Gallagbi
Formerly Eazy_B97
- Jul 5, 2005
- 48,821
- 12,673
We're about to be in the same spot with Marner.Yeah I think he’s meat and potatoes as a GM.
Losing UFAs is also dictated by circumstances though. Calgary factor.
We're about to be in the same spot with Marner.Yeah I think he’s meat and potatoes as a GM.
Losing UFAs is also dictated by circumstances though. Calgary factor.
We're in a spot where UFA is our only option this offseason, so I'm not holding my breath on that lessonI would say, hopefully he learned his lessons and grow from it.
Lessons could be not letting assets walk and panic signs UFA or most importantly, getting the right fit for success in playoffs.
Walking away from Marner isn't running it back though, and while we don't know for sure, the fact that he has both Ferris as his agent and his own history of contract negotiation hardball I think it's a pretty good bet Marner will ask for a lot more than he is worth.Run it back. The Leafs played Florida better than anyone so far and even had them by the throat late in game 3. I ain't giving up on this group. Tweaks? Sure. Walk away from Marner if his demands are silly? Sure. But that's it.
We're about to be in the same spot with Marner.
Walking away from Marner isn't running it back though, and while we don't know for sure, the fact that he has both Ferris as his agent and his own history of contract negotiation hardball I think it's a pretty good bet Marner will ask for a lot more than he is worth.
I would not be surprised if the door is not closed on Marner. And I think there’s a hinge moment with Ferris on Benne
trueRun it back. The Leafs played Florida better than anyone so far and even had them by the throat late in game 3. I ain't giving up on this group. Tweaks? Sure. Walk away from Marner if his demands are silly? Sure. But that's it.
Oh I wouldn't be surprised if the door isn't closed yet, but I'd be even more surprised if a GM who tried to trade him at the deadline would be willing now to pay him the moon unless directed to by his superiors.I would not be surprised if the door is not closed on Marner. And I think there’s a hinge moment with Ferris on Bennett.
There's a pretty big gap between Marner and the names there. I'd also add a gap between the Gaudreau and MTs of the world and that group.Sure, it’s not great but this isn’t a Treliving issue since he didn’t sign Marner to an NMC or guarantee him no move walking him into his protection years as that was done before his hiring.
Leafs Shanaplan era has basically walked everyone to free agency.
Bozak
JVR
Gardiner
Komarov
Andersen
Hyman
Campbell
Bunting
There's a pretty big gap between Marner and the names there. I'd also add a gap between the Gaudreau and MTs of the world and that group.
He didn't sign the NMC, but he was aware of it and did have his window to move/make decisions.
And "the Calgary factor" doesn't seem to carry over to many other areas that I can remember. I look at dumps like Winnipeg who were able to resign Scheif and Helle or Buffalo resigning Eichel (only to piss it away on the Doctor issue)
Again, seems like a lot of excuses without much substance on those issues.
I guess we'll see what he does this summer, but my hopes aren't high given what we've seen and what assets we've already pissed away
At least some times the games are out of reach early so you can bail out early. Lol
Oh I wouldn't be surprised if the door isn't closed yet, but I'd be even more surprised if a GM who tried to trade him at the deadline would be willing now to pay him the moon unless directed to by his superiors.
If Pelley forces Treliving into something like that, well, no use worrying about it because if the non-hockey guy is making granular hockey decisions on a regular basis we are screwed regardless.
I can’t see them becoming a contender through free agency.I see it as a game of musical chairs playing out with a finite supply of UFAs. If there isn’t a compelling mix of guys we can grab to really change it up I could see Rogers conservative mentality meeting Marner’s bluff and it all gets locked into a new contract.
If Treliving reports to Pelley how can Pelley evaluate Treliving’s performance as a hockey GM? And will Berube still have access to his boss’s boss, if so, that’s a disaster waiting to happen.Oh I wouldn't be surprised if the door isn't closed yet, but I'd be even more surprised if a GM who tried to trade him at the deadline would be willing now to pay him the moon unless directed to by his superiors.
If Pelley forces Treliving into something like that, well, no use worrying about it because if the non-hockey guy is making granular hockey decisions on a regular basis we are screwed regardless.
Fox was just a throw in for that trade. Treliving wasted an early 3rd round pick on a player who had told them he didn’t want to sign with them.He traded Hamilton. Fox. Ferland. And got back Lindholm and Hanifin who were both drafted 5th overall. That’s a straight up up hockey 2.5 for 2 piece hockey trade.
“Wasted the (3rd round) pick.”
That’s the cost of getting rid of Hamilton, guy bounces around like a ping pong ball and there’s a good reason why………He traded Hamilton. Fox. Ferland. And got back Lindholm and Hanifin who were both drafted 5th overall. That’s a straight up up hockey 2.5 for 2 piece hockey trade.
“Wasted the (3rd round) pick.”
If Treliving reports to Pelley how can Pelley evaluate Treliving’s performance as a hockey GM? And will Berube still have access to his boss’s boss, if so, that’s a disaster waiting to happen.
Everyone reports to someone but safe to say Pelley won’t be making hockey decisions.Why does Treliving report to anyone? And who the hell is Pelley? Why do we need more than a coach and a GM? I remember when Pat Quinn was both coach and GM and basically told Richard Peddie to stay out of the hockey operations end of the business. Worked a lot better. I've worked for 30 years now and one of the worst things about business is design by committee. Everyone needs to prove how smart they are by having their say and nothing gets done.
If I was pres of MLSE, I wouldn't have a president of hockey operations, I would trust my GM to get the job done. Or not and ditch them. Either way.
Everyone reports to someone but safe to say Pelley won’t be making hockey decisions.
Shanahan was in a different role than Pelley and had a hockey background, it would be expected that someone in his role would have input.And we'll always wonder how many decisions Shanahan made. Might be possible our last 3 GMs were slightly handcuffed. I doubt it will ever come out.
Dubas certainly indicated that was the case as he pushed for more autonomy.And we'll always wonder how many decisions Shanahan made. Might be possible our last 3 GMs were slightly handcuffed. I doubt it will ever come out.
Why not? They have 3/4 of a competitive team already. Treliving doesn't have to complete the team on July 1st. He can use his cap space at the trade deadline 2026.I can’t see them becoming a contender through free agency.
I still think they need 2 or 3 top 6, talented players that can drive the team, in addition to a few bottom 6 guys. There’s not enough of those types available, if any.Why not? They have 3/4 of a competitive team already. Treliving doesn't have to complete the team on July 1st. He can use his cap space at the trade deadline 2026.