Crazy rise in scoring the last three years

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,343
6,134
Visit site
THIS. League wide scoring in general has only slightly increased. The thread should really be discussing why it has become so concentrated amongst the very best players. I mean, just look at how the OP was stated - counting 100pt players instead of team average goal rates for the time periods selected to exaggerate this "dramatic" rise in scoring.

EDIT: I would guess that PP efficiency (and ice-time for the #1 units increasing relative to previous time periods as coaches finally figure out that this leads to better PP results overall) and 3v3 OT are 2 of the main reasons the scoring is more localized to the stars.

Fair point.

Here are some more numbers:

Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.74
Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.91 (a 23% difference)

Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.62
Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.71 (a 15% difference)

Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.51
Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.56 (a 10% difference)

So the 15% rise in league GPG can be attributed primarily to the #1 line/1st PP unit forwards leveraging the drop in goalie sv%.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,079
11,140
Fair point.

Here are some more numbers:

Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.74
Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.91 (a 23% difference)

Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.62
Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.71 (a 15% difference)

Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.51
Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.56 (a 10% difference)

So the 15% rise in league GPG can be attributed primarily to the #1 line/1st PP unit forwards leveraging the drop in goalie sv%.

Plus we have players like Kucherov with 15 empty net points in a season which I don’t think was possible 10 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: x Tame Impala

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,251
4,470
You see it on the power plays now. More 4 or even 5 forward power play units. Gone are the days of running the power play through the big slapper from the point.

That isn’t a new tactic though it is an old one that has come back into vogue. It is a change from say 10 years ago though, you’re right.
 

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,358
13,234
Plus we have players like Kucherov with 15 empty net points in a season which I don’t think was possible 10 years ago.
Where do you find your EN point stats? For the life of me I can never easily pull them up.

I knew Kucherov had an obscene amount of EN points I just couldn’t back it up
 

Offtheboard412

Registered User
Feb 26, 2012
760
451
That isn’t a new tactic though it is an old one that has come back into vogue. It is a change from say 10 years ago though, you’re right.
Yeah, everything is cyclical. There's nothing really new, it's just been long enough for the pendulum to swing back that way. Teams will adapt, tactics will change, and we'll be right back where we started in 10 years.
 

sena

Registered User
Jul 3, 2024
27
25
welcome to 80's hockey, small fast skilled D that don't play defense and wide open mistake filled games.
err I mean modern NHL.
 

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,645
7,445
welcome to 80's hockey, small fast skilled D that don't play defense and wide open mistake filled games.
err I mean modern NHL.
The 80s averaged 0.4 to 0.9 goals per game higher than last season depending on which 80s season you look at. Also 1-2 more pp opportunities per game.

Not the same thing IMO.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad