belfour30
Blackhawks Fangirl
- Dec 14, 2019
- 2,087
- 1,796
To Blackhawks:
Shane Wright
To Seattle:
Nolan Allan
Roman Kantserov(rights)
Shane Wright
To Seattle:
Nolan Allan
Roman Kantserov(rights)
idk maybe I'm just really high on Kantserov. I also think Allan could be a 2nd pairing D.Another wright thread fir pennies on the dollar
To Blackhawks:
Shane Wright
To Seattle:
Nolan Allan
Roman Kantserov(rights)
Who's the 2nd pairing young D? Was there an edit I missed.No way Chicago moves a 2nd pairing young D and a prospect with top 6 “potential” for a 3rd line C.
“Prospect with top 6 potential”, yet Wright is only a 3rd line C? Great evaluation there.No way Chicago moves a 2nd pairing young D and a prospect with top 6 “potential” for a 3rd line C.
Allan gives me Jake McCabe vibes.Who's the 2nd pairing young D? Was there an edit I missed.
Allan gives me Jake McCabe vibes.
It's not.And that is a negative how?
If Allan fully develops into a McCabe that is great for Hawks
It's not.
guys as least be realistic if your going to offer something for wright make it Korchinski
Both first round early picks
Because you have to give to get?So why are you looking to move him on top of Kantserov?
Because you have to give to get?
Fair trades are ones where both fanbases think they got hosed.
I tried to come up with a trade that gets Wright without giving up Korchinski.
Wright is 20. They probably aren't going to move him now without an offer like thisIts not fair if Hawks are overpaying for a guy who is struggling badly right now at NHL level
As for Korchinski for Wright swap it doesn't make sense to move our best LD prospect for a C. We have Nazar/Boisvert/Moore/Mustard/Thompson/etc in system as is for C
If we are going for a reclamation project giving up Korchinski or your original offer are too steep a price considering Wright has major ? right now
Yeah then why would Seattle do the original deal. They are loaded at wingers. Short on centers. Allan has been nice so far and Kantserov is a nice Khl player.Because you have to give to get?
Fair trades are ones where both fanbases think they got hosed.
I tried to come up with a trade that gets Wright without giving up Korchinski.
I'm that high on Kantserov. I already said that I thought he could be better than Wright, but doesn't fit the Hawks roster construction. Wright is a better fit, even if he's only a middle 6er.Yeah then why would Seattle do the original deal. They are loaded at wingers. Short on centers. Allan has been nice so far and Kantserov is a nice Khl player.
Korchinski for wright if your looking
Would you take Korchinski?Two Chicago fans arguing over which "overpayment" is more fair to Chicago; meanwhile, neither of you have convinced any non-Chicago fans that either are fair to Seattle.
We'll keep Wright if this is the offer, thanks.
Would you take Korchinski?
It's a reluctant offer but if that's what it takes.
I would only offer Korchinski in a trade if its for David Jiricek. I am not giving up on another young Dman for a guy who has proven not to be NHL caliber. Jiricek for Korchinski is D for D AND TOP 10 SWAPSWould you take Korchinski?
It's a reluctant offer but if that's what it takes.
What do you mean by Allan is similar? As a prospect or playing for the Thunderbirds?I'd consider something but it's probably because I love Korchinski as a Thunderbirds fan (although I guess Allan is similar but less-tenured).
This is a fair take to have after the Jokiharju/A. Nylander debacle.I would only offer Korchinski in a trade if its for David Jiricek. I am not giving up on another young Dman for a guy who has proven not to be NHL caliber. Jiricek for Korchinski is D for D AND TOP 10 SWAPS