Core Four vs. McDavid or Draisaitl | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Core Four vs. McDavid or Draisaitl

4 losers at 46.6 vs. 2 stars at 26.5 what kind of question is this?

Even assuming Tavares takes a substantial paycut on his next contract due to age, Marner gets about the same (though he'll prolly get a raise in FA) AND McDavid gets a substantial pay raise (he will), the cap difference still favors the Edmonton two to the point where it can't be taken seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedthenorth
The funny thing is the Oilers have the dynamic duo surrounded by a bunch of ex-leaf depth players that are stepping up in the playoffs (Hyman, Brown, Klingberg, Kapanen).

Would be a much different story if the Leafs managed to keep a few of them.
 
Even in the pre-cap world, a successful quartet is two highly skilled forward, one power forward and one legit HOF #1 D. Bossy, Trottier, Gillies, Potvin or Gretzky, Kurri, Messier, Coffee.

The Leafs have it all wrong, the Core 4 are four highly skilled forwards. Oilers have two highly skilled forwards, which is inherently better because they have cap space left over to spread money up and down their lineup. There’s such thing as too much of a good thing. A core three of Quinn Hughes, Hutson and Fox would be a disaster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedthenorth
Core 4 = Matthews, Marner, Rielly, Tavares? :sarcasm:

To be serious, it would hurt to lose Nylander, the other 3 not really.

However, why would the Oilers do that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsQC
Nylander reminds me of Kessel. A guy who generally performs in the playoffs, but isn't someone who can be the #1 guy on a team. But trade him to a team that's already got it's #1 (or #2) and he'll be a huge contributor to that team's Cup run.
You generally don't want a winger as your #1 guy.
 
Core 4 = Matthews, Marner, Rielly, Tavares? :sarcasm:

To be serious, it would hurt to lose Nylander, the other 3 not really.

However, why would the Oilers do that?
They wouldn't; kinda the point and how it speaks to just how inept the Core 4 is in the PO.
 
Even in the pre-cap world, a successful quartet is two highly skilled forward, one power forward and one legit HOF #1 D. Bossy, Trottier, Gillies, Potvin or Gretzky, Kurri, Messier, Coffee.

The Leafs have it all wrong, the Core 4 are four highly skilled forwards. Oilers have two highly skilled forwards, which is inherently better because they have cap space left over to spread money up and down their lineup. There’s such thing as too much of a good thing. A core three of Quinn Hughes, Hutson and Fox would be a disaster.
What about the Big Three in Montreal? Could you put any other forward besides Shutt and Lafleur ahead of them?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad