Connor McDavid vs Cale Makar | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Connor McDavid vs Cale Makar

Who Is the More Valuable Player?

  • Cale Makar

    Votes: 31 16.1%
  • Connor McDavid

    Votes: 162 83.9%

  • Total voters
    193
Status
Not open for further replies.

TheRarestDangles

Registered User
Oct 1, 2019
1,500
2,613
Denver, Colorado, USA, Earth
So the question of this poll is: who is inherently more valuable? Cale seems to be the best defenseman in the league and McDavid is the best forward, so who--in a hypothetical sense--holds greater value in your eyes? Value is another way of saying 'who is better', but is also an assessment of age, contracts, positional importance, career achievements to this point, intangibles, and all the rest. I look forward to a constructive and civil discussion on this one.
 
By the time David Quinn is done with San Jose, there will be a third option on this poll
 
I honestly almost started this same poll this morning - but was going to add a caveat of "you get Makar at 50% retention", so half his salary, to make it closer.

If you take them as is - it's definitely McDavid. You need to handicap Makar to make it close.

In Makar's defense - I think he's #2 in the league for valuable asset. But, still easily behind McDavid.

hmmm gretzky vs orr? tough call hahahaha

Well, no. It's more like Crosby vs Karlsson. And you take Crosby, no questions asked.
 
I don’t think the differences outside of their ability are enough to be major factors, which means it’s McDavid since he’s the better player. The salary cap difference is 3.5 million, which sounds like a lot but for the best of the best you pay what it takes. I don’t think the difference is large enough to be relevant. Meanwhile Makar is only less than 2 years younger, it’s and his contract only runs for an extra year before he’s a UFA. Those aren’t significant differences.
 
Still McDavid. His competition comes and goes, but he's always there among the best of the best.
 
Makar's become overrated after the Avs won the cup. We wouldn't have so many Makar threads if he had played for a less succesful team with less star forwards in front of him or Toews next to him.

He didn't even receive the most 1st place votes for the Norris this year but we're already at "he's dethroned McDavid by now"??
 
It's just about that time.

clock-cartoon-unlocked-padlock-table-vector-illustration-129135014.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: North Cole
Cale Makar is 23 years old and is locked into a 9 million per year contract until he is 28.

I get that McJesus cannot be touched in terms of best player but surely Makar's contract and age raise his value in comparison to McDavid.
 
McDavid is the better player.

I’d rather start a team w/ Makar. Just easier to find other good centers rather than a 23 year old Norris level defender (that can play 30 min a night and score 25 goals).
 
Cale Makar is 23 years old and is locked into a 9 million per year contract until he is 28.

I get that McJesus cannot be touched in terms of best player but surely Makar's contract and age raise his value in comparison to McDavid.
I mean, McDavid is up in 4 years, so you get 1 extra year for Makar? I mean if it was like 6 year vs 1 year of control sure but...
 
Cale Makar is 23 years old and is locked into a 9 million per year contract until he is 28.

I get that McJesus cannot be touched in terms of best player but surely Makar's contract and age raise his value in comparison to McDavid.
McDavid is less than 2 years older than Makar. It just doesn't feel like it because McDavid won his first Hart trophy 5 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad