Book Feature Cold War on Ice: The NHL versus the Soviet Union in Hockey's Super Series '76 (by John G. Robertson and Carl T. Madden)

PrimumHockeyist

Registered User
Apr 7, 2018
648
405
hockey-stars.ca
That's a very good and very difficult question to answer. Considering that the Central Red Army club was absolutely loaded with players from the Soviet national team, I think any fair-minded fan of the NHL had to conclude they were on the same level--if not better--than the best NHL teams in 1975-76. The game in Montreal was, in many ways, a huge one for the NHL. If Central Red Army had beaten the Canadiens--who were the best team in the league on December 31, 1975--it would have embarrassed the NHL. I think many fans sensed this, so the pressure was truly on the Habs to win. The Habs dominated play territorially, but Vladislav Tretiak was outstanding in goal for Red Army, while Ken Dryden had a poor night for the Habs. Sam Pollock suggested the score could have been 7-0 for Montreal after the first period--which was a bit of hyperbole. Years later, Dick Irvin made the point that almost no one left the Forum when the third period ended. Most everyone lingered for the announcement of game's the three stars, because they all wanted to cheer Tretiak's performance as he had been the hero. Overall, I think NHL fans would have said that if Central Red Army played Montreal in a seven-game series, the Habs would have likely won it. How Red Army would have fared against the Flyers in a long series is anyone's guess. They were certainly intimidated by Philadelphia on January 11. Could they have coped in a seven-game series? We can only speculate. Even Boston played well against Red Army in the first period of their game. Maybe the Bruins would have won a long series, too. Overall, Central Red Army would have been a Stanley Cup contender, of course.
Thanks, John. I do think a lot of people would have loved to see a Habs0CRA series. I agree that CRA did indeed have the edge over the best NHL clubs, as we should expect for reasons you mention.

As for Philly 76, I don't think a series would have be viable. The Flyers were just too 70s North American nasty for CRA to hang with without revamping their line up and beef up. It wouldn't have been the same team! I think that the Soviets wold have been fine with that, as I think they were quite ideologically opposed to the Flyers kind of game.
 

Zine

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
12,379
2,507
That's a very good and very difficult question to answer. Considering that the Central Red Army club was absolutely loaded with players from the Soviet national team, I think any fair-minded fan of the NHL had to conclude they were on the same level--if not better--than the best NHL teams in 1975-76. The game in Montreal was, in many ways, a huge one for the NHL. If Central Red Army had beaten the Canadiens--who were the best team in the league on December 31, 1975--it would have embarrassed the NHL. I think many fans sensed this, so the pressure was truly on the Habs to win. The Habs dominated play territorially, but Vladislav Tretiak was outstanding in goal for Red Army, while Ken Dryden had a poor night for the Habs. Sam Pollock suggested the score could have been 7-0 for Montreal after the first period--which was a bit of hyperbole. Years later, Dick Irvin made the point that almost no one left the Forum when the third period ended. Most everyone lingered for the announcement of game's the three stars, because they all wanted to cheer Tretiak's performance as he had been the hero. Overall, I think NHL fans would have said that if Central Red Army played Montreal in a seven-game series, the Habs would have likely won it. How Red Army would have fared against the Flyers in a long series is anyone's guess. They were certainly intimidated by Philadelphia on January 11. Could they have coped in a seven-game series? We can only speculate. Even Boston played well against Red Army in the first period of their game. Maybe the Bruins would have won a long series, too. Overall, Central Red Army would have been a Stanley Cup contender, of course.

Thanks, John. I do think a lot of people would have loved to see a Habs0CRA series. I agree that CRA did indeed have the edge over the best NHL clubs, as we should expect for reasons you mention.

As for Philly 76, I don't think a series would have be viable. The Flyers were just too 70s North American nasty for CRA to hang with without revamping their line up and beef up. It wouldn't have been the same team! I think that the Soviets wold have been fine with that, as I think they were quite ideologically opposed to the Flyers kind of game.

I'd say both leagues were on par with each other circa 1976. Canada always had more innate depth than the USSR, but the NHL had almost twice as many teams as the Soviet League in addition to the WHA pulling players away.
FYI, CSKA didn't even win the league title that year. Spartak did.

Re: Philadelphia,
I can't image any Soviet club defeating the Flyers; even with a physically beefed up lineup (at least on NHL ice). The style of game parodied in "Slap Shot" was just too foreign a concept for any Soviet team to contend with without giving up an immense amount of skill. And frankly, AFAIK, most NHL fans probably wouldn't have wanted an extended Flyers-Soviet series as it would have legitimized the Flyers style of game. I'm under the impression the North American hockey world was quickly losing patience with the Flyers at the time.
 
Last edited:

PrimumHockeyist

Registered User
Apr 7, 2018
648
405
hockey-stars.ca
Re: Philadelphia,
I can't image any Soviet club defeating the Flyers; even with a physically beefed up lineup (at least on NHL ice). The style of game parodied in "Slap Shot" was just too foreign a concept for any Soviet team to contend with without giving up an immense amount of skill. And frankly, AFAIK, most NHL fans probably wouldn't have wanted an extended Flyers-Soviet series as it would have legitimized the Flyers style of game. I'm under the impression the North American hockey world was quickly losing patience with the Flyers at the time.

You are certainly correct about the patience things, although this style of play went over well in enough corners to keep going.

I am convinced that this is one thing that was in play in Vancouver, during Game 4 of the Summit Series. Aside from the anti-Canadians in the crowd, most fans were frustrated in general. But there was also this anger about how the game had devolved since the NHL's doubling, and of the NHL brass wanting it that way. In my opinion, a lot of the applause that was directed at the Soviets in Game Four that game was a result of the frustration you mention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zine

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,664
5,067
@John Robertson & @CTMadden: Speaking of the game in Philadelphia, basically at the sime time when your book was released, another book with a very similiar topic was published: "The Game That Saved the NHL: The Broad Street Bullies, the Soviet Red Machine, and Super Series '76" by Ed Gruver. Do you (or anyone else) had the opportunity to read it? It would be interesting in which regards it differs from your book and in which it overlaps.
 

CTMadden

Registered User
Jun 10, 2023
9
5
@John Robertson & @CTMadden: Speaking of the game in Philadelphia, basically at the sime time when your book was released, another book with a very similiar topic was published: "The Game That Saved the NHL: The Broad Street Bullies, the Soviet Red Machine, and Super Series '76" by Ed Gruver. Do you (or anyone else) had the opportunity to read it? It would be interesting in which regards it differs from your book and in which it overlaps.
I have not had the opportunity to read it, I am uncertain about John though. I would imagine his version would be somewhat more in depth version but definitely would make for an interesting read. Had I been aware of it at the time, we may have been more inclined to read it.
 

DANOZ28

Registered User
May 22, 2012
7,141
483
nearest bar MN
was this the series of games the russians crushed everybody (including my northstars) except the broad street bullies, philly just beat the living h3ll out of them?
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,991
10,960
Nova Scotia
About Cold War on Ice

Just three years after the ground-breaking and impactful 1972 Canada-Soviet Series, the NHL and the USSR’s ice hockey federation agreed to have the top two Soviet teams from 1974-75 play four games each versus eight different NHL clubs in their home buildings in late December 1975 through early January 1976. Such was the importance of the series in the USSR that the entire Soviet hockey league went on hiatus for three weeks while the perennial Soviet champions, Central Red Army, and their closest pursuers, Wings of the Soviet, were in North America. (Both clubs had augmented their rosters by borrowing top players from other Soviet teams for the occasion.) They would face the Rangers, the Penguins, the Canadiens, the Sabres, the Blackhawks, the Bruins, the Islanders, and the Flyers. At last, the NHL could say their players were in mid-season form with familiar teammates when they met the vaunted Soviet hockey machine. Although meeting of hockey’s powerhouses had no official name, the media dubbed the games “Super Series ‘76”—a catchy moniker that caught on. The anticipation was tremendous. Only the game in Pittsburgh failed to sell out.
As a prelude, the book tells the history of the Canada-Soviet international hockey rivalry from its shocking start in 1954 to the emotional 1972 Summit Series. This nicely leads to in-depth stories of all eight Super Series ’76 contests, with the highlights being the titanic New Year’s Eve battle in Montreal and the infamous “walkout” game in Philadelphia on January 11.

This book may be purchased at Cold War on Ice - McFarland

Excerpt from Cold War on Ice

On Thursday, January 1, the Buffalo Sabres hosted the Los Angeles Kings at Memorial Auditorium. The Sabres looked dreadful, losing 9-6, in a game where both teams’ defenses went completely out the window. Observing the contest from the stands was a group of VIP guests: the Soviet Wings. They would play the Sabres three days later in a memorable Sunday afternoon clash. Based on what they saw the Sabres do (or not do) against the Kings, the touring team did not think much of their upcoming opponents.
“When our guys watched the Sabres play that night,” admitted Wings coach Boris Kulagin on January 4, “our players thought it was an easy team to beat. They were mistaken.”1
It turned out they were more than just mistaken—they were badly mistaken. The Sabres rolled past the Soviet Wings, 12-6, in a wild game that would have been one of the highest-scoring in NHL history had it been a league game and counted in its statistics. Finally, after four games of Super Series ’76, an NHL team recorded a victory over a Soviet opponent. Furthermore, it was a spectacular one.
There was an international incident before the game started. It was a snub toward Canada. At Buffalo home games, Canadian hockey fans typically comprise a huge chunk of the attendance. The Sabres recognize and value this obvious fact by playing the Canadian national anthem as well as “The Star-Spangled Banner” before their home games regardless of which NHL teams are playing. It has been the case since the team began play in the NHL in the 1970-71 season. However, in accordance with the IIHF’s international hockey protocols, only the anthems of the participating teams could be played. During the opening ceremonies, the fans were apprised by the public-address announcer that “O Canada” would not be played that afternoon. They were a displeased bunch and loudly booed the omission. Typical of the demographics of the NHL in 1976, Buffalo had just one American on its roster, defenseman Lee Fogolin, who was born in Chicago. All the other Sabres were Canadians.
There were obviously many knowledgeable Canadian hockey fans in attendance at the Aud, as usual. When the Wings of the Soviet were introduced individually, the familiar names from the 1972 Canada-Soviet series—particularly Alexander Yakushev—received extended applause.
Emotions were running noticeably high in the Sabres’ antiquated and undersized arena. Even without the anthem controversy, the air was thick with anticipation and passion. “The tension is really building here at the Aud as the teams get ready for the first period,”2 noted play-by-play man Bill Hewitt. A significant snowstorm in the Buffalo area—hardly a rarity in western New York in January—did not keep anyone away from the sold-out arena. Hockey fans were keenly interested in seeing how the high-flying Buffalo Sabres would fare against the Soviet visitors. Beyond the Memorial Auditorium would be an estimated worldwide TV audience of 200 million people. The bulk of the viewership would be in the Soviet Union and Canada, but the game was also being televised in West Germany and Japan.
Buffalo was playing without their captain, Jim Schoenfeld. He was ill. There was a fear that he had contracted mononucleosis, but tests for that disease came back negative. It was a less serious infection. Buffalo general-manager George (Punch) Imlach, who was making a onetime appearance as a color commentator for Hockey Night in Canada, said the Sabres would be without Schoenfeld’s services for about ten days.
Perhaps two of Buffalo’s best players had something extra to prove against the Soviets that Sunday afternoon. Both Gilbert Perreault and Rick Martin had been two of the disgruntled players who opted to leave Team Canada partway through the 1972 Summit Series because they were not getting enough ice time. When the Series was over, they caught hell for their decision from many unsympathetic Canadian hockey fans for not toughing it out.
Prior to the opening faceoff, the organist at Buffalo Memorial Auditorium entertained the capacity crowd with some Russian-themed music: “Somewhere, My Love” from Doctor Zhivago. There was not much love to be had, however, once the puck was dropped by NHL referee Ron Wicks.
Thirty-six seconds into the game there were offsetting penalties to each team for stick fouls, but more critical to Buffalo was the loss of Don Luce. He injured his leg after taking a solid and legal body check from Yuri Liapkin. Luce hobbled off the ice with the assistance of a trainer. He would miss the remainder of the first period, but Luce would be back on the ice for the faceoff to start the second stanza.

View attachment 934894


Authors’ information

John G. Robertson is a 60-year-old sports history author who lives in Cambridge, Ontario. He has been researching and writing selected histories of various sports since the age of 19. Published in 2023, Cold War on Ice: The NHL vs. the Soviet Union in Hockey’s Super Series ‘76 is his fourth of five books thus far about hockey history. The other four are Too Many Men on the Ice: The 1978-79 Boston Bruins and the Most Famous Penalty in Hockey History (2018); Hockey’s Wildest Season: The changing of the Guard in the NHL, 1969-1970 (2021); The Bruins in 25 Games (2023); and most recently Five Overtimes: The Habs and the Leafs in the 1951 Stanley Cup Finals (2024). All four were published by McFarland. Other books by Robertson include several scholarly works on both baseball and boxing history.

Carl T. Madden is a 49-year-old longtime sports fan who lives in Welland, Ontario. He used to edit and proofread manuscripts before taking up the writing and research aspects of bringing such stories to life as something to do during the pandemic. The enjoyment discovered in the process has made it a continuous and rewarding venture.
That was such a big thing at the home. I remember watching the Sabres, Flyers, Habs games.

Sabres game I remember them saying at start 8 million Russians watching. Howie Meeker saying at end of game, wonder if still 8 million Russians watching?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad