13pacheco31
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2014
- 2,178
- 1,081
They don't do that anymore. No such thing as re-entry waivers anymore eitherWhen they call a player back up and they go through re-entry waivers I believe is 50% or at least used to be.
They don't do that anymore. No such thing as re-entry waivers anymore eitherWhen they call a player back up and they go through re-entry waivers I believe is 50% or at least used to be.
thanksThey don't do that anymore. No such thing as re-entry waivers anymore either
I suppose Emily Kaplan is lying too.
There's still a huge burden of proof on the team to demonstrate that the proper response to the violation is termination instead of less severe discipline. A strict reading of that clause could make it pretty easy to terminate contracts.The NHL Standard Player Contract contains a list of things that the player promises to do, including:
(e) to conduct himself on and off the rink according to the highest standards of honesty, morality, fair play and sportsmanship, and to refrain from conduct detrimental to the best interest of the Club, the League or professional hockey generally.
During the intermission of the Canes-Flyers game Emily Kaplan said that from a source close to the situation the following occurred:I have no idea what you are referring to.
Basically what's in this story with Ryan ClarkDuring the intermission of the Canes-Flyers game Emily Kaplan said that from a source close to the situation the following occurred:
* Perry travelled with the team to Columbus
*There was an incident with a team employee
*Team employee immediately reported the incident
*Perry was immediately pulled from the expected lineup for the game (note in Columbus they played 11F-7D. The games before and after the standard 12-6)
The way this has been treated by the Hawks is pretty standard corporate America. Say the termination was a violation of policy with no detail and no identification of victim(s) if they exist. Heck it was the way the company I worked for dismissed an upper executive pegged to be the next CEO. He was terminated with cause effective immediately due to policy violation. That's it. That was the explanation internally and to Wall Street.
Given that this is going by the corporate HR playbook it is likely only a handful of things to lead to immediate termination - workplace violence, sexual harassment, under the influence at work (this doesn't seem to be the case) or moral/ethical violation that reflects poorly on the organization (this is normally something that is public. If it's not public it's not reflecting on the organization....we have no reports thus far of anything like this. Though police reports can be delayed for some time)
Davidson said the team was first notified of the allegations last week when the Blackhawks were in Columbus, Ohio, on Wednesday to play the Blue Jackets. Sources told ESPN's Emily Kaplan that Perry indeed traveled with the team to Columbus last Tuesday, a day before the game, and an incident occurred that day involving a team employee. Davidson said Perry, who did not play in the team's 7-3 loss, was "immediately pulled" from the game once the Blackhawks were notified, and at that point, the club began an investigation.
She hasn't said squat except it was an incident with an employee. Chelios's daughter? Is that true? Who knows?I suppose Emily Kaplan is lying too.
The future is weird man, people think a meme is funny so it gets spread on social media and eventually makes its way to actual news and people think it's real. This isn't the first time I've seen this although I can't think of a specific instance right now.Do people realize the Bedard mom story was literally made up by a reddit user?
Isn’t she simply repeating what was leaked to her though?
She hasn't said squat except it was an incident with an employee. Chelios's daughter? Is that true? Who knows?
(e) to conduct himself on and off the rink according to the highest standards of honesty, morality, fair play and sportsmanship, and to refrain from conduct detrimental to the best interest of the Club, the League or professional hockey generally.
A clause created by, and for, lawyers. To ensure that they will continue to make money until the sun stops shining.
If a player wishes to litigate it or file a grievance through the union absolutely. If is doing all the heavy lifting in that sentence though. If Perry wants to make this an issue it'll absolutely be an issue. If he doesn't he'll just take the 62% of his contract that's been paid out for 25% of the work and call it a career.There's still a huge burden of proof on the team to demonstrate that the proper response to the violation is termination instead of less severe discipline. A strict reading of that clause could make it pretty easy to terminate contracts.
Malort like deep dish is something people from Chicago have for tourists nobody actually drinks that garbage.Malort did all of this
The Seravalli timeline doesn't line up with what Kaplan reported. Kaplan is saying it was in Columbus and Seravalli is saying it was 4-5 days earlier. So one of these people is incorrect (or both only partially correct)...either the incident didn't occur in Nashville or the employee reporting it waited until Columbus to report it if we are to believe the full face value of the tellings.Frank Seravalli also reported it with more info about Perry being drunk at a sponsored event.
lol, Perry is a touristMalort like deep dish is something people from Chicago have for tourists nobody actually drinks that garbage.
Scoring 9 points in 16 games for a 38 years old is not bad, do you think he is open to come to the canucks for cheap?
Corey Perry has played a total of 35 career games against Ottawa, so I feel this should be an automatic loss of a first-round pick for the Sens.When does Ottawa find out how this affects their draft?