Llewzaher
Registered User
Arizona and Utah are in the 4th year of the rebuildArizona/Utah has been rebuilding forever
Armstrong thinks next year they should be able to make the playoffs via wildcard
Arizona and Utah are in the 4th year of the rebuildArizona/Utah has been rebuilding forever
You cant be serious lolArizona and Utah are in the 4th year of the rebuild
Armstrong thinks next year they should be able to make the playoffs via wildcard
Idk if serious...Pens are not in an official rebuild but Kyle Dubas has been a pretty stellar job accumulating picks and prospects..
I would hope it is soon, they are already on year 6 of the rebuild and still a bottom 5 team. Much longer and they will have to start selling off the leaders of this rebuild and start all over again like buffalo.I’ll tell you this, I know they’re not having a great season THIS year but I really think Anaheim is going to have a successful rebuild.
Sens, Sabres, Red Wings, Ducks, Blue Jackets and Blackhawks have all been mired in years of rebuilding and re-setting without landing on a playoff worthy, let alone cup contending core.
Utah, now that they have the ability to keep their assets, the Sharks and the Habs look to be on good trajectories to ice a contender around their respective U25 cores over the next 3-5 years. If they achieve that, those would be pretty successful rebuild timelines
I would hope it is soon, they are already on year 6 of the rebuild and still a bottom 5 team. Much longer and they will have to start selling off the leaders of this rebuild and start all over again like buffalo.
Was sarcasm for comedic effect lmk if it workedlol bruh that is entirely not true
I think the Habs are arguably in the worst shape of the current bottom feedersI would take the U25 core of the Ducks and Jackets over the Habs. The only good center in the Habs org is a 25 year old mid-low #1C, they don't have any U25 centers of note. And only one D with high end traits, who is a bit tiny for playoff hockey.
The Ducks and Jackets are more filled out with high end guys at key positions.
Probably need a better Defenseman than Dickinson, nice guy to add to a mix but probably not going to be a guy that carries an entire D group. If they end up with Schaefer this year, that's huge.I don't know about best, but the SJ rebuild is how you would want to draw it up I would think. Elite #1C (Celebrini), hopefully elite #1D (Dickenson) and a Franchse Goalie in the making (Askarov). Add in their slew of high draft pedigree supporting players all through the system,. You usually want to have those building blocks to really get your team going in the right direction.
Shows the importance of hitting on your picks, as well as getting those high picks in the right draft year, as all first rounders are not created equally.
EDIT: NJ did pretty well on theirs for a lot of the same reasons, although they didn't get the goalie right and it's haunted them for a few years.
No they aren't. They didn't commit to a rebuild until Verbeek's first deadline, shortly after he took over in 2022. That's when they sold off Lindholm/Manson/Rakell, fully committing to the future. They may have been bad before that, but Bob Murray was in denial and had them floating in purgatory still trying to make playoffs.
no one knows how Reinbacher, Guhle or Hage projects yet. Demidov may be tried at C.I would take the U25 core of the Ducks and Jackets over the Habs. The only good center in the Habs org is a 25 year old mid-low #1C, they don't have any U25 centers of note. And only one D with high end traits, who is a bit tiny for playoff hockey.
The Ducks and Jackets are more filled out with high end guys at key positions.
Well he's not a high end 1C when you actually compare him to the upper tier centers of the league. Not sure how calling him a mid tier 1C is insulting, he still called him a 1C regardlessno one knows how Reinbacher, Guhle or Hage projects yet. Demidov may be tried at C.
I wouldn't give up on Dach just yet and habs have like 7 picks in the top 50 next summer.
I would also say a point per game C is better than mid
well since were arguing, I'd say some of the pieces on both those teams haven't proven much yet either. Is LindI think the Habs are arguably in the worst shape of the current bottom feeders
To your point, Suzuki is a low end 1C. They've got no other strength down the middle. Suzuki is also 25. He's not in a rebuilding windows. He's in his prime.
.
Guhle isn't an upper tier 1D. Some pundits think he's actually bound to be a 2nd pair guy. And with Hutson I'll believe it when I see it. He's too small.
They just don't have the elite young talent that other teams do.
They've got some strength on the wings, but there's a reason people don't say "you build from the wings in"