Crazy rise in scoring the last three years

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,490
6,220
Visit site
THIS. League wide scoring in general has only slightly increased. The thread should really be discussing why it has become so concentrated amongst the very best players. I mean, just look at how the OP was stated - counting 100pt players instead of team average goal rates for the time periods selected to exaggerate this "dramatic" rise in scoring.

EDIT: I would guess that PP efficiency (and ice-time for the #1 units increasing relative to previous time periods as coaches finally figure out that this leads to better PP results overall) and 3v3 OT are 2 of the main reasons the scoring is more localized to the stars.

Fair point.

Here are some more numbers:

Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.74
Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.91 (a 23% difference)

Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.62
Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.71 (a 15% difference)

Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.51
Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.56 (a 10% difference)

So the 15% rise in league GPG can be attributed primarily to the #1 line/1st PP unit forwards leveraging the drop in goalie sv%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baaaaaaaaaaaaah

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,342
11,340
Fair point.

Here are some more numbers:

Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.74
Among forwards, the #50 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.91 (a 23% difference)

Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.62
Among forwards, the #100 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.71 (a 15% difference)

Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '14 to '16 was 0.51
Among forwards, the #150 PPG scorer from '22 to '24 was 0.56 (a 10% difference)

So the 15% rise in league GPG can be attributed primarily to the #1 line/1st PP unit forwards leveraging the drop in goalie sv%.

Plus we have players like Kucherov with 15 empty net points in a season which I don’t think was possible 10 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: x Tame Impala

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,343
4,607
You see it on the power plays now. More 4 or even 5 forward power play units. Gone are the days of running the power play through the big slapper from the point.

That isn’t a new tactic though it is an old one that has come back into vogue. It is a change from say 10 years ago though, you’re right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,705
13,716
Plus we have players like Kucherov with 15 empty net points in a season which I don’t think was possible 10 years ago.
Where do you find your EN point stats? For the life of me I can never easily pull them up.

I knew Kucherov had an obscene amount of EN points I just couldn’t back it up
 

Offtheboard412

Registered User
Feb 26, 2012
777
476
That isn’t a new tactic though it is an old one that has come back into vogue. It is a change from say 10 years ago though, you’re right.
Yeah, everything is cyclical. There's nothing really new, it's just been long enough for the pendulum to swing back that way. Teams will adapt, tactics will change, and we'll be right back where we started in 10 years.
 

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,726
7,525
welcome to 80's hockey, small fast skilled D that don't play defense and wide open mistake filled games.
err I mean modern NHL.
The 80s averaged 0.4 to 0.9 goals per game higher than last season depending on which 80s season you look at. Also 1-2 more pp opportunities per game.

Not the same thing IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Video Nasty

sena

Registered User
Jul 3, 2024
134
87
The 80s averaged 0.4 to 0.9 goals per game higher than last season depending on which 80s season you look at. Also 1-2 more pp opportunities per game.

Not the same thing IMO.
look how much better the goalies are today, It is the same
Karlsson winning the Norris is a good example of what passes for defense these days. Everyone skates as fast as they can and throws blind passes to the front of the net, the speed is up but its just pond hockey
 

SnuggaRUDE

Registered User
Apr 5, 2013
9,483
7,007
Empty net goals are up quite a bit. Pre-lockout ENG were around 0.1/g, now they're over 0.2/g. Before the mid 80s they were around 0.04/g.

Power Play scoring is higher than the all time lows in the Pre-War era, but it's still lower than most of the Expansion era.
 

GrkFlyersFan

Registered User
Jul 30, 2011
1,544
572
South Jersey
Robotic, predictable goaltending. The key is defense, though. Things will level off when defenses adjust. It's the way it's always been. Offense evolves, defense catches up. Back to the goaltending, the difference is, the best goalies now aren't as good as the best goalies of yesteryear, BUT the average goalie is most definitely better now. Every starter and even most backups are some kind of good, rarely are you catching a break with the opposing goalie.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
26,342
11,340
Where do you find your EN point stats? For the life of me I can never easily pull them up.

I knew Kucherov had an obscene amount of EN points I just couldn’t back it up

Someone posted them here a while ago and I can’t seem to find them now, I can only find team stats for empty net goals on statsmuse. I’ll find them again and let you know.

Robotic, predictable goaltending. The key is defense, though. Things will level off when defenses adjust. It's the way it's always been. Offense evolves, defense catches up. Back to the goaltending, the difference is, the best goalies now aren't as good as the best goalies of yesteryear, BUT the average goalie is most definitely better now. Every starter and even most backups are some kind of good, rarely are you catching a break with the opposing goalie.

How do we know the best goalies aren’t also better today when they’re facing way better shooters on average and more skilled offensive players all across the board?

Especially with the reductions to goalie equipment I find it hard to believe Shesterkin couldn’t hold his own against the elite goalies of the past.
 
  • Love
Reactions: x Tame Impala

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,490
6,220
Visit site
The first half the 90s were higher scoring than today.

League GPG was significantly higher but the top end scorers were close.

90/91 to 91/92 (League 3.47):

Mario - 1.96 PPG
Wayne - 1.87
Hull - 1.59
Oates - 1.52
Sakic - 1.36
Lafontaine - 1.35

22/23 to 23/24 (League GPG 3.14):

McDavid -1.80
MacKinnon - 1.64
Kucherov - 1.58
Draisaitl - 1.45
Pasternak - 1.36
Rantanen - 1.29
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
25,690
13,678
Physical defense and stickwork is penalized and goalie equipment has been seriously reduced. That explains most of it.
 

JianYang

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
19,457
18,750
The rule enforcements have made it harder to defend.

Do you guys remember the Crosby slash on methot that led to to that gruesome finger incident? I think that was a turning point in the sense that it seems like the nhl started taking a much tougher stance on the hacking and whacking around on the puck carrier's hands. It's a subtle difference to the viewer but it's a massive difference to the puck carrier who has alot more freedom to make plays.

Then you add goalie reductions into the equation, and its no wonder that goals have spiked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,726
7,525
look how much better the goalies are today, It is the same
Karlsson winning the Norris is a good example of what passes for defense these days. Everyone skates as fast as they can and throws blind passes to the front of the net, the speed is up but its just pond hockey
Karlsson winning the Norris is just a symptom of hockey writers giving the Norris to the guy with the most points lately.

A guy like Quinn Hughes wouldn't have won it playing 30 seconds per game on the PK 15 years ago either.
 

WTG

December 5th
Jan 11, 2015
24,409
8,799
Pickle Time Deli & Market
I think it's great! Tickets cost so much and whether people like to admit it or not, goals inheretly make the game funner to watch. It sucks spending like 200+ for two tickets going to a game and the score is like 1-0.
 

Praetorian Caps

Registered User
May 15, 2018
867
1,189
General gist I got from this is advancements in technology; experimental mental technique to make players smarter; smaller goalie equipment; and an overall increase in athleticism has contributed to the increase of skill among today's players.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad