?

Not that much of a reach taking him at #32

Also, since being drafted he has won a gold as part of Canada's WJC so it's not like his stock as a prospect has declined since draft. If anything, he is looking more and more worthy of being drafted in 1st round
Alan.png
 

ColbyChaos

I am a made up country
Sep 27, 2017
6,496
6,951
Will County
No idea what the Jones trade has to do with drafting a defenseman at 32. You need six he's not a goalie.
Yes but we traded pick 12 and a future first at the time when this team wasnt close to being a playoff team. Stan felt that the team over performing in 2021 in a division only season meant that they were a jones away from contending which fans knew already there was a lot more work needed to be done
 

Faceboner

Registered User
Jan 6, 2022
1,922
1,319
Yes but we traded pick 12 and a future first at the time when this team wasnt close to being a playoff team. Stan felt that the team over performing in 2021 in a division only season meant that they were a jones away from contending which fans knew already there was a lot more work needed to be done
Who would you guys have picked with that 12th pick though? Looking back so far maybe Zac bolduc would be worth it or sillinger if he turns it around. Jones provides more value on the ice as of now the only thing that makes it close is cap hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swerdnase

belfour30

Connor Bedard Fangirl
Dec 14, 2019
1,707
1,547
Who would you guys have picked with that 12th pick though? Looking back so far maybe Zac bolduc would be worth it or sillinger if he turns it around. Jones provides more value on the ice as of now the only thing that makes it close is cap hit.
I'd still rather have Jiricek than Jones.
Honestly, if they could have NOT traded their 2022 pick and taken back the #32 pick, I think it would have been a more fair trade.

So it would have been #12, 44 and Boqvist. I think that would have been a fair deal.
Honestly, I would have traded Kurashev because that's someone CBJ was interested in rather than the 2022 1st rounder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

WarLax

Registered User
Apr 17, 2016
384
686
I'd still rather have Jiricek than Jones.
Honestly, if they could have NOT traded their 2022 pick and taken back the #32 pick, I think it would have been a more fair trade.

So it would have been #12, 44 and Boqvist. I think that would have been a fair deal.
Honestly, I would have traded Kurashev because that's someone CBJ was interested in rather than the 2022 1st rounder.

Lol, you really think Columbus valued Kurashev (especially at that time) like a first rounder? Just because there were reports they were interested in him, does not mean that they valued him at a first-round pick level from a crap team (hint: they didn't).
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
30,418
19,055
You can't really take the 2021 Draft Ranks too seriously to begin with, that 2020-21 season got completely wrecked with COVID at junior levels.
 

belfour30

Connor Bedard Fangirl
Dec 14, 2019
1,707
1,547
Lol, you really think Columbus valued Kurashev (especially at that time) like a first rounder? Just because there were reports they were interested in him, does not mean that they valued him at a first-round pick level from a crap team (hint: they didn't).
No, but I think Kurashev + #32 might have gotten the job done.

The 2nd 1st was always a massive overpayment.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad