There's no reason to raid each other, and they stand on opposite sides of a philosophical debate on the role of athletics. So Big Z said some very accurate things: Big Ten is only taking an AAU or near-AAU member. And most the SEC isn't. IF the Big Ten added anyone from the SEC, ever, it would be Texas. And that's probably the end of the list.
Fans demanded that it become Darwinian capitalism buy their a. Lack of outrage over coaching salaries b. Demanded programs to spend money they don’t have so they can get recruits and c. Continue to watch it which in turn empowered fox and ESPN.
That's a complete break from reality. You and I both know that raging capitalism WITHOUT RESTRAINT is really bad for the "noble pursuit" of sports and competition. We don't WANT ads on jerseys, we don't LIKE corporate named stadiums and sponsorships. We don't like excessive financial disparity that ruins competition.
But if you're a realist, you know that race cars have sponsors because SOMEONE'S gotta pay for "all this."
The question really is "what can be done to provide restraints?" And unfortunately, that ship has sailed. Say what you will about my takes, but I'm consistent: I think more revenue sharing helps pro sports leagues, and college football and basketball NOW is what you get when there's NONE.
The only way to "Fix" what college sports has become is with a time-machine. You need to go back to 1983 and avoid NCAA vs Oklahoma by having the NCAA sell the TV rights to the schools for 50% of the sale price, then share that equally to create revenue sharing. And while you're there, you put an ironclad rule in that states conferences MUST PLAY a full round-robin or double-round robin schedule in every sport, not to take more than 75% of the team schedule. That would cap conferences at 10 members and avoid expanding for TV dollars.