Another one who has to bring race into the conversation. Care to explain the white people that are nba fans? Or the huge nba following in China?Not until there are more black players in hockey. A big reason why half the population doesn't watch is because there's nobody who looks like them.
NBA is 70% black yet there’s huge interest from white fans, so I don’t know if that’s necessarily the reasonNot until there are more black players in hockey. A big reason why half the population doesn't watch is because there's nobody who looks like them.
Not until there are more black players in hockey. A big reason why half the population doesn't watch is because there's nobody who looks like them.
Nope. The culture of our game is too conservative to appeal to today’s youth urban culture.
Granted we’ve moved on from the Don Cherry’s of the sport, but that’s not nearly enough.
That doesn't really say anything lmao. On a global scale, Basketball is not that much more relevant than hockey. It probably has a better growth platform though, just because of China.Not a chance. Hockey is tremendously more expensive to play and will pretty much always have a more regional and niche appeal. Basketball is the second most popular sport in the world, I believe (after soccer) and I don't see that changing. That will pretty much always be reflected in the relative popularity of the NHL and NBA.
??? What? It's FAR more relevant. Hockey requires ice, and gear. Basketball requires a hoop.That doesn't really say anything lmao. On a global scale, Basketball is not that much more relevant than hockey. It probably has a better growth platform though, just because of China.
That doesn't really say anything lmao. On a global scale, Basketball is not that much more relevant than hockey. It probably has a better growth platform though, just because of China.
...actually, it says a lot...it says that cheaper sports to play are more popular...it says that Branding matters...take China out and basketball is still probably more popular worldwide...
So? Running requires nothing but your legs, but does that make it a popular sport in the way we are discussing it here???? What? It's FAR more relevant. Hockey requires ice, and gear. Basketball requires a hoop.
My point here was not to really argue about if basketball is bigger than hockey. My point was rather that it matters f*** all if basketball is #2 most popular sport in the world, it might as well be #99 because it's still so much smaller than soccer. It was merely making a wise ass remark on @Summer Rose 's earlier comment....actually, it says a lot...it says that cheaper sports to play are more popular...it says that Branding matters...take China out and basketball is still probably more popular worldwide...
My point here was not to really argue about if basketball is bigger than hockey. My point was rather that it matters f*** all if basketball is #2 most popular sport in the world, it might as well be #99 because it's still so much smaller than soccer. It was merely making a wise ass remark on @Summer Rose 's earlier comment.
Polo might be more expensive...Hockey is also by far the most expensive sport to play...a LOT of kids just don't have the opportunity to play the game cuz it's soo expensive...
So? Running requires nothing but your legs, but does that make it a popular sport in the way we are discussing it here?
My point here was not to really argue about if basketball is bigger than hockey. My point was rather that it matters f*** all if basketball is #2 most popular sport in the world, it might as well be #99 because it's still so much smaller than soccer. It was merely making a wise ass remark on @Summer Rose 's earlier comment.
Fair enough. I’ll admit that the humor was lost on me.![]()