Proposal: Chris Tanev for McCarron + 2017 1st

Gains

Registered User
Apr 29, 2012
1,803
881
Montreal
I won't get into the value, but it doesn't work because he's a RHD. If you could clone him but as a LHD I would strongly consider this. It would be an all-in move.
 

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,580
3,570
First off. Tanev is hurt again. And they haven't announced how long he's out. Second. That's a lot to give up for a top 4 guy that brings zero offence. The 1st is fine. But adding one of Montreals top prospects is to much. And finally. Montreal only has $2.5 m in cap space and Tanev has a $4.5m hit. So no, it doesn't work for Montreal.
 

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,580
3,570
Not to mention that any trade involving a defenceman will need to have a roster D going the other way. Otherwise Montreal will be forced to send someone down. Likely Pateryn, who requires waivers and likely wouldn't clear.
 

scan15*

Registered User
May 11, 2016
1,113
0
GTA
Easy pass for the Canucks.

McCarron is a 3rd liner at best and that 1st rounder has little value if Price stays healthy.
 

zcaptain

Registered User
Apr 4, 2012
1,559
530
First off. Tanev is hurt again. And they haven't announced how long he's out. Second. That's a lot to give up for a top 4 guy that brings zero offence. The 1st is fine. But adding one of Montreals top prospects is to much. And finally. Montreal only has $2.5 m in cap space and Tanev has a $4.5m hit. So no, it doesn't work for Montreal.

Aside from the broken foot which is not really an issue (wait 5 weeks to make the trade).....we can make some adjustments to make it work......

TANEV + JORDAN SUBBAN for McCarron + 2017 1st + cash dump + plus

The plus from Montreal depends on the size of the cash dump = Juulsen?

Maybe some retention

Point is you can make it work

The original idea was born out of an article where I read that Montreal wanted to give Webber SOME HELP ON THE Right Side SO he doesn't burnout or get hurt because of over use.
 

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,580
3,570
Aside from the broken foot which is not really an issue (wait 5 weeks to make the trade).....we can make some adjustments to make it work......

TANEV + JORDAN SUBBAN for McCarron + 2017 1st + cash dump + plus

The plus from Montreal depends on the size of the cash dump = Juulsen?

Maybe some retention

Point is you can make it work

The original idea was born out of an article where I read that Montreal wanted to give Webber SOME HELP ON THE Right Side SO he doesn't burnout or get hurt because of over use.

How does adding Subban = Montreal adding a cash dump +? Subban is a long shot prospect. There simply isn't a fit here
 

Riggins

Registered User
Jul 12, 2002
8,037
5,365
Vancouver, BC
The Habs need a lefty not a righty. McCarron is a rare breed so the Habs aren't going to deal him. They will ride it out and see how he turns out. Tanev is very good but it's not a fit. Don't bother bringing up Edler... he has a NTC and he's a shell of his former self.
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,388
2,377
First off. Tanev is hurt again. And they haven't announced how long he's out. Second. That's a lot to give up for a top 4 guy that brings zero offence. The 1st is fine. But adding one of Montreals top prospects is to much. And finally. Montreal only has $2.5 m in cap space and Tanev has a $4.5m hit. So no, it doesn't work for Montreal.

A late 1st and a prospect who looks like a middle sixer is too much for a top 4 dman signed long term? WOW, and people say Tanev is over rated.....
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,901
6,252
A late 1st and a prospect who looks like a middle sixer is too much for a top 4 dman signed long term? WOW, and people say Tanev is over rated.....

When the player is below top 6 production offensively there becomes a point where it doesn't matter how good he his in his own zone.
 

Peter Griffin

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
35,222
7,799
Visit site
When the player is below top 6 production offensively there becomes a point where it doesn't matter how good he his in his own zone.

Other than last season, Vlasic has had similar offensive production to Tanev and I would venture the Sharks have been pretty happy with his role on their team over the years. A rock solid defensive defenseman that puts up 20 points is worth more to his team than a 40 point defenseman that is a liability in his own zone.
 

PTH

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
416
0
Quebec City
Visit site
If Tanev were a lefty, this would be a great proposal and I think both teams would benefit.

Still, the point about the Habs moving a D in any deal makes sense: otherwise we have to move another one (probably), and are certainly in trouble for the expansion draft.

A lefty top-4 defenseman at 5 million or less, for McCarron and Beaulieu ?
 

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,901
6,252
Other than last season, Vlasic has had similar offensive production to Tanev and I would venture the Sharks have been pretty happy with his role on their team over the years. A rock solid defensive defenseman that puts up 20 points is worth more to his team than a 40 point defenseman that is a liability in his own zone.

I forgot when Chris Tanev was a candidate to play top 4 minutes for team Canada.
Chris Tanev is a nice middle pairing shut down guy, his return will reflect such.
 

Canadian Canuck

Hughes4Calder
Jul 30, 2013
14,228
3,973
Kamloops BC
This is atrocious. A prospect and a vert late 1st at the moment for A top pairing SHUTDOWN defensive defenseman. Can't stress this enough Tanev is one of the best shutdown defensman in the NHL. That's why he's a #2. Nothing more or less. He's a number two on almost every team in the NHL. Another thing is he's on an amazing long term contract and is still young enough to be in a rebuild. Not trading him unless there's a blue chip prospect coming back+.

Sergachev++ would be the asking price.
 

me2

Go ahead foot
Jun 28, 2002
37,913
5,605
Make my day.
When the player is below top 6 production offensively there becomes a point where it doesn't matter how good he his in his own zone.

Top 6 what? 15-20 ES points a year is fine for shutdown D. He lacks PP ability and doesn't play there, if you don't expect him to QB your PP is not a problem. If you do then you shouldn't be looking for a shutdown D.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad