Caufield's production went from The Twilight Zone to The Farkit Zone; let's hope next season is all about The Offensive Zone. A stronger defence shouldn't diminish his scoring. The kid generates chances and is a natural sniper.
Yeah Chucky was every bit as good as his 30 goal season. It's something mental that put him off. People forget he was a 40-50 point guy for 5 years while being used terribly and not getting consistent minutes or linemates. He did very well in Arizona the first year and was on pace to be tied with Keller as their leading scorer. I think being traded in back to back summers shattered his confidence.The Galchenyuk example is bad as he performed really well at the start of the following season when it counted, he had 23 pts in 24 games +10 before his injury.
no, and it shouldn't be expected of him either
Caufield is not a PPG player
its easy to rack up points when wins and losses don't matter
He doesn't have to be a specialist but he does have to be responsible, which he's already shown glimpses of last season. He'll get thereDo we want Caufield to be a defensive specialist? I just want him to score as many goals as we can and play him with a defensively responsible center and winger.
He’s already shown he can back check well and doesn’t dog out plays so I think he’ll be fine. Last year everyone had terrible numbers so I wouldn’t hold that against him. I’m sure he’ll be fine but his priority should be scoring goals and not back checking.He doesn't have to be a specialist but he does have to be responsible, which he's already shown glimpses of last season. He'll get there
Plus with MLS, so his last 37 games, i think he was -9. Not that bad considering the situation of the team.He’s already shown he can back check well and doesn’t dog out plays so I think he’ll be fine. Last year everyone had terrible numbers so I wouldn’t hold that against him. I’m sure he’ll be fine but his priority should be scoring goals and not back checking.
I still find it astounding that Caufield managed to produce 35 points in 37 games under Marty St-Louis when he came aboard as head coach for the Habs last season, replacing a floundering Ducharme behind the bench.
That's an extremely small .95 PPG sample for Caufield, but it's half a season, nonetheless.
I'm always weary of a season gone to hell, where players are commonly referred to as playing in the Farkit Zone, with no care for defensive assignments and looking to pad their stats. I'm weary of that kind of production, like Caufield had under St-Louis, as a genuine benchmark for a consistent production from a still young player.
Remember Galchenyuk and his 30 goals in the Farkit Zone, the year the team was spiralling towards the basement of the regular season standings and both Chucky and Patio-ready through all defensive caution to the wind to both reach the 30-goal plateau in consistently losing efforts?
If you're scoring goals by the shovel-full, like Pacioretty and Galchenyuk had done, but the opposing line is still outscoring you and your team keeps tallying up losses, if you score 26 goals as a D (19 of those on the PP), but boast an abysmal -28 at even strength, like Souray did one year, are those performances strictly outlier production levels (to be crippled when the team is now playing to win) and are they even impactful to the team's success by the style of play that lead to those totals?
Will Caufield keep producing in the same manner when the games are on the line and wins are expected?
Caufield, product of the Farkit Zone, or the real deal?
In a 2019 re-draft, Wheeler has Cole going 5th overall to the Kings.
He has Hughes going 1st, Zegras going 2nd, and Seider going 3rd.
He has Dach at 11th (he went 3rd).
Kakko is 10th.
And he has the Habs taking Connor McMichael 15th.
Would like to know why Kakko before Dach lol.
In a 2019 re-draft, Wheeler has Cole going 5th overall to the Kings.
He has Hughes going 1st, Zegras going 2nd, and Seider going 3rd.
He has Dach at 11th (he went 3rd).
Kakko is 10th.
And he has the Habs taking Connor McMichael 15th.
we know if he gains some mass that not gonna change much physically wise he doesnt have the marty stlouis genetics in the lower body. ( legs)
It's a long season and his 22 goals in 37 games with MSL as the coach is not sustainable. However, you never know and the guy has a huge history of scoring goals everywhere he plays.
I'm going to say 35 goals if he plays close to a full season.
Why is it unsustainable?
For all we know, he's just getting started.
It's not like his goals were a lucky streak. There's no hurdle in replicating that. I think his points will ramp up once we have better puck movement from the backend.
Possible but not probable. A part of me sees the chemistry both Suzuki and Caufield have but it's a long season bro. I'm saying 70-80 pts is reachable but not going to expect it.
And the point you made about the back end is valid. That's why I'm pondering how much more Suzuki and Caufield can do. What I do know is if we don't have many injuries and we roll lines, I can see some momentum and with a better PP.
Why not? That comes out to around 45 goals in an 82 game season and I definitely see him as a future 40+ goal scorer. Might not happen this coming season but I see no reason to suspect Caufield isn't capable of a 40 goal pace.It's a long season and his 22 goals in 37 games with MSL as the coach is not sustainable. However, you never know and the guy has a huge history of scoring goals everywhere he plays.
I'm going to say 35 goals if he plays close to a full season.
I'm pretty optimistic, barring injuries, they will both get around 70 points.