- Nov 17, 2011
- 7,665
- 2,546
Concerning Entertainment Districts:
The Islanders have one, and it is the reason that UBS Center could be built. This is in New York, mind you.
It is not a disgrace for ownership to link a sports team to an entertainment district today. Considering the very high prices one has to pay for on ice talent, and the way the CBA is set up, and the upward pull on HRR from Toronto, Montreal, and the Rangers, it's almost necessary.
The league continues to suffer one elephant in the room:
The income disparity on money from local fans between the top 5 or so teams, and the bottom 10-15 teams, is absolutely huge. And, the ownership of the top revenue teams doesn't want to share more, even though they should.
Continent wide TV contracts having grown enough to make up for it, and the last I knew, the Canadian broadcast contract is likely to be less on the next round.
All of that contributes, and all of it contributes to the Yotes problems. ESPECIALLY, after IA lost their 15m/yr subsidy.
The Islanders have one, and it is the reason that UBS Center could be built. This is in New York, mind you.
It is not a disgrace for ownership to link a sports team to an entertainment district today. Considering the very high prices one has to pay for on ice talent, and the way the CBA is set up, and the upward pull on HRR from Toronto, Montreal, and the Rangers, it's almost necessary.
The league continues to suffer one elephant in the room:
The income disparity on money from local fans between the top 5 or so teams, and the bottom 10-15 teams, is absolutely huge. And, the ownership of the top revenue teams doesn't want to share more, even though they should.
Continent wide TV contracts having grown enough to make up for it, and the last I knew, the Canadian broadcast contract is likely to be less on the next round.
All of that contributes, and all of it contributes to the Yotes problems. ESPECIALLY, after IA lost their 15m/yr subsidy.