Bounces R Way
Registered User
Don't see why Colorado would do that but they've already squeezed Kenny for one pensioner. Why not another?
Very easy and hard no from the Avs.If MAF were to desire to move on to contender and if Avs decide to upgrade on Keumper
Trade #1
To
G Marc Andre Fleury (50% retained)
To
G Darcy Kuemper
Avalanche 2023 2nd round pick
Hawks then would flip Kuemper to Oilers
Trade #2
To
G Darcy Keumper
To
G Mikko Koskinen
Oilers 2024 3rd round pick
Both Avs and Oilers upgrade in net while Hawks get two picks towards rebuilding under what will probably be a new GM in offseason
All day long, but I don't see why the Avs make this deal though. They are just getting their stride now and Kuemper is playing well, so a change like this makes no sense for them. The Oilers will give the same pick for MA fleury if there is that option. We are not getting a long term solution, so a 2nd is as high as i would go given his age, but a change is needed right now and this move would accomplish this.Done for the Oilers.
I think you have to take the quality of team around the goalie into considerationGarbage for colorado.
Kuemper is better than Fleury this year and younger, add the 2nd pick on top of that and wow. Pure trash.
Colorado should target an upgrade on Kuemper.
how is it the oilers get to dump koskinen and pick up kuemper for only a third round pick ? that's not happening. try a first maybe
Fleury(50% retained) for Mikko Koskinen, Tyler Tulio and 2023 2nd.
This off season the Oilers can throw Jack Campbell a serious offer
I think the Avs' goal should be to form a more reliable tandem with Darcy as a part of it, so this doesn't really make a lot of sense.
You/re right about the concern over the fact that Francouz is made of glass.
But the only reason this would be an easy no is because of sunk costs. If the Avs hadn't traded a 1st and Timmins for Kuemper, this becomes much more viable. Yes, it's true that sunk costs shouldn't drive decisions but that's easier said than done. And with that in mind, the Avs would have essentially traded the 2022 1st, Timmins, an a 2023 2nd for MAF.
In being fair, there's no way Vegas was ever going to trade MAF to the Avs. So you make peace with this reality too.
Fleury(50% retained) for Mikko Koskinen, Tyler Tulio and 2023 2nd.
This off season the Oilers can throw Jack Campbell a serious offer
hmmmm.....OKstill a No from Blackhawks..your asking them to eat contract take on a worthless goalie and only get a 2nd rd pick...ya not cutting it..maybe up the ante with someone like Lavoie and change the 2nd rd pick to a 4th rd pick and keep other parameters the same.
Lavoie is not a particularly good prospect. He’s a 0.42 ppg AHL guy. 10 points in 24 games is it.hmmmm.....OK
Koskinen, Lavoie, and a 4th for MAF(50%)
Lavoie is not a particularly good prospect. He’s a 0.42 ppg AHL guy. 10 points in 24 games is it.
Was almost an overager when drafted so he’s already 21. He’s a B rated prospect at best.
I see him as a B prospect. He is closer to trying to make a run at an NHL position that a guy draft last or this year in the 2nd or 3rd rounds. He has talent but he is pretty inconsistent.
Avs fans, would you trade for MAF at 50% for Frankie and the Avs 2023 2nd?
I wouldn’t trade Kuemper straight up for MAF at 50%. But would I tandem them? Sure.
Yes but idk if I go near Francouz if I'm Chicago and I'm already losing a keeper.Avs fans, would you trade for MAF at 50% for Frankie and the Avs 2023 2nd?
I wouldn’t trade Kuemper straight up for MAF at 50%. But would I tandem them? Sure.
Clearly they do it for the Avs 2nd round pick. Frankie is very good when healthy. He’s healthy.Yes but idk if I go near Francouz if I'm Chicago and I'm already losing a keeper.