Byslma's served as assistant for the Cincinatti Mighty Ducks for a year 04-05 (during the lockout). Wonder if Murray had any hand in hiring him?
Based on what?I'm scared of his impact on very very young potential star players...
Based on what?
Penguins had no stars outside of Crosby and Malkin. Unless you want to count Kris Letang, who developed just fine.
Based on the complexity of his known scheme.
Seeking compensation for a fired coach is such BS.
Ok, I get that.
I'm not that worried about it. The potential stars we do have are very smart players and I think can handle it fine.
So, can we create a drinking game of whatever coaches we hire press conference:
1) Press asks about Mike Babcock, take a shot
2) Press asks new coach about if how ted nolan was treated affected their decision, take a shot.
3) Battista sighting: 2 shots
4) Battista question: 3 shots
5) Battista questions ACTUALLY ACKNOWLEDGED and RESPONDED to: chug
6) Ted Black visibly sighs and/or facepalms: take a shot
7) Questions about why or why not any member of the pegula family is or isn't there: take a shot
8) Evander Kane question to new coach: take a shot
9) Tim Murray death stare following a question: two shots
10) Question about season ending press conference: kick a dead horse, take a shot
11) Mike Gilbert has to interrupt press questions to keep people on topic of new coach hire: take a shot
12) Terry, Ted, or Tim references "talking to your boss" when speaking to any TBN reporter: Take a shot
13) Any TBN reporter asks thinly veiled, two/three part questions which will obviously be used as ammo for a hilariously bad attack column the next week: 2 shots.
Pretty sure this will get everyone drunk.
Seeking compensation for a fired coach is such BS.
If you "fire" or "relieve" a coach of his duties, you should lose your rights to compensation draft picks. It's pretty simple.
exactly, its like breaking up with your girlfriend and asking for a pair of her panties when she gets a new boyfriend
That is an interest perspective
If you "fire" or "relieve" a coach of his duties, you should lose your rights to compensation draft picks. It's pretty simple.
Meh, as long as teams are paying out the balance of their contract, they should have some control.
If a coach wants to be free to go anywhere, they should mutually terminate their contract.
For example. Team A fires a coach with 2 years left on his contract. They wouldn't want the coach going to team B and spilling which players the GM wants to GTFO.
The best example I could think of was Chiarelli being hired from Boston and essentially having the contract that Chara's agent requested from Ottawa written up and ready to sign when Chara hit UFA without ever speaking to Chara's agent as GM of the Bruins.
Shero is a horrible GM and gave Bylsma next to nothing to work with outside of their top 4 players. Nothing at all for depth.
I'm curious to see what Bylsma can do with star players AND actual depth.
The reality is that Bylsma was able to push the team over the hump right away. The years following they had some playoff success but were never able to even get back to the hump, always falling just short. Whether that's more damning on Bylsma or on the GM is a debate that won't end any time soon.