Proposal: Crouse (Utah) for Norris+Sogaard (Ottawa)

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    53
  • This poll will close: .

BlueGoose27

Registered User
Sep 6, 2024
33
15
I feel like Norris has zero value at this point. Could be wrong tho
I wouldn’t say zero. It’s because of his injury history. The kid can play, he’s definitely top 6 center when healthy. Having a decent season so far. I mean if I’m Ottawa I take that trade. Sens need to do something
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,715
11,505
If the Sens make a panic/shake-up trade, this would be a decent one... but I hope we can turn it around without doing something like this
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,255
14,783
Kansas City, MO
Sogaard has pretty much no value.

So it’s Crouse for Norris.

I don’t care what the points say - from a team building standpoint, I don’t do that if I’m Utah. I’m not sure why they’d be dying to add Norris at nearly $8 million AAV.

Crouse would be a massive add and a guy who really brings a different energy for Ottawa - I’d be all over this if I were them. Plus you’re opening up cap flexibility.
 

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,810
15,454
If Utah wants to take that contract off the Sens hands, go for it.

Norris got his massive payday because he scored 35 goals in 66 games, largely because of an elite one-timer that the PP was built around.

After his shoulder injuries we haven't seen him unleash a big one-timer all season. Starting to think he can't anymore.

And if he can't shoot like that now, he's not going to live up to that contract.

I'd gladly let Utah have him for free. If Crouse is coming back even better.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad