It was time, but I hate to see so many negative comments about him. I don't say this very often, but most people are truly clueless.
- People crap on him for making the playoffs 5/10 full seasons he was there. I mean, he took over a team that made the playoffs once in 14 years.
- 4 years in to his tenure the Jackets had their franchise best regular season, which included a 16-game winning streak. The team wasn't projected to be anything special. Torts won the Jack Adams.
- Team made the playoffs 4 years in a row, and people say the culture wasn't great? Okay.
- Their playoff record isn't great, but they had to play the eventual cup champions 4/5 times, so no one else beat those teams either. They did however beat the, at the time, record setting Bolts in a sweep.
- He wasn't afraid of making big moves like bringing in Gaborik, Panarin and Gaudreau, which was much needed for a franchise that was notorious for having little to no star power, and was often in on many others. Some worked out, some didn't, but at least he legitimately tried.
- Lots of bad luck. Horton coming off of a monster playoffs had to retire early due to a back injury that wasn't properly diagnosed until a season after he was signed. Both Johansen and Dubois had attitude problems and wanted to play somewhere else. And after hitting their peak, some of their best players jumped ship that had nothing to do with the team.
- He brought in much scouting experience and passed on a consensus #3 pick like Puljujarvi despite the Finnish connection. He didn't butcher any of this top 10 picks. Fantilli, Johnson and Jiricek are all going to be good players, and Werenski is still their #1 dman.
Like... you go down the list and there was a reason he lasted for a decade. Things slowly went off rails after that disaster summer of 2020, but yeah, it's not an easy job over there. You don't hear star players say it's been their life-long dream to play in Columbus, and their reputation as a franchise was in the gutter when he started. Completely turning that around wasn't a simple task. Unfortunately it didn't last, but I don't put it all on him.
Obviously in 10 years you're bound to make mistakes. And like I said, it was time. But he's not even close to one of the worst GM's you've ever seen like some people here say. It's easy to have that narrative now to due to the Babcock fiasco and teams performance, but everything was fine a few years ago. Having the last years define an entire decade is asinine.
YES. THANK YOU. You get a cookie.It was time, but I hate to see so many negative comments about him. I don't say this very often, but most people are truly clueless.
- People crap on him for making the playoffs 5/10 full seasons he was there. I mean, he took over a team that made the playoffs once in 14 years.
- 4 years in to his tenure the Jackets had their franchise best regular season, which included a 16-game winning streak. Torts won the Jack Adams.
- Team made the playoffs 4 years in a row, and people say the culture wasn't great? Okay.
- Their playoff record isn't great, but they had to play the eventual cup champions 4/5 years, so no one else beat those teams either.. almost 5/5 as the Bruins went to game 7 of the finals. They did however beat the, at the time, record setting Bolts in a sweep. Lifelong memories for any Jackets fan.
- He wasn't afraid of making big moves like bringing in Gaborik, Panarin and Gaudreau, which was much needed for a franchise that was notorious for having little to no star power, and he was often in on many others. Some worked out, some didn't, but at least he legitimately tried.
- Lots of bad luck. Horton coming off of a monster playoffs had to retire early due to a back injury that wasn't properly diagnosed until a season after he was signed. Both Johansen and Dubois had attitude problems and wanted to play somewhere else. And after hitting their peak, some of their best players jumped ship that had nothing to do with the team.
- He brought in much scouting experience and passed on a consensus #3 pick Puljujarvi despite the Finnish connection. He didn't butcher any of this top 10 picks. Fantilli, Johnson and Jiricek are all going to be good players, and Werenski is still their #1 dman.
You go down the list and there was a reason he lasted for a decade. Things slowly went off rails after that disaster summer of 2020, but yeah, it's not an easy job over there. You don't hear star players say it's been their life-long dream to play in Columbus, and their reputation as a franchise was in the gutter when he started. Completely turning that around wasn't a simple task. Players signed with the Jackets a few years ago because they wanted to win the cup, that tells you how much things changed. Unfortunately it didn't last, but I don't put it all on Jarmo.
Obviously in 10 years you're bound to make mistakes. And like I said, it was time. But he's not even close to one of the worst GM's you've ever seen like some people here say. It's easy to have that narrative now to due to the Babcock fiasco and teams performance, but everything was fine a few years ago. Having the last years define an entire tenure is asinine.
At the end of the day, he spent 14 years in the NHL as a scout/assistant manager, went to the KHL to manage team for 3 years and then became the first european GM in the League's history, and had some success doing it. He earned that right. I have a lot of respect for the guy.
It was time, but I hate to see so many negative comments about him. I don't say this very often, but most people are truly clueless.
- People crap on him for making the playoffs 5/10 full seasons he was there. I mean, he took over a team that made the playoffs once in 14 years.
- 4 years in to his tenure the Jackets had their franchise best regular season, which included a 16-game winning streak. Torts won the Jack Adams.
- Team made the playoffs 4 years in a row, and people say the culture wasn't great? Okay.
- Their playoff record isn't great, but they had to play the eventual cup champions 4/5 years, so no one else beat those teams either.. almost 5/5 as the Bruins went to game 7 of the finals. They did however beat the, at the time, record setting Bolts in a sweep. Lifelong memories for any Jackets fan.
- He wasn't afraid of making big moves like bringing in Gaborik, Panarin and Gaudreau, which was much needed for a franchise that was notorious for having little to no star power, and he was often in on many others. Some worked out, some didn't, but at least he legitimately tried.
- Lots of bad luck. Horton coming off of a monster playoffs had to retire early due to a back injury that wasn't properly diagnosed until a season after he was signed. Both Johansen and Dubois had attitude problems and wanted to play somewhere else. And after hitting their peak, some of their best players jumped ship that had nothing to do with the team.
- He brought in much scouting experience and passed on a consensus #3 pick Puljujarvi despite the Finnish connection. He didn't butcher any of this top 10 picks. Fantilli, Johnson and Jiricek are all going to be good players, and Werenski is still their #1 dman.
You go down the list and there was a reason he lasted for a decade. Things slowly went off rails after that disaster summer of 2020, but yeah, it's not an easy job over there. You don't hear star players say it's been their life-long dream to play in Columbus, and their reputation as a franchise was in the gutter when he started. Completely turning that around wasn't a simple task. Players signed with the Jackets a few years ago because they wanted to win the cup, that tells you how much things changed. Unfortunately it didn't last, but I don't put it all on Jarmo.
Obviously in 10 years you're bound to make mistakes. And like I said, it was time. But he's not even close to one of the worst GM's you've ever seen like some people here say. It's easy to have that narrative now to due to the Babcock fiasco and teams performance, but everything was fine a few years ago. Having the last years define an entire tenure is asinine.
At the end of the day, he spent 14 years in the NHL as a scout/assistant manager, went to the KHL to manage team for 3 years and then became the first european GM in the League's history, and had some success doing it. He earned that right. I have a lot of respect for the guy.
He also signed Gudbranson to 4x4Perfectly said. I don't understand all the criticism. Yea, in hindsight hiring Babcock was a mistake and no GM is perfect, but Jarmo drafted very well and made some key trades. It's not his fault Panarin didn't want play anywhere but NYC or that Bob wanted to live in Florida. He also convinced Gaudreau to sign there, that's no easy task.
If Gaudreau would be putting up 100 points a year no-one would bat an eye at that. They were considered a package deal many people suspect.He also signed Gudbranson to 4x4
I don't follow the team closely at all, but just a couple of seasons ago, this guy was nominated for GM of the year if I remember?
Seemed to be very well respected etc
In a nutshell, what happened guys?
Will he get rehired any time soon?
Stay away from Gorton!
Sounds like a deal. I like what we're building here. You guys are also building something pretty cool so I hope you get a good GM.Yeah you gotta make sure the guy who gave away JT Miller and McDonagh and burned high picks on Lias Andersson, Vitali Kravtsov, Kakko, and Lafreniere, doesn't get poached.
If the Habs can make sure the Jackets can't talk to Gorton, that would make me pleased as a Jackets fan.
Even as a package deal with Gaudreau putting up 100 points, that contract for Gudbranson is brutal and only going to get worse.If Gaudreau would be putting up 100 points a year no-one would bat an eye at that. They were considered a package deal many people suspect.
Well put.Perfectly said. I don't understand all the criticism. Yea, in hindsight hiring Babcock was a mistake and no GM is perfect, but Jarmo drafted very well and made some key trades. It's not his fault Panarin didn't want play anywhere but NYC or that Bob wanted to live in Florida. He also convinced Gaudreau to sign there, that's no easy task.
I think he'd be well in a bigger market with more resources and more player appeal. IMO he will be a GM again at some point.
Sure. But my point is this: let's assume Gudbranson and Gaudreau are joined to the hip. If Gaudreau would perform, you could accept that Gudbranson contract. At least in the position of Columbus, where that signing was more about just the stats and cap hit.Even as a package deal with Gaudreau putting up 100 points, that contract for Gudbranson is brutal and only going to get worse.
That’s how the landed on Doug MacLean at the outset. How’d that work out?The Blue Jackets ownership group needs to do what some NFL teams have done.
Call the league office. Admit you have absolutely no idea what you’re doing. You don’t know how to hire a good GM. You don’t even know how to hire a good person who hires the other people. Like a president of hockey operations. You get their input and a list of people and you start from there.
And if that doesn’t work. You sell the team because you’re incompetent.
All of these things ALWAYS reflect on ownership. This organization returning to bottom feeder status - AGAIN - reflects on ownership who doesn’t know what they’re doing.
This is a good post with a lot more context to the path and competition in the PO’s that the Jackets were facing. They’ve faced a lot of great teams right at the start. Blaming JK for not beating those powerhouses that went on to winning the cup is almost silly. He’s obviously done a lot of good things and then bad decisions as well, but for me the last coaching hires and the Babs debacle are the only egregious ones that have nailed his shelf life in the org to an end. The guy is competent.Ignoring the fact that Columbus won 2 series, the 2nd being in 2020: when people say things like this, it's factual but it's also a lazy comment.
Which of the 5 playoff series that the Blue Jackets lost under Kekalainen should they have won?
* 2014 - 2nd time ever in the playoffs, lost to Pittsburgh who won the Metropolitan with 109 points
* 2017 - lost to Pittsburgh, who went on to win the Cup
* 2018 - lost to Washington, who went on to win the Cup
* 2019 - lost to Boston, who went to Game 7 of the Finals
* 2020 - lost to Tampa Bay, who went on to win the Cup
Or: which of the years that the Blue Jackets didn't make the playoffs should they have (a) made the playoffs, and then (b) won a series once there? They never had (and have never had, in franchise history) a record such that they started a series with home ice advantage, and 3 of the 4 years they lost to the eventual Cup champions. What were the reasonable expectations for their postseason performance given their regular season performances and their initial playoff matchups?
I'm not even asking for moves that Kekalainen should have made to help Columbus win series - because, that's presupposes anyone knows what moves those should have been and they absolutely, without question, resulted in a more favorable outcome. I'm just asking for reasonable answers to why they should have won more series, not even asking how that would change the decision announced this morning.
Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
There's not a crying emojiThat’s how the landed on Doug MacLean at the outset. How’d that work out?