Basically, the three players could not be more different despite all having similar upside. Slafkovsky is a special player with his potential as a playdriving 200 ft winger with size who competes hard and also has exceptional skill. He really lfkes the way he wears down teams with his ability to draw your attention and dish to make goalies and defenders have to constantly shift to keep up. Says that's one of the big things that gets talked about in front offices that doesn't get a lot of public attention.
He thinks Cooley's biggest drawback is hockey sense, and that he's not the cerebral players that Slaf and Wright are, which will ultimately limit his ceiling. He relies on his individual skill, whereas Wright and Slaf can play well in a structure and work with their teammates more. Also points out that Cooley was playing in a system that's basically Harlem Globetrotters on ice, which makes it difficult to compare him to other players.
He spends a lot of timing breaking down what exactly was so worrisome about Wright's most recent season, and offers a very interesting caveat about recent #1 draft picks and how the social media microscope is worse than it's ever been. But he pretty much says to not count him out because he's such a technically gifted passer and shooter.
