Triumph
Registered User
- Oct 2, 2007
- 14,034
- 14,997
Tons of kids in the NCAA do a post-grad year in Prepschool, an extra year in the BCHL or USHL...age is a meaningless in the NCAA, at least the way it means something in junior anyhow. Miles Wood is 1995 birth there are only 6 kids on the team born after 1995 on the team...browse Hockey East and look how many players are over 22 years old. UMass Lowell has 8 players on their team born 1992 or before and there are plenty of older men in NCAA.
The age dominance factor is nonexistent in NCAA hockey like it is in junior hockey.
Age is an enormous factor in any league below the NHL.
'There are only 6 kids born after 1995' - haha what classic massive disinginuety. Here's how BC's roster breaks down:
4 Seniors
10 Juniors
2 Sophomores
8 Freshmen
So yes, of the 10 people eligible to have been born after 1995, only 6 are.
I mean, the above quote from the Boston College hockey blog "I'm not saying Wood or White are as good as Eichel but no one was expecting either of them to come here and be the top two players in Hockey East so early in their careers" certainly tells a different tale. I can't say I've watched any of Wood's games this season but I'll take it from someone who probably has. I don't think he's as far off as you're suggesting.
I take anything from non-scouts who watch lower levels of hockey regularly with enormous grains of salt because they typically watch way more of that level of hockey than the NHL and they don't understand what the jump from one to the other is like. Eichel's performance is ridiculously dominant, he was 18 and was by far the best player in the Hockey East. Wood seems like he's jumped in and been a good 1st liner. That's nice and puts him on a possible NHL track. That's all.