Confirmed Trade: [COL/SJS] Mackenzie Blackwood, Givani Smith, 2027 5th for Alexandar Georgiev (14% ret.), Nikolai Kovalenko, 2026 2nd, cond. 2025 4th

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,751
15,510
Folsom
I like the work Grier has done; I really do—rooting for him and SJ.

With that said, you still need veteran talent to support the youth, especially in net. This team has a bottom-5 D; you need a goaltender who can, at the very least, provide stability so the youth doesn’t become disillusioned. Losing too much can mitigate player development.
I don't think these kids you're talking about are that fragile. There's only three kids to worry about with this and two are in their rookie years. If they're mentally fragile enough to let a trade of similarly experienced and talented goalies make them disillusioned and mitigate player development, they only have themselves to blame and it would make building around them very questionable. They should already know they were going to a bad team. You don't get picked 1st, 4th, and 7th overall in most cases to go to anything but a bad team. They need to be tougher than that, show more patience than that, and show they're part of the answer moving forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedgreen

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,695
21,792
Vegass
I don't think these kids you're talking about are that fragile. There's only three kids to worry about with this and two are in their rookie years. If they're mentally fragile enough to let a trade of similarly experienced and talented goalies make them disillusioned and mitigate player development, they only have themselves to blame and it would make building around them very questionable. They should already know they were going to a bad team. You don't get picked 1st, 4th, and 7th overall in most cases to go to anything but a bad team. They need to be tougher than that, show more patience than that, and show they're part of the answer moving forward.
While true, Eklund was drafted 4 years ago and to me he's starting to show the frustrations of someone tired of being on a losing squad. I can't put my finger on it but he strikes me as a player who may possibly want out if things don't turn around by the end of next year. He gets frustrated, starts showing bad habits, gets reprimanded, rekindles his fire, rinse repeat...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trow

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,751
15,510
Folsom
While true, Eklund was drafted 4 years ago and to me he's starting to show the frustrations of someone tired of being on a losing squad. I can't put my finger on it but he strikes me as a player who may possibly want out if things don't turn around by the end of next year. He gets frustrated, starts showing bad habits, gets reprimanded, rekindles his fire, rinse repeat...
I don't know how you see what you're seeing but it's possible. And if it turns out that he wants out, I would max value on him and oblige. They will need committed young players to rebuild this thing and if he's not up for that for whatever reason then get something the team can use for him. Someone who already wants out without even playing two full NHL seasons is a red flag to me when it comes to the mental side of playing in the NHL. I don't think that's what the situation is with Eklund but that's how I'd view such a situation if it were an accurate representation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedgreen

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
25,293
43,915
colorado
Visit site
Whenever I see video of the young Sharks it looks like they’re having a blast being in the NHL. I doubt they need to shelter them from the realities of life very much at this point. They’re too busy proving they belong in the league to shed too many tears about a mediocre goalie being moved out for a lesser goalie. It’s not like Georgiev has never been a good goalie before. They didn’t think they were making the playoffs.

They also got some legit help amongst the forwards in Kovalenko who may fit in great with their build. He’s no star but he could play a role for a few years.
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,695
21,792
Vegass
I don't know how you see what you're seeing but it's possible. And if it turns out that he wants out, I would max value on him and oblige. They will need committed young players to rebuild this thing and if he's not up for that for whatever reason then get something the team can use for him. Someone who already wants out without even playing two full NHL seasons is a red flag to me when it comes to the mental side of playing in the NHL. I don't think that's what the situation is with Eklund but that's how I'd view such a situation if it were an accurate representation.
It’s just a gut feeling. I could (and probably am) way off base, but all his post game interviews he just seems so annoyed. I imagine considering he’s been there for a while now that he’s eager for more success so I don’t blame him for being frustrated with the losses. That competitive fire is a great thing to have but after a while I imagine the struggles gets to you.
 

jMoneyBrah

Registered User
Jan 10, 2013
1,273
1,980
South Bay
While true, Eklund was drafted 4 years ago and to me he's starting to show the frustrations of someone tired of being on a losing squad. I can't put my finger on it but he strikes me as a player who may possibly want out if things don't turn around by the end of next year. He gets frustrated, starts showing bad habits, gets reprimanded, rekindles his fire, rinse repeat...

Eklund’s been a full time NHLer for like 1.5 seasons. If he’s throwing in the towel on the Sharks situation already, and with the recent and soon to arrive talent, well he’s a hell of a lot less intelligent than I thought.

To be clear, other than the general desire to not loose I’ve seen nothing from Eklund that leads me to believe he’s been nothing but a solid teammate and enthusiastic member of the Sharks org. Frankly, it seems like he loves playing with Granlund, Zetterlund, Celebrini, and Smith. Maybe not being able to put a finger on it just means you’re inventing something to worry about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jargon

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
53,369
17,662
South Rectangle
I know the concept of a trade that both teams win is a logical paradox that will make some HFers head blow up like they are a Star Trek android, but Blackwood is an improvement over Geo, doesn't have a millstone for a contract and they made the deal without giving up any of their good prospects.

And in the immortal words of Joe Namath "It's last call. Miss America ain't walking through the door" Gibson was the only potentially better option. Geo only reached blackwood's .909 svp in 5 out of 18 games this year.
 

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
5,529
5,571
wedgewood is playing pretty well right now. you might see a platoon situation in colorado. it will be interesting to see what blackwood can do in front of a team like the avs.
 

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
15,425
14,865
I think he had like 40 wins last year?

Credit shall go where credit is due. Does not matter he is garbage now, or was shite at times back in his Rangers days. He did good last year, period.

This only proves the saying that goalies are voodoo, they can randomly become great for prolonged period, but then somehow lose their mojo, that may or may not come back. Therefore giving them contracts like Bobrovsky got, or Shesterkin is supposed to get, is a massive risk.

And on top, if I recall correctly Georgiev won the goalie challenge at the All star game and took home $100K USD.
 

TruePowerSlave

Registered User
Jun 27, 2015
7,621
9,267
While you never know if Blackwood will succeed in Colorado, I dont see how anyone can say the Avs did not do well with the goalie trades. In just a few weeks they went from horrendous goaltending to NHL caliber netminding without giving up much.

Ideally the goaltending would have been sorted out in the offseason, but better late than never.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad