bernmeister
Registered User
Edit; Didn't realize this thread was so old.
never too old, and the subject is timely/important
your opinion is welcome
Edit; Didn't realize this thread was so old.
Well, a few years back, they used to post in the game threads, links to NY Rangers streams on the internet. Well they did away with posting those links here at HF because they are basically illegal streams. But that doesn't mean they don't still exist. You can get practically anything on the net for free if you know how to search and navigate popups. I am retired and living on a budget and haven't had a cable subscription in many years. But that doesn't stop me from watching whatever I want on the internet. Just FYI.never too old, and the subject is timely/important
your opinion is welcome
Well, a few years back, they used to post in the game threads, links to NY Rangers streams on the internet. Well they did away with posting those links here at HF because they are basically illegal streams. But that doesn't mean they don't still exist. You can get practically anything on the net for free if you know how to search and navigate popups. I am retired and living on a budget and haven't had a cable subscription in many years. But that doesn't stop me from watching whatever I want on the internet. Just FYI.
Theoretically implies lack of evidence. In this example, the evidence is abundant.thanks for the share
your reminder as to what is theoretically possible is appreciated.
Any coincidence there in that is was once the Atlanta Flames? Calgary connection? Has to be, right?I tried NHL.tv about 4 years ago. The Rangers were playing in Calgary (I live in Atlanta) and it wasn't considered an out of market game. I lost my ****.
anyone know if the new Peacock app from nbc will cover games? There is live streaming on the app and a portion of the app is free
I have msg through my Spectrum subscription and I downloaded the MSGGO APP on my iPhone and it works. I even are able to watch games when I am using Verizon LTE and hotel WiFi when I am traveling.I tried to use airplay to stream MSG GO app from my iPad to Apple TV and only audio would work, no picture.
IMO the NHL should have a rule that all teams MUST put at least 10% of their games on free over the air broadcast TVIt is good we keep this thread to keep track of what existing options are
BUT
we need to organize and impress on our elected officials that we need for the manufacturers, the teams, to make broadcast of games available DIRECTLY to the consumer.
Sure, if Fubo or this one or that one or the other one can work together a volume deal, and everybody wins, fine.
But forget otherwise, EVEN STILL, I want my freedom.
I want the ability to be sure to have access to purchase content directly at a reasonable #.
I want FUBO and everybody else to capitulate and it only takes local leaders giving enough pressure on the teams and the league to do the right thing.
IMO the NHL should have a rule that all teams MUST put at least 10% of their games on free over the air broadcast TV
That would grow the fan base more than anything
If you're so inclined, you can set up any video feed to pipe into another system like a tivo and then use that system to pause/FFW/RewindSure would be nice if another streaming service added MSG before the start of next season. I canceled cable back in June and haven't missed it for a second. That said, I did try the free 7 day Fubo trial through my Roku during the play in round...it got the job done, but it isn't anywhere close to watching on cable just yet. The DVR and fast forward is really wonky.
I get what you are saying, but if you wanted to subscibe directly to MSG without any kind of cable subsciption, you would likely be charged a lot more than what you deem reasonable. They would have to charge a lot more than you think to make it profitable. By allowing consumers to order direct, the middle man (spectrum, directv, etc) is going to pay a lot less as they know they will lose customers.It is good we keep this thread to keep track of what existing options are
BUT
we need to organize and impress on our elected officials that we need for the manufacturers, the teams, to make broadcast of games available DIRECTLY to the consumer.
Sure, if Fubo or this one or that one or the other one can work together a volume deal, and everybody wins, fine.
But forget otherwise, EVEN STILL, I want my freedom.
I want the ability to be sure to have access to purchase content directly at a reasonable #.
I want FUBO and everybody else to capitulate and it only takes local leaders giving enough pressure on the teams and the league to do the right thing.
I get what you are saying, but if you wanted to subscibe directly to MSG without any kind of cable subsciption, you would likely be charged a lot more than what you deem reasonable. They would have to charge a lot more than you think to make it profitable. By allowing consumers to order direct, the middle man (spectrum, directv, etc) is going to pay a lot less as they know they will lose customers.
Yes, but MSG gets paid by companies like Spectrum for people who get MSG as part of their package, but never watch it. Those people are not going to subscribe to MSG on its own through Roku, firestick, etc. The bread and butter right now for companies like Spectrum are the live local sports. They know they would take a beating if they lost the exclusivity to that and will pay MSG, SNY, YES, what they need to to keep it.Not sure I agree/follow.
Currently all programming must go through cable (spectrum, etc) or streaming (atm Fubo only) or few other options.
On the other hand, if MSG where made available directly regardless of platform, i.e., its own cable, though that I could see being unwieldy OR its own streaming (yes!) that I see as a win win.
I am sure just as my amazon firestick has apps for this, that and a whole lotta other stuff, I am sure an MSG channel [or more correctly, multiple MSG channels through/under an MSG app] would get Dolan most of the NYK/NYR fan base and its viewership.
No prob to cut out the middleman, Dolan takes lion's share, cost to us reduced. Fubo and Spectrum etc supposedly have to charge less b'c they either don't have or are competing vs MSG Network for the programming.
The x factor here is what level volume discount MSG gives.
But there are a lot of variables in that equation.
Yes, but MSG gets paid by companies like Spectrum for people who get MSG as part of their package, but never watch it. Those people are not going to subscribe to MSG on its own through Roku, firestick, etc. The bread and butter right now for companies like Spectrum are the live local sports. They know they would take a beating if they lost the exclusivity to that and will pay MSG, SNY, YES, what they need to to keep it.