Blake kicked the tires on some goalies, but refused to pay top assets. That would include Shesterkin. Blake’s signed enough long-term, high dollar contracts and have zero need to take on the Ranger’s deep 30 contracts even if they could afford it under the cap. But, most importantly, Byfield is going nowhere. You need to come to bit of reality and accept that.
There was a published report LAK is hard for him
would prefer obv only to pay him as ufa and surrender no assets, but that is not gonna happen
either Rs get good enuf return and move him, or keep him and deal him later.
I agree a REASONABLE add w/Shesty goes for Byfield, but that is likely the currency to be returned esp if you want to outbid competition
TOR also needs a major move to avoid a repeat, and this is up their alley
Your extension with him will include a no movement and no trade clause
Thinking you can get Shesterkin to sign any contract that doesn't include a full NMC and then trade him later is pure delusion.
The rangers are going to pay shesterkin his demands and keep him.
Nobody is paying out the wazoo for the right to pay a goalie that much.
bern has been saying and fact they regret it w/zib proves I am correct
no NMCs to anyone, period, for any reason
Signif ntcs can protect player sufficiently w/o castrating mgmt