smcgreg
Registered User
I will definitely look into the CP test, if nothing else for the data. Unfortunately, I don't see it as one of the tests on trainerroad. I'll find a way to do it though.
Ahh.. you're just getting your info from trainerroad. Got it. Well, if you're really interested in some deeper info, I'd suggest Allen and Coggan Training and Racing with a Power Meter. It provides the context for where FTP comes from and will give you a deeper understanding of the relationships between your different power/durations. It's a very good read if you''re into this stuff and does a nice job of blending the "scientific" with the more practical side of things. They also talk about CP in there. It's (CP) not terribly complicated, but again, the book will give you some context.
Ex-hockey player at this point. I don't have the time or patience for the 10 or 11pm beer league games anymore. I also much prefer to MTB at this point in my life.
Ahh.. well, for me, with a wife and two kids, plus a professional career and all the other associated "stuff", the only time available to work out is after 10 pm or at 6 am, so, might as well play hockey. Group rides aren't an option and after 20 yr, the trainer got a bit stale.
Well, I wasn't a naturally good athlete growing up. Did martial arts for several years and developed an okay athletic base. When I started powerlifting I could barely squat 225 to parallel (and I had done weight training for several years before that), but after a couple years of box squats and speed work I ended up around 485 @ 181 bodyweight. Currently weigh 164 and my FTP/kg is 3.45. My power curve is a little lopsided though as I can hold 1200 watts for 5 seconds and 800 for 20.
Hmm.. ok. Hard to say without "seeing" the details, but I'll take your word for it. Granted, on the other hand, science would say otherwise The interesting thing about hockey is (well actually a couple things), there is a place for a lot of different physiologies. It's "anaerobic", but you can't play well, or a lot, without some aerobic capacity. So, it lends itself to those who are a mix of both. One might expect the anaerobic capacity to be off the charts for high level hockey players, but in actuality, it's not, and good ones have better aerobic capacity than most expect. Also, since most can't just play anytime, like basketball, for example, focused training can make up for athletic deficiencies to a great extent. I don't know how many people I've heard say "I wasn't a great athlete, but I was "good" at hockey (good being relative). My point is, it sounds like you''re the typical hockey player, not gifted anaerobically, but ok, with some aerobic "talent" that is now translating to MTB.
Ironically, there are a lot of high level hockey players who have taken up triathlon and cycling and do quite well. Dougie Gilmore comes to mind as one who was into triathlon near the end of his career. I know there were other NHLers around the time that were into it as well.