The players you listed all have zone starts worse than that and post positive corsi stats. You're comparing him to Coleman, Pageau and Danault.
I don't think you understand what relative corsi is. If you did, you would realize it's not helping to tell the story you think it is. It means he's 1.6% worse than the rest of his teammates.
lol, again our conversation can't really go any farther. We can try if you want but it won't result in anything. I will keep posting for the benefit of people wanting to get informed on Connor Brown. Everything is written in the post but I was still editing so maybe you missed a bit of info
dZS% + QoT + QoC + which team they play for
Danault played with Tatar and Gallagher, 0.7 CF% rel despite less dZS%, better linemates, etc
And I mean, Danault is considered one of the best defensive players in the league...
Now look at Pageau, similar dZS% + QoT + QoC (although he had the luxury to play with Mark Stone) and his CF% rel is (edit : MINUS) - 4.8 in Ottawa... while the team was MUCH better than during Brown's time in Ottawa
I also did NOT compare Brown with Danault and Pageau, I simply said these guys are also considered as "3rd liners" by plenty of fans. But it just doesn't work like that internally in pro hockey teams.
"
he's 1.6% worse than the rest of his teammates" because he starts his shifts 2/3 of the time in the defensive zone (F/o, on the fly, etc) and his MISSION is to shut down the best hockey players in the world. Even with limited hockey knowledge, it's pretty easy to understand... Like I said, conversation has stagnated
you keep on calling him a third liner yet he's paced 50+ for last 2 seasons. Seems like your the one who's undervaluing him.
He was 3rd liner on the leafs. On the sens he's become a good defensive player with 50 point potential.
And you keep on missing the point that both pageau/folgno were traded at the deadline. brown has term. he's just not a rental.
It's pretty basic but I think now everyone understands that "
3rd liners" don't pace for 50+ pts. Even he should be able to understand despite limited understanding. So maybe it's just intellectual dishonesty or "scared" to lose an argument on the internet