It's incredibly an incredibly broad, complex spectrum that you're never going to convince people of until they have a significant understanding of the limitations of each specific individual.i feel like that's a broad spectrum...someone's mental capacity...it's not black and white...
So what do we do? Create a scale multiplication for how much responsibility one should carry based on how emotionally or intellectually capable they are?
So time served multiplied by your mental capability grade(a scale varying from like 0.1-10)
So if you're severely under capable and you commit a crime of 5 years jail...you would go 5x0.1 = 6 months of jail...but if you're highly capable, could be 5x10 = 50 years of jail.
That would be the most fair way, no?
Or maybe their ability to think shouldn't be a factor, but rather a black and white punishment to A) keep dangerous people off the street and B) have a strong deterrent for those who are capable of thinking about what they're doing.
I'm currently the primary caregiver for my father who, unknowingly, had early onset dementia prior to having his marriage and career end abruptly. He lost the ability to manage his personal finances and was prone to being misled online. Somewhat similar to what Chris Simon was dealing with as a result of his CTE diagnosis.
People with diminished cognitive ability are prone to making poor decisions because they don't have the ability to differentiate between right and wrong. Its primarily impulse and immediate gratification.
And there are an overwhelming number of complex phishing scams in the world today designed to identify these specific individuals, which allow scammers constant access to these individuals to defraud them by any means. If that individual has isolated themselves from friends and family, the damage that can be done in a short period of time is unimaginable.
Sorry to spin a bit off-topic, but I think it's important to focus on how Chris Simon's CTE diagnosis changes the way his actions are perceived, particularly later in his life.