I need a reality check? No I don't think I do.
Plenty of teams have 4.45M cap or more; Dallas, Nashville, Columbus (yes they do), Boston, Florida, St. Louis, NYR, and Winnipeg. I didnt even include the bottom feeder teams.
Then there are teams that would move an overpaid vet out with 1 year remaining to make the cap space for a Killorn caliber player.
Who exactly is "Team X?" are you talking about when the Rangers paid to move Marc Staal? You realize Staal is hardly NHL caliber right? Killorn is a top 6 winger on nearly every NHL team in the league. His contract is more than fair and 3 years works out perfectly with the next cap raise.
your reply wasn’t to me but I’d like to point out you are leaving out key RFAs to make that list work
columbus has 9 mil to sign PLD, let’s say PLD gets 6? Seems relatively conservative they are left with 3 mil or close to it, I doubt they have interest in going into the season with no cap space
Boston has 6.6 it’s Debrusk to sign, so they’ll had anywhere between 3-1 mil in space
Dallas, I know your post was before Hintz’s contract but that’s something you should have seen coming and falls in line with the other examples, they have 200K cap space
Nashville is the first realistic option on this list
Florida has some room as well
blues have literally no cap space
Rangers have just enough 4.8 but A) why use it all on Killorn and B) have several key RFAs in next two years which Killorn will take up space during
Jets also have no cap space
TLDR
your list isn’t accurate only Nashville or Florida could fit him without making moves detrimental to their roster, otherwise it’s a bottom feeder who isn’t goin to be in the market to give up assets to take on a 30+ year old forward
your options are quite limited in that sense which in theory drives up the price to unload him not drive up his trade value in a positive sense