The AntiBob
Registered User
Byram is a LD, lev and rinzel are RD, unless they can play their off sideWhy target Byram when you already have Lev and Rinzel. And for 4th overall..
I don’t get the logic at all.
Byram is a LD, lev and rinzel are RD, unless they can play their off sideWhy target Byram when you already have Lev and Rinzel. And for 4th overall..
I don’t get the logic at all.
Because he wasn't going to sign here long term. He wants to be a #1 and get #1 PP time. That ain't happening in Buffalo with Dahlin. So rather than giving him his last RFA year after arb, you trade him now so you can get better value, like the #4 pick.Not sure why Buffalo does this as a team that’s supposed to be competing now. A player for player trade sure, but futures?![]()
This is one of those generational trades that brings the hfboards community together!I’ve never seen this many people agree on how bad a trade is on these boards.
I dont think its enough for a unicorn with a great contract99% of people here likely still think 4th OA for Knies is too much
As he exists today- a 40 point defenseman with some bad defensive habits.Yep, this is a classic here. Prospects being way overrated and actual players underrated.
they have a hard time signing star players so they always have to get one in the draft... or they can trade the 4th for somethingNot sure why Buffalo does this as a team that’s supposed to be competing now. A player for player trade sure, but futures?![]()
Not about what side. It’s about PP usage.Byram is a LD, lev and rinzel are RD, unless they can play their off side
Buffalo frees up the cap to now resign tuch so in reality they got tuch in the tradethe value is outstanding for Buffalo obviously, but I would be trying to trade the pick for a player now. Contract be damned, Byram was a considerable contributor to that team and wont easily be replaced for next season.
and a 7 x 12.5 mil contract attached to it.. or so was said.. who knows if its true.As he exists today- a 40 point defenseman with some bad defensive habits.
I’ve never seen this many people agree on how bad a trade is on these boards.
but what if they fail to re-sign Tuch? Why are you assuming that is a guarantee?Buffalo frees up the cap to now resign tuch so in reality they got tuch in the trade
Carels or Reid
Wild to pass that up
He’s a lower tier #1 guy in a system that pushes towards his strengths and the play is isolated in the offensive zone. When he’s asked to play defense, he very much crumbles his quality of play to a mid tier #3 defenseman.Not sure what is wrong with people's reactions on here.
He's a elite #1 D in the making. He was stuck behind Dahlin. 35 even strength points, 22 minutes a night, plays PK, plays PP2. Could potentially be a 70 points guy next year with #1 minutes. Steal for Chicago. Completely overcame his injuries too, two straight 82 games seasons.
30% chance Buffalo drafts someone as good as Byram at #4 at best.
Tough to process that one.and a 7 x 12.5 mil contract attached to it.. or so was said.. who knows if its true.
Not sure why Buffalo does this as a team that’s supposed to be competing now. A player for player trade sure, but futures?![]()
Crevier is pretty much a throw in.
byram doesn't have durability issues. he's played every game for buffalo since being traded here.Whoa. I know Byram had a good year and has plenty of draft pedigree to lean on himself...but with his durability issues, the 4th overall pick seems pretty heavy. Crevier and a very high 2nd rounder isn't nothing as ad-ons either.
I figured the Sabres would want to keep Byram and just keep building out the blueline with the step forward they took this year. But i suppose when someone puts an offer like that on the table, you jump on it. You also don't have to worry about overloading your salary structure on the back end so much.