Source?he decided to delay signing in order to try and squeeze more money out the Jets
Source?he decided to delay signing in order to try and squeeze more money out the Jets
No one is saying "Cole can do no wrong".It's the way it works around here with favorites
Cole can do nonwrong with some posters, while the same guys pin the JFK assassination on Stanley
That said, i think that there are also some folks being overly critical of Cole - probably at least partially as an unintended consequence of his vocal backers on here
Funny, I happen to find myself with a foot in both campsNo one is saying "Cole can do no wrong".
I think the two camps here are "Cole's not getting it done (and this implies he probably never will)" and "Cole's fine/will be fine (and you're overreacting)."
Perfetti is playing below the median TOI for a 2nd line forward at 5v5 (bottom 20 out of 96 in TOI/GP).So reading through the pages of Perfetti's play this year:
-apparently he's playing 4th line minutes
-his stats on pp1 this season do not count, but last year's do
-a call for more offense this year apparently means ppl want to trade him (don't think anyone has said this), writing him off completely for years to come.
Let me guess, this is all Rick Bowness' fault too?
I think it's warranted that the supposed highest upside offensive player, outside of ehlers, in the middle 6 should be producing much more.
How much flack from the Perfetti groupies would a poster receive if they predicted Perfetti would be in the same realm of offensive production as Namestnikov or the defense-first Lowry line? Or get all these ridiculous reaches of player comparables thrown at them?
Ofc there's half a season left so he can definitely turn it up, but to date he's been underwhelming.
I know who, Protas plays alot with Strome and Ovi but not on the number 1 PPWilson has 18, as well. Guess who those 2 are playing with?
Lol How are people implying he will never get it done? He's underwhelmed the last two seasons doesn't mean it'll happen forever. Just like Connor-scheifele this year vs years previous, no, doesn't guarantee it at all.No one is saying "Cole can do no wrong".
I think the two camps here are "Cole's not getting it done (and this implies he probably never will)" and "Cole's fine/will be fine (and you're overreacting)."
So is that fourth line minutes? Is he playing with Kupari and Barron? Yes or no.Perfetti is playing below the median TOI for a 2nd line forward at 5v5 (bottom 20 out of 96 in TOI/GP).
And I think it's reasonable to argue that this year's top powerplay unit is being used in a way that Perfetti doesn't make a good plug-and-play fit for Ehlers' role. But one poster's reasonable argument is another's excuse-making nonsense I guess...
I mean, I'm hoping he's fine and some people are overreacting, but his shot metrics are garbage and his PDO is sky high (27th with 1.046). His production is borderline acceptable, but that line isn't working and they're lucky to be way ahead on GF.Funny, I happen to find myself with a foot in both camps
I DO think that he can be contributing more, and i also think that his production isn't out of line with what's to be expected and I also think that it will improve as he gains more experience
It's so predictable too from some of these posters.don't really understand the argument that by saying perfetti needs to produce more means he will never get it done, If I didn't think he was capable of getting it done I wouldn't be posting that he needs to produce more, like take names for example, I don't think he is capable of more offense which is why I've been wanting an upgrade at 2c for a while now... such a stupid argument lol
They play with PLD. Washington fans love that line.I know who, Protas plays alot with Strome and Ovi but not on the number 1 PP
Agreed, a young actual #2 center under team control is what this team needs. I'm hoping Chevy is aggressive his pursuit.Get a bonafide #2 center and we probably aren’t having this discussion.
Names is a great team guy but he isn’t the answer for our 2nd line center
Stankoven has also been bottom six, including significant 4th line time, all season. That list of players was a swing and a miss for the point he was trying to make.I mean Byfield did spend time on the fourth line and it helped him. McTavish is not a 2C imo. Mercer is 3rd line checking this year...
Our 'second line' is really only getting about 3 more mins than our fourth line/PK guys
I just still dont really see where he fits on the second line - he's not winning draws when he's 2C and he doesn't have chemistry with Ehlers
You've been pretty down on him. Said he's not great at playmaking, his on-ice stats are all due to his teammates and Hellebuyck, he's not pulling his weight, and you don't see his upside.Lol How are people implying he will never get it done? He's underwhelmed the last two seasons doesn't mean it'll happen forever. Just like Connor-scheifele this year vs years previous, no, doesn't guarantee it at all.
So is that fourth line minutes? Is he playing with Kupari and Barron? Yes or no.
Where does he rank in pts/60 at 5v5? Is that ranking where you expected him?
The OP was he doesn't get pp1 minutes. He got it this year and didn't produce and the retort was well he produced last year... Who gives a shit. The original questions was on this year.
I think most posters are in both camps, just how this place works that you get pushed to one side or the other by those you take a hard stance one way or another. I’m probably pretty close to your viewpoint.Funny, I happen to find myself with a foot in both camps
I DO think that he can be contributing more, and i also think that his production isn't out of line with what's to be expected and I also think that it will improve as he gains more experience
Perfetti should always be compared to lundell and jarvis...and thats itStankoven has also been bottom six, including significant 4th line time, all season. That list of players was a swing and a miss for the point he was trying to make.
All that has to do with this season. Not the future. So once again you have terribly misguided implications and assumptions. You can check my earlier post, literally said my focus was not on the future bc of course he can turn it around and even said that in post 2222.You've been pretty down on him. Said he's not great at playmaking, his on-ice stats are all due to his teammates and Hellebuyck, he's not pulling his weight, and you don't see his upside.
If anyone brings up favorable comparisons or numbers or explanations you start complaining that they're blind apologists, cherry picking and just blaming everyone but Perfetti - which is ironic since you seem to be hostile to any and all reasonable discourse, and credit the good results of his line to everyone but him.
I don't think the information regarding Perfetti's TOI requires further clarification. But to further clarify, he gets 21st percentile 5v5 TOI for a 2nd liner and 28th percentile for 2nd line points/60.
The OP said he's on the second powerplay unit - which is true. 25 minutes of PP1 TOI over 9 games isn't a lot of sample size to base any conclusions on...so who gives a shit, indeed?
People can read but it’s not up to you to set parameters of the discussion. I think a lot of people’s opinions is, he is doing enough things right even if the offence has dried up. If the team can weather it and avoid spending for a replacement til he gets it going again, they are better for it, now and in the future.It's so predictable too from some of these posters.
Literally in one of my posts In an attempt on focusing on his play this year I said: "this is not a discussion of what he'll be in the future" as a disclaimer to try and avoid implications or assumptions of "never getting it done."
Unfortunately, overly sensitive posters on here can't help themselves. Maybe they don't read or are just stupid.
It's to avoid people making ridiculous assumptions like gmoney does.People can read but it’s not up to you to set parameters of the discussion. I think a lot of people’s opinions is, he is doing enough things right even if the offence has dried up. If the team can weather it and avoid spending for a replacement til he gets it going again, they are better for it, now and in the future.
So if anyone says he has been bad, everyone else just should say you are right or take it as gospel, and if anyone brings up anything good that he has done they are just a blind apologist and their opinions or stats don’t matter. So basically only your opinions and stats matter? I have said this before many of the things you say are correct, but many of the things posters say about the good things he has done are also correct.It's to avoid people making ridiculous assumptions like gmoney does.
In a post critiquing his play or stats for solely this year I am apparently now part of this camp that implies he well never get it done offensively, which is bullshit.
and that's with even specifying my thoughts are of his play this season so far, not rest of his career.
I used those guys and others in other posts because they are similar age. . Look at time on ice those guys all play a similar amount or more per gameStankoven has also been bottom six, including significant 4th line time, all season. That list of players was a swing and a miss for the point he was trying to make.
Maybe Marco Rossi too, if there is a standard against a rival, one draft pick ahead of him, and a similar stature player. Until this season I think Perfetti was seen as the better developed pick, outproducing Rossi in a similar amount of games.. Rossi is now playing top line center, coming off an 8 point week, Player of the Week, and is close to PPG now. As the Jets and Wild battle for top in the division. I read somewhere on these boards that the Wild have a top notch skating coach they employ, can't remember who it referenced though.Perfetti should always be compared to lundell and jarvis...and thats it
Quinn and Holtz were picked before him and aren't doing as well as Cole.Maybe Marco Rossi too, if there is a standard against a rival, one draft pick ahead of him, and a similar stature player. Until this season I think Perfetti was seen as the better developed pick, outproducing Rossi in a similar amount of games.. Rossi is now playing top line center, coming off an 8 point week, Player of the Week, and is close to PPG now. As the Jets and Wild battle for top in the division. I read somewhere on these boards that the Wild have a top notch skating coach they employ, can't remember who it referenced though.
Since I jinxed Stanley maybe I'll try to reverse jinx Perfetti by saying he should be benched for Chibrikov
Indeed.Quinn and Holtz were picked before him and aren't doing as well as Cole.