Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 78,712
- 50,118
Opposite of criticism. I have a really high opinion of him. I think he should be getting at least 40 goals a year. He's played really well and gotten snakebit on some chances. Apart from getting more shots, I think he's actually played really well. His passing game is terrific.Only in Montreal can a young player with 14 points in 15 games be criticized. It was the same thing with Suzuki. They are great players. Will they be the best forward on a Stanley Cup winning team? Probably not, but that's okay. We just gotta find someone that can actually play with them. You saw how they played when they had Dach with them and I'm confident they would have bounced back from their slump as all great players do.
But there are certain players that you expect a certain level of performance from. If Crosby gets less than 100 points it was considered a sub par year, ditto if OV hit less than 50 goals. I see CC as an elite goalscorer. I expect him to compete for some Richards in the future. I think 40 goals should be his minimum this year. If he doesn't hit it I'll be disappointed. It's not criticism, it's high expectations and belief in a player. I think he'd good enough that he should be hitting 40 every year if he's healthy. He has more talent than any forward we've had probably since Richer (different skill sets) and I expect him to produce. I also expect his shooting percentage to improve. He'll be fine.