Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 21,087
- 9,168
That is sensible. Finally.Then he is never moving. Reality is a 2nd rnd pick.
That is sensible. Finally.Then he is never moving. Reality is a 2nd rnd pick.
Tanev isn’t as good as Hamonic. He’s a fair bit better. Lol at the calgarypuck klownTanev is as good as Hamonic, and if the latter can fetch a first, and two seconds, Tanev should fetch a similar amount.
Tanev is as good as Hamonic, and if the latter can fetch a first, and two seconds, Tanev should fetch a similar amount.
I don't see how you're getting that much for a guy who has only played 68% of an 82 game season on average since 2013. That's not even counting how many games he missed (or would have missed) for a team with extended post season play. What's the point of paying a bunch for a top for guy if there's basically a 1 in 3 chance he will be out when you need him?
If they turned that deal down they are incredibly dumbWell, it may surprise you that according to the article below, the Leafs, this year, offered a 1st+Liljegren for Tanev (not sure if i believe that, but Botchford backs it up)....which i can't believe they turned down. But for those that say "Toronto wouldn't pay that much for Tanev"....apparently, they would.
Report: Leafs make significant trade offer to Canucks for another defenseman, involving top prospect
No thanks. As bad as Sutter's contract is, he's a perfect guy for our rebuild right now. Moving Sutter would make Bo our only viable centre. Sutter at least takes the defensive zone draws and allows Bo to play more offensively.To TOR:
Chris Tanev
Brandon Suter
To VAN:
1st
2nd
Carrick/Nielsen/Holl
Martin
Is that a good framework to start a deal?