Pierre from Orleans
Registered User
- May 9, 2007
- 27,555
- 20,233
Huh? Where did this come from? What beefI wonder what the beef between him and Brady was.
Huh? Where did this come from? What beefI wonder what the beef between him and Brady was.
Well, might have something to do with the coaching change, Brady was nearly a pt per game under Martin, with 53 pts in 55 games. The whole team played better under Martin after a breakin period of about a dozen games.why did Brady play better when all the pressure was off and we were eliminated? he was a ghost when things actually mattered.
also Giroux definitely mailed it in the second half, probably the first time in his career that he has. you could tell his heart wasn't into it.
Well, might have something to do with the coaching change, Brady was nearly a pt per game under Martin, with 53 pts in 55 games. The whole team played better under Martin after a breakin period of about a dozen games.
Was that because of lack of pressure, or the result of good coaching? idk, maybe a bit of both. We were also missing Zub (7 out of 26 games), Chabot (17 out of 26 games), Pinto (26 out of 26 games) and Greig (10 out of 26 games) for a good chunk of DJ's 26 games as coach, we were then pretty healthy until about game 60 losing Norris for the remainder of the season, and then some key guys got shut down towards the end of the year.
Apparently out of a small dark hole.Huh? Where did this come from? What beef
Correlation is not causation, there are a number of variables at play, I showed how health/suspension could easily have played into our poor start this year, we had a number of key players missing time early, and our improved played correlated with both us getting healthy and a coaching change, perhaps though, as a young team, we struggle with the pressure, hard to say.sure bit of both, but this team playing well only when all the pressure is off has been a pattern for what 4-5 years now?
Only player with a beef seemed to be Chychurn, and Branny got a little pissed as well sitting and playing forward couple of times.I wonder what the beef between him and Brady was.
lol, like you’ve been in the room.Can't blame Giroux. He walked into a locker room that's more focused in money, drinking and gambling than actually winning hockey games.
It's a sad state of affairs in Sens land.
Correlation is not causation, there are a number of variables at play, I showed how health/suspension could easily have played into our poor start this year, we had a number of key players missing time early, and our improved played correlated with both us getting healthy and a coaching change, perhaps though, as a young team, we struggle with the pressure, hard to say.
Isn't every professional athlete & sports teams into drinking & gambling & making as much money as possible? Gambling advertising is everywhere during sports games, these guys make millions of dollars, Jaromir Jagr was known to have lost $500K betting on an on line gambling site. It's a sad state of affairs in sports in general & not just in Ottawa, although this is more heresay & opinion than fact. Isn't it well known that AHL teams & even junior teams that take buses everywhere play poker in the back of the bus? Why attribute this well known behaviour throughout sports on just the Sens when it is rampid throughtout sports?Can't blame Giroux. He walked into a locker room that's more focused in money, drinking and gambling than actually winning hockey games.
It's a sad state of affairs in Sens land.
he definitely checked out, the kids and losing broke him.
And he should be embarrassed at his own effort. Leaders "don't mail it in".also Giroux definitely mailed it in the second half, probably the first time in his career that he has. you could tell his heart wasn't into it.
Can't blame Giroux???? Sure as hell we can.Can't blame Giroux. He walked into a locker room that's more focused in money, drinking and gambling than actually winning hockey games.
It's a sad state of affairs in Sens land.
I think it's far more likely that we saw the beginnings of Giroux aging out rather than him dogging it. Once you go beyond 35, the end usually isn't far behind.
I think it's far more likely that we saw the beginnings of Giroux aging out rather than him dogging it. Once you go beyond 35, the end usually isn't far behind.
I think Giroux should be bumped to the third line where he can help Greig develop as a C. In the top 6, we need a bit more speed and tenacity, and that’s what we should be looking at this off-season.He definitely is aging out. He's got a lot of miles on him, and isn't exactly the biggest body around.
He can still be useful...if his role is managed properly. Lower icetime and a bit more care in matchups.
The real question is, what is his next contract going to look like (if he even wants another contract), and can we afford to pay the premium he'd want? And is it the right choice to overpay him on a 1-2 year deal?
I don't know what Giroux wants; however, I suspect he might want a better chance at being on an SC champion team than he will have next year and beyond with the Senators. Since he is a UFA he will choose his next team wisely and it will have a better chance than 1/32nd. He will likely have to take a significant salary cut to get there since the better teams will be near the cap ceiling.I think Giroux should be bumped to the third line where he can help Greig develop as a C. In the top 6, we need a bit more speed and tenacity, and that’s what we should be looking at this off-season.
With that being said, I really don’t see an issue with his next contract. A lot has been made about how bad we are but I think Giroux is going to retire here no matter what. He has a baby on the way and he moved home to be closer to family. I don’t think at this stage he’s going to uproot his life to chase a 1/32 chance at a cup.
Similar to Spezza in Toronto, I think we could see some smaller deals on a year to year basis (not as low as spezza’s AAV was though). Obviously if he puts up 80 points next year this won’t be the case, but to your point earlier I do think we need to reduce his minutes and responsibilities so he can pace himself.
Yeah I mean who knows, we don’t know the guy. But how many players return home to end their career and end up leaving? While I think he genuinely wanted to win when he signed here, if it was his number one priority he’d have gone elsewhere. Doesn’t mean he can’t change his mind.I don't know what Giroux wants; however, I suspect he might want a better chance at being on an SC champion team than he will have next year and beyond with the Senators. Since he is a UFA he will choose his next team wisely and it will have a better chance than 1/32nd. He will likely have to take a significant salary cut to get there since the better teams will be near the cap ceiling.
I think (purely speculating) Giroux took this deal to be in his hometown. If he wanted to win that badly, he wouldn't have signed with us in the first place.I don't know what Giroux wants; however, I suspect he might want a better chance at being on an SC champion team than he will have next year and beyond with the Senators. Since he is a UFA he will choose his next team wisely and it will have a better chance than 1/32nd. He will likely have to take a significant salary cut to get there since the better teams will be near the cap ceiling.
I would happily send Giroux wherever he wants to go. He gave us two great years, we’ll be fine even if we don’t get a 2026 2nd round pick.If we're out of the playoff picture and Giroux says he wants out, I just hope he doesn't restrict us the way Tarasenko did.
He's got a NMC so he'll definitely be picking where he goes if that situation arises. Fingers crossed that we don't even get to that pointI would happily send Giroux wherever he wants to go. He gave us two great years, we’ll be fine even if we don’t get a 2026 2nd round pick.