Claypool
Registered User
- Jan 12, 2009
- 13,900
- 4,666
Maybe if Byram comes with a long-term extension for 8 years?4th overall is too much right?
Maybe if Byram comes with a long-term extension for 8 years?4th overall is too much right?
Bob Cole best line.EVERYTHING IS HAPPENING TODAY
Does this mean they're talking louder? Not mixing in jokes anymore? What?!?!
4th over all.
Bo was a 4th over all, so it would be a 4th over all + for Bo since he’s established.
Doesn’t Chicago have a lot of young dmen with potential?
Buffalo has drafted 5 RD in the last 3 drafts at 2,3,2,1,3Doesn’t Chicago have a lot of young dmen with potential?
We'll see. Jarmo is a crappy GM.I think it’s going to be good for Buffalo
fair but this is how Friedman breaks trades, should hit in a few minutesIsn’t it too soon to create this thread. Heating up— isn’t it hot in Chicago….
Yes but no LD with #1 potential or even real top pair sights. That's what he would fill and as an experienced D next to Lev or RinzelDoesn’t Chicago have a lot of young dmen with potential?
My guess Bedard for Byram...
Time to sell high on bedard before he crashes down next year
i agree, but i think Chicago's group has higher potential. Mrtka can still be part of the plan even if a RD like comes out. That's likelier than forwards or 4OA exachange for Byram imo.Buffalo has a deep RD prospect pool with both Mrtka (9 OSclast yr ) and Strbak ( 23 2nd) starting their ELCs. I woukdnt be surprised to see one in the Sabres in 27/28 so what they might get is short term.
theyre coming to TorontoDoesn’t Chicago have a lot of young dmen with potential?

I dont even care what the return is, if greenway is going to chicago. I can rub it in to every blackhawks fan cuz ive been dumping greenway to chicago for months now on puckpediaI wonder if Greenway will also be involved.