Cont'd - NHL makes 12-year/$5.2 billion Canadian TV deal w/ Sportsnet, CBC, TSN out

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marc the Habs Fan

Moderator
Nov 30, 2002
99,874
11,714
Longueuil
If I understand this correctly Rogers/CBC/TVA have the right to 22 regular season games and all the playoffs games for Montreal starting next year.

The Habs regional deal is up this season with RDS/TSN, So that games what they have up for sale is the 60 regular season games and preseason games only?

Can someone please let me know if I understand this right.

Going to be interesting then, I believe all of other Canada's team have a deal in place long term for regional games, so does RDS/TSN go all out to at least get that deal or not even bother.

Correct for the 60 Habs games on the french side. Right now, no one owns them. You can be RDS is going to all out to keep them. They are virtually nothing without NHL.

Not sure about the TSN/Habs regional contract though.
 

Hemlor

Registered User
Jan 27, 2007
759
0
Must be shock at TSN - and some tears. Supposedly TSN and the CBC lost money on the last deal. Not sure how Sportsnet will make money on this one. There is only so much hockey you can watch before it gets old.

For me, I hope they lose their shirt.

the difference may be that they will own all platforms to deliver the content
 

puckguy11

This Space for Rent
Jan 31, 2010
2,202
0
Somewhere in MN
Sportsnet has always been second-rate compared to the other two, that's my opinion. If they were hockey teams, CBC would be the Penguins - they have the big stars but have to compromise on depth. TSN would be the Bruins - top to bottom they are as solid as can be. And Sportsnet...Sportsnet would be the Leafs, not very good and not much success but you have to hear about it all the time whenever they do anything, because they have the cash (also because they kinda own the Leafs).

The analogy I saw today to best describe the situation was this:

Rogers just bought a lobster dinner with all the fixings for a dinner party. They still have to replace the paper plates for fine china, but that's next on a very long shopping list.

In other words, this is day one in late November 2013. Rogers take control in mid-September 2014, so they still have plenty of time to get their ducks in a row.
 

Avs_19

Registered User
Jun 28, 2007
85,747
34,522
I really worry about the draft coverage going forward. TSN has done such a great job there. McKenzie is obviously good and even though they take a lot of heat here, I think Button and McGuire are also very good when it comes to the draft.

Sportsnet's draft coverage hasn't been good. They need to bring in some new people and really beef that up if we're going to get anywhere close to the kind of analysis TSN provided on draft day. TSN will still do their draft previews and recap but the pick by pick analysis won't be there.
 

madhi19

Just the tip!
Jun 2, 2012
4,408
258
Cold and Dark place!
twitter.com
Correct for the 60 Habs games on the french side. Right now, no one owns them. You can be RDS is going to all out to keep them. They are virtually nothing without NHL.

Not sure about the TSN/Habs regional contract though.
TSN/RDS will either double down or say screw it we ain't putting a dime anymore. The CBC side of the deal look a lot like how the SRC (French CBC) was eased out of the Hockey business.
 

Habsawce

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
31,307
2,614
Canada
Rogers losing money on this deal = higher communication service prices which will inflate the market for all Canadians. Monopolies are tiresome.
 

Hibachi

Registered User
Oct 22, 2013
748
0
I don't know if its been said, but TSN still holds regional rights to the Leafs for the next 2 years, and Jets longer I believe.

So TSN gets maybe 15-20ish home games for the Leafs for the next 2 years.
 

gokeefe

Registered User
Dec 16, 2010
54
0
Edmonton
NHL GCL becomes pretty obsolete now, doesn't it?

On the contrary, with the regional blackouts going away this might be the fall of the last wall stopping me from cancelling cable and going streaming/downloading only for my TV needs. The only thing that was keeping me from cancelling cable was the lack of quality/legal live sports options. If I can just subscribe to GCL without fear of regional blackouts, cable can kiss my ...
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,909
10,777
Nope. Rogers has exclusive national rights to all NHL games. NBC can't show games to Canadian viewers directly, nor could TSN simply pick up an NBC feed and televise it to Canadian viewers.

Thanks for the answer. Why is that, though? TSN already picks up NBC feeds and televises them to Canadian viewers. Are they able to only because they, themselves, have a license for now? Where would the enforcement be coming from, starting in 2014-15? If TSN were to televise NBC feeds, who would step in to put an end to it... the NHL, because it violates the terms of NBC's deal; the Canadian government, because of a protectionist, "keep American companies out" attitude and guarantee of monopoly to Canadian companies; or is it something else?

Regardless of who won the bid, it would be a monopoly.

That's because the bidding was set for the whole enchilada. It didn't need to be that way. If they'd wanted to, the NHL could've portioned it out, asking for different bids for different portions and ensuring that their product would be seen on a wide range of networks. Instead, they chose to put everything up to the single highest bidder.
 

TheFactor

Johnny Malkin
Mar 25, 2011
2,214
225
Calgary
I really worry about the draft coverage going forward. TSN has done such a great job there. McKenzie is obviously good and even though they take a lot of heat here, I think Button and McGuire are also very good when it comes to the draft.

Sportsnet's draft coverage hasn't been good. They need to bring in some new people and really beef that up if we're going to get anywhere close to the kind of analysis TSN provided on draft day. TSN will still do their draft previews and recap but the pick by pick analysis won't be there.

Yeah i know what you mean. I can't take the guys on Sportnets seriously aside from Kypreous. If they get Elliote Friedman (who does hockey central with them I believe) on board for the drafts and free agent frenzy stuff then I think their credibility will certainly increase and I'd have no problem watching their programs. If they keep the same personnel, then free agency and draft days will be nothing special.
 

Gotaf7

Registered User
Nov 6, 2011
2,605
2,602
What are the chances of Quebec getting their team back with TVA involved?
 

Thucydides

Registered User
Dec 24, 2009
8,164
851
No more Bobby Mac? Crying shame.

Sportsnet is a joke, along with all their on-air personalities. Bunch of schmucks. Didn't they bring on Ekland one year, and he completely bombed the trade deadline, confirming all these deals that never ended up going through.

Yeah, that's Sportsnet.

I hope this fails big time.
 

Beukeboom Fan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
16,141
2,097
Chicago, IL
Visit site
wait, was CBC paying 125m a year? EDIT: yup, they are. I didn't realize it was that much. And SN is paying about 10x more than what TSN was paying.

SN is paying 10x what TSN was paying, but they are getting the ability to sell all of the advertising that CBC previously had as part of HNIC.

To put it another way, SN got pretty much the WHOLE pie. CBC still will have HNIC games for the next 4 years, but they get no revenue for doing so. So the consumer won't notice a difference (hopefully), but the economics are really different. The long and the short of is that the NHL was probably getting between $160-200M for the Canadian TV rights under the old agreement, and are now getting an average of $440M per year.
 

Habsawce

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
31,307
2,614
Canada
That would be nice...it's not saving me all of the cost but hopefully some savings going forward.

Sportsnet is said to now have a major influence on scheduling so if they create a smaller CI package they're going to just schedule Canadian teams on Tues/Thurs when they're blacked out so if you're out of market you'll need it to see games.

Honestly, odds are people just stream more in the long run and Sportsnet loses a lot of money and we all lose.

With a monopoly they can be as corrupt and money hungry as they want and there is absolutely no one to keep them in check except for a spineless CRTC that allowed CBC to sign a deal that brings them zero revenue. CBC makes half their revenue off HNIC, so now tax payers will have to put more into that crown corp to keep it alive because Rogers sure as **** isn't going to
 

MaskedSonja

Registered User
Feb 3, 2007
6,550
90
Formerly Tinalera
TSN isnt going to disappear off the map. Regionally, they will have 26 Leafs games a year starting in 2015.

http://www.cp24.com/news/tsn-retains-regional-rights-in-new-nhl-deal-1.1561108

Okay, I wondered about that-they still have regionals. Still though, for a network that was to be focussed on Sports, over the past few years became very "NHL-centric" IMO, it seemed like a "NHL first all other sports second"-with this massive loss of games, there's going to be some shuffling now as they will probably focus more towards a "all sports" channel again.
 

oiLowe

Registered User
Jan 14, 2009
756
16
Calgree
Has SN announced anything about their needed production upgrades?

Surely this question should have been asked by somebody by now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad