CHL can now play NCAA - change everything !

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Again with the assumptions. It's more likely he went because Tri City didn't think he was ready for the USHL and the kid thought he was ready. Based on his start in Halifax, it seems that Tri City was right.

My assumption is that he will most likely not report to Tri City next year even if Tri City wants him. I will wager that we will see a lot more Americans in the Q, the O and the Dub who would have gone to the USHL but chose not to in order to play in the CHL.

Fortunately, we will all be able to see the data next September and we will no longer have to call them assumptions.

They likely gave him an NTC. It’s something that can happen with American or high end prospects in the CHL.

I would assume that yes, NTC will be the order of the day for most high-end U.S. prospects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA
They likely gave him an NTC. It’s something that can happen with American or high end prospects in the CHL.
Yeah makes sense. What a huge win for the most desirable CHL teams. They can throw relatively low draft capital at good American players and have a good chance to bring them in while most of their competitors won’t be able to draft players at all if they’re too risky to bring in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigdog16
My assumption is that he will most likely not report to Tri City next year even if Tri City wants him. I will wager that we will see a lot more Americans in the Q, the O and the Dub who would have gone to the USHL but chose not to in order to play in the CHL.

Fortunately, we will all be able to see the data next September and we will no longer have to call them assumptions.



I would assume that yes, NTC will be the order of the day for most high-end U.S. prospects.
There is no doubt we will see more Americans, considering just last year there was the lowest amount of Americans in the CHL in the past 21 years, and a 55% drop in Americans since 2015. I'm still not convinced many 16 year old Americans make the jump though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA
There is no doubt we will see more Americans, considering just last year there was the lowest amount of Americans in the CHL in the past 21 years, and a 55% drop in Americans since 2015. I'm still not convinced many 16 year old Americans make the jump though.

I get the sense that more than just a few top 16-year-old Americans will jump to the CHL next year but the rest (of the best if you will) will wait until their 17-year-old season.
 
U -18 use to be really great hockey i think what 5-10 years ago . Prep hockey as everybody knows use to be unbelievable hockey . U -16 was still great hockey but has gotten watered down because ntdp and ushl tenders . U -18 right now is almost unplayable if you want play div 1 hockey in the future . Prep hockey after age 16 is unplayable if you want play div 1 hockey in the future . U -16 is just about to blow up too in my view from ntdp , ushl , chl kids plus i really think BCHL just gets really younger and becomes feeding ground for Mostly CHL and maybe ushl . Shattick is also completely done i think at u -16-18 too in the future . The top kids are going chase their dreams and they are leaving home now at age 16 . I don’t care about last year or this year but the trend has been down for u -18-16 and prep but new rule will completely destroy it in my view .
Unless all these leagues decide to play and roster a bunch of U16 players en masse then I dont see this happening. You still need a U16-U18 minor hockey path for these kids to play and develop in before junior. The kids who are too good for AAA/Prep dont stay there anyway and its been that way for a while.
 
Yeah makes sense. What a huge win for the most desirable CHL teams. They can throw relatively low draft capital at good American players and have a good chance to bring them in while most of their competitors won’t be able to draft players at all if they’re too risky to bring in.
No. The powerhouse teams won't able to hoard American players like they use to anymore. No more getting a high end player in rounds 7, 8, and beyond. These drafts are going to be near BPA from now on. Now you still need to run your franchise in a respectable way and not be a total clown show, but historically ignored teams will be able to get these NCAA types now.
 
There is no doubt we will see more Americans, considering just last year there was the lowest amount of Americans in the CHL in the past 21 years, and a 55% drop in Americans since 2015. I'm still not convinced many 16 year old Americans make the jump though.
Agree. A decade+ ago it was super common for many of the NTDP to go CHL instead of college. Some of that was late birthday stuff because most U.S. schooling system have cutoffs more in line with the nhl draft than birth year (Kane and M. Tkachuk were both still in high school when they went to London) but also just the perceptions. I think we’ll see numbers more resembling what it looked like back then. Not necessarily high end NTDP kids who probably still go ncaa (the ones who aren’t ready for ncaa likely go for a stopgap in CHL over USHL though).

More Americans in CHL is obvious. The much more controversial position is that these changes mean no more high end draft picks in ncaa. Why would ncaa teams even want their recruits playing in CHL at all if after a few drafts, signing cycles, the only ones that ever actually make it to campus are the rejects that got passed over and didn’t get a pro hockey contract passed the age of 21? Even the late bloomers, undrafted sleeper are usually getting pro contracts by 21/22 or else they’re just too old. So they’d get the triple late bloomers CHL kid for one year before they have one last chance of getting signed? Doesn’t make sense.

The good schools will no doubt want to get their good commits onto campus far before age 21, and if a kid wants to play college hockey, they certainly will as well. Speculating on when a specific NTDP cut will make the ncaa jump is basically impossible right now because we don’t know how good the kid will be in 2-3 years or if a team would want him by then. If by then he’s a draft pick, the team will certainly be clamoring to get him on board. If the end result is a kid like that straight up never comes, they’d stop recruiting those guys until the class is being finalized and they have a spot open for a 21 year old reject that can be nonetheless helpful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigdog16
No. The powerhouse teams won't able to hoard American players like they use to anymore. No more getting a high end player in rounds 7, 8, and beyond. These drafts are going to be near BPA from now on. Now you still need to run your franchise in a respectable way and not be a total clown show, but historically ignored teams will be able to get these NCAA types now.
No. The powerhouse teams won't able to hoard American players like they use to anymore. No more getting a high end player in rounds 7, 8, and beyond. These drafts are going to be near BPA from now on. Now you still need to run your franchise in a respectable way and not be a total clown show, but historically ignored teams will be able to get these NCAA types now.
Only really makes sense if kids view CHL as *mandatory* in order to play NCAA if they don’t make the NTDP, which *could* happen. In that case they’d have to just accept their lot wherever they go like Canadian kids did thirty years ago. However, there remains a high possibility that the USHL doesn’t spontaneously combust and there’s likely still enough older domestic talent to keep it competitive, especially with all the kids not high on the radar at 15 that emerge in their later teen years, which if you look through active American nhl players that weren’t ex NTDP is very common.

At the end of the day, USHL likely remains the top domestic league and is at a fairly lean 15 proper teams at the moment, and if kids are buried or don’t like their spot in the CHL, will likely still be able to go there as well. I’m sure everyone playing there now is weighing their options and getting a sense of what other players are going to do.
 
Only really makes sense if kids view CHL as *mandatory* in order to play NCAA if they don’t make the NTDP, which *could* happen. In that case they’d have to just accept their lot wherever they go like Canadian kids did thirty years ago. However, there remains a high possibility that the USHL doesn’t spontaneously combust and there’s likely still enough older domestic talent to keep it competitive, especially with all the kids not high on the radar at 15 that emerge in their later teen years, which if you look through active American nhl players that weren’t ex NTDP is very common.

At the end of the day, USHL likely remains the top domestic league and is at a fairly lean 15 proper teams at the moment, and if kids are buried or don’t like their spot in the CHL, will likely still be able to go there as well. I’m sure everyone playing there now is weighing their options and getting a sense of what other players are going to do.
None of those decisions on where to play are going to be from the lens of "*mandatory* in order to play NCAA if they don’t make the NTDP". Its going to be "what's best for my development?". For a lot of the higher end guys, the CHL is going to be a better option for exposure and playing time against better junior aged players than the USHL. CHL teams know this and will have little to no incentive to pass on these players. If they want to play in the CHL, they'll play for us. And most kids are going to be ok with that. The whole idea before was "I better be damn sure I'm going to a strong program if I'm burning my NCAA chance." Now they can always jump back to the USHL if their CHL team truly isn't giving them the opportunity they want.

Now again, that doesn't mean 75% of Americans are coming to the CHL. Indeed the USHL will be the predominate league for Americans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA
No. The powerhouse teams won't able to hoard American players like they use to anymore. No more getting a high end player in rounds 7, 8, and beyond. These drafts are going to be near BPA from now on. Now you still need to run your franchise in a respectable way and not be a total clown show, but historically ignored teams will be able to get these NCAA types now.

For the most part yes. The soon to be implemented minimum standards that OHL franchises must adhere to will "fix" problems found currently in franchises like Niagra but the isolated markets, like a Val-Dor will still have problems in attracting talent. The upside for a market such as that is as more and more high end American talent dot the rosters of Halifax, Moncton, Quebec ect, more higher end Canadian talent will be available to the Val-Dor's of the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA
None of those decisions on where to play are going to be from the lens of "*mandatory* in order to play NCAA if they don’t make the NTDP". Its going to be "what's best for my development?". For a lot of the higher end guys, the CHL is going to be a better option for exposure and playing time against better junior aged players than the USHL. CHL teams know this and will have little to no incentive to pass on these players. If they want to play in the CHL, they'll play for us. And most kids are going to be ok with that. The whole idea before was "I better be damn sure I'm going to a strong program if I'm burning my NCAA chance." Now they can always jump back to the USHL if their CHL team truly isn't giving them the opportunity they want.

Now again, that doesn't mean 75% of Americans are coming to the CHL. Indeed the USHL will be the predominate league for Americans.
Not sure if we’re talking passed each other here. Yeah everyone will get a bit more but I think my central point is any time kids have options, that is going to benefit the top disproportionately. If ushl is seen as dead end, then yes, “best for development” is whatever CHL team holds your rights.

Particularly if we’re talking QMJHL for Boston area kids, where there’s a language barrier. The QMJHL as a whole needs to step up its nhl draft production imo before “any” QMJHL team is seen as inherently most desirable for development.
 
Not sure if we’re talking passed each other here. Yeah everyone will get a bit more but I think my central point is any time kids have options, that is going to benefit the top disproportionately. If ushl is seen as dead end, then yes, “best for development” is whatever CHL team holds your rights.

Particularly if we’re talking QMJHL for Boston area kids, where there’s a language barrier. The QMJHL as a whole needs to step up its nhl draft production imo before “any” QMJHL team is seen as inherently most desirable for development.
Give it 5 or so years. The Q will catch right up with the other 2 leagues especially when they get an American footprint again in NH and/or Maine.
 
I get the sense that more than just a few top 16-year-old Americans will jump to the CHL next year but the rest (of the best if you will) will wait until their 17-year-old season.
Unless the U17 team disbands, which won't happen next season, I have an extremely hard time seeing the likes of Pelosi, Fitzhenry, Scuderi, Meyer, Sears, etc. go to the CHL next year. I am hearing the same from inside the rinks also.

You are hanging your hat on Will Bent, a player who was cut from NTDP. Keep that in mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wieters and NTDP
More Americans in CHL is obvious. The much more controversial position is that these changes mean no more high end draft picks in ncaa. Why would ncaa teams even want their recruits playing in CHL at all if after a few drafts, signing cycles, the only ones that ever actually make it to campus are the rejects that got passed over and didn’t get a pro hockey contract passed the age of 21? Even the late bloomers, undrafted sleeper are usually getting pro contracts by 21/22 or else they’re just too old. So they’d get the triple late bloomers CHL kid for one year before they have one last chance of getting signed? Doesn’t make sense.
I think that a not insignificant amount of NHL teams though will stop trying to get every CHL guy to sign immediately, especially if there's a standardization of the period you hold drafted rights to a prospect for regardless of drafted league or if the CHL/AHL agreement doesn't change significantly. Maybe your late first rounder plays another year in the CHL for their D+1 and then goes and plays college for their D+2.
 
Unless the U17 team disbands, which won't happen next season, I have an extremely hard time seeing the likes of Pelosi, Fitzhenry, Scuderi, Meyer, Sears, etc. go to the CHL next year. I am hearing the same from inside the rinks also.

You are hanging your hat on Will Bent, a player who was cut from NTDP. Keep that in mind.

I never said that the NTDP will disband next season, but if you are in the rinks then surely you must have heard the talk that there is a possibility that the program goes to one team.

I still get the feeling that the NTDP will get the majority of its targets but there will be more than usual who may decline.

It is the next group that I am looking at for next year. Pretty well much all of the talk I'm hearing is that the CHL is a definite possibility for many of them.

Let's keep an eye on the upcoming CHL drafts. If you see the majority of Americans picked in the latter half as flyer picks then you are correct and that most U.S. kids will remain on the Prep-USHL to the NCAA route. If, however, you see a lot of Americans picked within the first half then we can expect that they will be taking the CHL to the NCAA route.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA
Depending on how his schooling is set up (semesters, quarters, trimesters), now could have been a natural point for him to make the move as opposed to earlier. His USHL team could have nothing to do with it.
Anything is theoretically possible. Given the odd timing of him joining Halifax and that we’ve essentially never seen a prospect of any note from the USA join a team in the Q, I’m going to go with this wasn’t plan A.
 
None of those decisions on where to play are going to be from the lens of "*mandatory* in order to play NCAA if they don’t make the NTDP". Its going to be "what's best for my development?". For a lot of the higher end guys, the CHL is going to be a better option for exposure and playing time against better junior aged players than the USHL. CHL teams know this and will have little to no incentive to pass on these players. If they want to play in the CHL, they'll play for us. And most kids are going to be ok with that. The whole idea before was "I better be damn sure I'm going to a strong program if I'm burning my NCAA chance." Now they can always jump back to the USHL if their CHL team truly isn't giving them the opportunity they want.

Now again, that doesn't mean 75% of Americans are coming to the CHL. Indeed the USHL will be the predominate league for Americans.
The issue with this is it’s quite clear the Q does not fit into that “better than the USHL” argument. It is not a better league. This is proven year in, year out by NHL draft picks.

I could actually buy it’s a somewhat legit argument to those in O and W territories. Then again, we’ll see if it can sway anyone. But I would not combine the three because that leads to a statement that is partially inaccurate.
 
I never said that the NTDP will disband next season, but if you are in the rinks then surely you must have heard the talk that there is a possibility that the program goes to one team.

I still get the feeling that the NTDP will get the majority of its targets but there will be more than usual who may decline.

It is the next group that I am looking at for next year. Pretty well much all of the talk I'm hearing is that the CHL is a definite possibility for many of them.

Let's keep an eye on the upcoming CHL drafts. If you see the majority of Americans picked in the latter half as flyer picks then you are correct and that most U.S. kids will remain on the Prep-USHL to the NCAA route. If, however, you see a lot of Americans picked within the first half then we can expect that they will be taking the CHL to the NCAA route.

"a definite possibility for many of them" is a nice way to hedge that you don't actually know anything and are just speculating.. but yes, I'm sure all kids are weighing their options, especially in terms of backup plans if they think they are ready for Junior Hockey but don't make the NTDP

I'll try

"Pretty much all the talk I'm hearing is that it's a definite possibility for many top-half of the first rounders currently playing in the CHL that they'll have high six figure NIL deals to lure them to NCAA next season"
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Hockeyville USA
I never said that the NTDP will disband next season, but if you are in the rinks then surely you must have heard the talk that there is a possibility that the program goes to one team.

I still get the feeling that the NTDP will get the majority of its targets but there will be more than usual who may decline.

It is the next group that I am looking at for next year. Pretty well much all of the talk I'm hearing is that the CHL is a definite possibility for many of them.

Let's keep an eye on the upcoming CHL drafts. If you see the majority of Americans picked in the latter half as flyer picks then you are correct and that most U.S. kids will remain on the Prep-USHL to the NCAA route. If, however, you see a lot of Americans picked within the first half then we can expect that they will be taking the CHL to the NCAA route.
I haven't heard any talk of them trimming a team. Realistically, the only place I have seen that is here on HFBoards. I will be shocked if any of the top end kids from New England jump to the Q. I am sure there will be borderline kids who choose the CHL route, The Little Caesars are part of the OHL Cup and are getting mass exposure to that route, so if a few of them went that route it wouldn't surprise me. But the 17s at NTDP should be one of the best teams in years.
 
I haven't heard any talk of them trimming a team. Realistically, the only place I have seen that is here on HFBoards. I will be shocked if any of the top end kids from New England jump to the Q. I am sure there will be borderline kids who choose the CHL route, The Little Caesars are part of the OHL Cup and are getting mass exposure to that route, so if a few of them went that route it wouldn't surprise me. But the 17s at NTDP should be one of the best teams in years.

I have been hearing it since last summer and this rule change has only intensified that talk.
What top end kids are we referring to? Are we saying only those who will be invited to the NTDP? Or are we talking about the top 40 or so?
I do expect some top end kids to jump to the Q and honestly why wouldn't they?
 
I have been hearing it since last summer and this rule change has only intensified that talk.
What top end kids are we referring to? Are we saying only those who will be invited to the NTDP? Or are we talking about the top 40 or so?
I do expect some top end kids to jump to the Q and honestly why wouldn't they?
The average New Englander isn't going to leave the States, leave their prep school to go to a French speaking market. The Maritimes teams will benefit though most certainly.
 
Let's keep an eye on the upcoming CHL drafts. If you see the majority of Americans picked in the latter half as flyer picks then you are correct and that most U.S. kids will remain on the Prep-USHL to the NCAA route. If, however, you see a lot of Americans picked within the first half then we can expect that they will be taking the CHL to the NCAA route.
The Whl has a seperate draft for Americans within their rights territory since 2020. Which kids are drafted, and how high (it's only 2 rounds) might tell us a lot about any high profile guys moving to the dub.
I say might because some teams will take a flyer on an elite kid if they have no other players lined up. Recruiting is going to be a thing here for sure. Saskatoon took Zeev Buium with the last pick in round 1 in 2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyville USA

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad