rt
Clean Hits on Substack
They seem to have good chemistry.A 31-year-old Nyquist does nothing for me.
They seem to have good chemistry.A 31-year-old Nyquist does nothing for me.
Everybody demands out of Columbus - lolYep I don’t like the idea of trading for a guy that has a history of demanding his way off of a team. We aren’t exactly in the top 10 of teams players want to join. Imagine Keller becoming a 60 point winger again, or Schmaltz for that matter, and Dubois demanding out in a couple years.
Will this roster be able to score a goal with the goalie pulled at the end of the game or will the 6 on 5 futility reign supreme?
Yeah. I'd like to see this kid on our PP ASAP.Sure wish we could get Logan Brown.
Waiver exempt ain't gonna last forever and will they protect him from the Kraken? He just seems to be a good fit.
They seem to have good chemistry.
Lias Andersson went for a 2nd. Tony DeAngelo went for a 2nd.Does Ottawa see Erik Brannstrom as a downgrade on Soderstrom and by how much? Could it be worth their while to use Brown as leverage to upgrade a prospect?
Have to think Ottawa has enough draft picks, prospects and young roster players.. Arizona doesn't have the players in their prime to offer that make sense but due to Ottawa's depth in those areas they might look to upgrade.. Chabot is getting their main PP time so that takes away from something Brannstrom offers... Personally id CONSIDER an idea of
Brannstrom
Brown
for
Soderstrom
and maybe a decent throw in like Burke/Bunting/Steenbergen
Not sure if Ottawa would consider it but i don't think Arizona has many other reasonable ways to achieve getting Brown in the situation they are in asset wise unless Ottawa is looking to just get something half decent for him at this point (which i'd doubt). I do like the idea of Brown being a 6'6" third line center with offensive potential on the Yotes.
Seriously.Everybody demands out of Columbus - lol
Both draft day trades... teams are more likely to trade a player for a pick when they know someone they want is on the board still... Brown MIGHT be available at next years draft... and I'm not saying they wouldn't potentially do the trade for a second rounder, but since they already have 2 picks next draft and a TON of prospects I personally would want to upgrade players at this point if I were them... Which is why i'd be trying to get PLD if i was Ottawa... I also don't think the Yotes should be trading any picks after having almost none last draftLias Andersson went for a 2nd. Tony DeAngelo went for a 2nd.
Taxi squad
Maybe, but if I'm trading a 1C, I want a proven player or players back. If the trade is expanded, then there may be picks allowed. My opinion of course.IMO you don’t trade away a young center showing early signs of being a true #1C in this league and not expect back a 1st including some other players. I would imagine Columbus thinks they can compete now and want a roster player... but I also think they want some prospects and picks back as well
Sure absolutely. I guess it really depends on where CBJ's GM thinks the team is at. Personally I think if they lose PLD they definitely take a step back and would want at least a 1st and a roster player to fill in for PLD to remain competitive.Maybe, but if I'm trading a 1C, I want a proven player or players back. If the trade is expanded, then there may be picks allowed. My opinion of course.
I feel safe to mention it now, since nothing happened, but I think we had something lined up this week. No idea what it was So maybe something is still in the hopper.
We've made some good pickups. Love Cags. He's all heart.Hope he's healthy. Well worth the chance at the contract. If he isn't healthy, the contract doesn't hurt us. Worth the roll of the dice.
Brassard might be done. No idea. He might be the anti-Stepan: shows up everyday, but doesn't make much difference. But we'd be stupid not to try him at center now that Step's gone and see what we've got. Still a slight chance that this works out extremely well.
I feel like Soderberg would have been worth bringing back at his contract, too, but ... I think there's a good chance Gauthier actually gets regular minutes this year because we're so thin at center. Low event guy, good on faceoffs. Not mean, but at least won't grt pummeled on the boards and constantly knocked around and off the puck.
Even if the Brassard experiment is a bust, I'd rather see Dvo-Hayton-Larsson-Gauthier down the middle than see Schmaltz take a single shift at center tomorrow/ever.
I have no idea why the Yotes think Schmaltz is a C, especially with the same HC. He was tried there in Chicago and also here, with the same results. I would bet my bottom dollar Schmaltz won't be a C for long.I hope Schmaltz gets a long look at center. Like 40 games. Let’s figure out what we have here. There is no downside. What’s the worst that could happen? We lose a bunch of games? That’s going to happen anyway.
I think Schmaltz should be a center. Have you seen him carry the puck through the neutral zone and into the offensive zone? He should be driving the play from the middle. He was born for it. I think the problem has been coaching, first and foremost, and then also his unwillingness to get his hands dirty and play hard enough. His talent says center. His work rate doesn’t support it. He cuts too many corners out there and is infuriatingly prone to floating.I have no idea why the Yotes think Schmaltz is a C, especially with the same HC. He was tried there in Chicago and also here, with the same results. I would bet my bottom dollar Schmaltz won't be a C for long.
No I definitely did not consider Soderstrom a lock to make the roster this year. Next year the door will be wide open for him to secure a spot as almost the entire D core will be moving to free agency.I thought Soderstrom was a lock for the team this season? Has he regressed? He seemed to be a highly touted blue chipper ready to contribute offensively. His showing at the WJC last year was awesome. Thanks in advance.
No I definitely did not consider Soderstrom a lock to make the roster this year. Next year the door will be wide open for him to secure a spot as almost the entire D core will be moving to free agency.
That's the problem. Will he change? Has the same HC. Maybe BA has talked to RT about it, don't know, but I'm not holding my breath. If he does change that makes a big difference for our center strength.I think Schmaltz should be a center. Have you seen him carry the puck through the neutral zone and into the offensive zone? He should be driving the play from the middle. He was born for it. I think the problem has been coaching, first and foremost, and then also his unwillingness to get his hands dirty and play hard enough. His talent says center. His work rate doesn’t support it. He cuts too many corners out there and is infuriatingly prone to floating.
He doesn’t have to be the world’s best defensive center. He doesn’t even have to be particularly good. He just needs to get some f***en giddyup and get back on D and stick check to create some turn overs. He’s got the wheels. I’ve seen him do this intermittently. He’s capable of doing it well. He just doesn’t do it consistently.