Checkers III: The Age of Ulf

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vagrant

The Czech Condor
Feb 27, 2002
23,660
8,274
North Carolina
Visit site
there's an immense amount of frustration that a lot of players develop when things don't immediately come to them as first year professional players. we do a better job (barely) with the long view as it comes to player development than the guy in the actual situation. when you go from skating in the WJC among the best players in your age group in the world and acquit yourself really well and are a first line player on every team you've ever played on, not having a clearly defined role can be really frustrating and can cause you to question the decision to not play you more despite the objectivity in knowing there are more seasoned and better options on the roster, it can be tough to admit that to yourself if you're a competitor.

he's a year behind guys like Roy and Foegele and it's an important year for a player of his size and stature. Kuokkanen has a more clear path due to being the type of player that typically has immediate professional success with a pedigree of professional hockey and puck skills that keep him in offensive situations. he's behind those guys by merit but he's objectively not able to see that. then you mix in the guys like Zykov, Wallmark, Tolchinsky, Saarela, Miller, etc. and you quickly realize how little room there is for a player that has stumbled out of the blocks a bit. the reason he can't get any straight answers from the team is because that answer would be "you're blocked. sorry. we can't do anything about that until the big club elevates a few of these guys." not exactly the heart warming message you want to give to your first round pick, whose development should be an immediate priority. it's a unique situation and one we haven't encountered where we have some much actual prospect depth that it's tough for even a first round pick to get the icetime he needs to make some strides.

the good thing is that he's not content about his playing time situation. the better thing would be if he uses that as motivation to improve his game instead of an excuse for why it's not clicking for him.
 

A Star is Burns

Formerly Azor Aho
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2011
12,482
40,071
He may be frustrated, but he's coming on production wise. I think he has 6+2 in his last 9 games. It's unfortunate he feels he isn't being communicated with, but if he keeps producing, his time will come. It is a pretty stacked team offensively, so he may just have to wait his turn.
 

Hulkacaniac

You MUST
Jun 4, 2015
1,712
9,331
NC
Canes and checkers with great wins
BlackBlissfulEider-max-1mb.gif
 

geehaad

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2006
7,515
18,909
I have to wonder about someone's mindset when they have these gripes and they don't address them with the coaching staff. If you have no idea why you're not playing, you should probably attempt to find out, because there's a reason in there somewhere and it's 94% likely to be something you're lacking.
 

A Star is Burns

Formerly Azor Aho
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2011
12,482
40,071
It's funny. You get a few of these interviews a year in another language, and it's like guys don't think about how easily stuff is translated and then spread to the masses, and they say stuff they likely wouldn't in an English interview. I'm sure there's some possibility of stuff being lost in translation too, but it just keeps happening over and over.
 

MinJaBen

Canes Sharks Boy
Sponsor
Dec 14, 2015
21,024
81,281
Durm
I have to wonder about someone's mindset when they have these gripes and they don't address them with the coaching staff. If you have no idea why you're not playing, you should probably attempt to find out, because there's a reason in there somewhere and it's 94% likely to be something you're lacking.

Yeah, I wonder about that too, then I remember he is a 20 year old kid. Talking about something that is bothering him with his boss may not be very easy for him.
 

Anton Babchuk

Registered User
Nov 3, 2005
12,913
2,438
Raleigh-Durham
twitter.com
I understand the frustration. I mean, if this were the Checkers of 2 or 3 years ago where Chad LaRose, Brody Sutter and Brendan Woods were getting top six ice time he'd probably be playing 20 minutes a game by default. This is easily the most stacked our AHL team has ever been at the forward position; even better than '04-'05 or '10-'11. At the same time it's ridiculous to be publicly complaining 30 games into your 20 year old rookie season. It's not like he was totally dominant in junior hockey; he had just over a PPG as a physically mature 19 year old in the QMJHL. He's not going to be just handed ice time over a bunch of guys who are producing just because he was a 1st round pick.
 

MinJaBen

Canes Sharks Boy
Sponsor
Dec 14, 2015
21,024
81,281
Durm
Not the point. He's certainly entitled to **** up and learn from it -- but make no mistake, he's ****ing up.

Of course it's not the best way to handle this. And if he were a checkout clerk at the Dollar store, then he'd be fired and go get a job at Food Lion or something. But he's a 20 year old who is making way more than that and is a valuable asset to the organization. Thus, they should probably do a better job of addressing this than to let him wallow in his own mistakes.
 

Navin R Slavin

Fifth line center
Jan 1, 2011
16,270
64,112
Durrm NC
Of course it's not the best way to handle this. And if he were a checkout clerk at the Dollar store, then he'd be fired and go get a job at Food Lion or something. But he's a 20 year old who is making way more than that and is a valuable asset to the organization. Thus, they should probably do a better job of addressing this than to let him wallow in his own mistakes.

Sorry. I think he needs to take a little ownership. Clearly you disagree.
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
27,226
85,023
there's an immense amount of frustration that a lot of players develop when things don't immediately come to them as first year professional players. we do a better job (barely) with the long view as it comes to player development than the guy in the actual situation. when you go from skating in the WJC among the best players in your age group in the world and acquit yourself really well and are a first line player on every team you've ever played on, not having a clearly defined role can be really frustrating and can cause you to question the decision to not play you more despite the objectivity in knowing there are more seasoned and better options on the roster, it can be tough to admit that to yourself if you're a competitor.

he's a year behind guys like Roy and Foegele and it's an important year for a player of his size and stature. Kuokkanen has a more clear path due to being the type of player that typically has immediate professional success with a pedigree of professional hockey and puck skills that keep him in offensive situations. he's behind those guys by merit but he's objectively not able to see that. then you mix in the guys like Zykov, Wallmark, Tolchinsky, Saarela, Miller, etc. and you quickly realize how little room there is for a player that has stumbled out of the blocks a bit. the reason he can't get any straight answers from the team is because that answer would be "you're blocked. sorry. we can't do anything about that until the big club elevates a few of these guys." not exactly the heart warming message you want to give to your first round pick, whose development should be an immediate priority. it's a unique situation and one we haven't encountered where we have some much actual prospect depth that it's tough for even a first round pick to get the icetime he needs to make some strides.

the good thing is that he's not content about his playing time situation. the better thing would be if he uses that as motivation to improve his game instead of an excuse for why it's not clicking for him.

Moreover there's the "marketing" angle, as in marketing of yourself: as you said, they are and are supposed to be competitors. If you go around too freely saying that there are plenty of guys better than you, you're giving the optics of giving in there already.

I follow Formula Ones, and with two drivers on each team it's kind of not-many-moving-pieces study on how the guys, who hitheretoforth have been the top in their class, deal with the competition at the top level when the competition has similar background, especially towards the public.

Even if you think or know the other guys are better, you ******* don't go publicly admitting it. Even playing dum is lesser evil, to an extent. There is obviously the possibility that messaging towards the public has a different spin than that towards the team management, who you can subtly let understand that you're vaguely aware that they are in misconception that the 1C is better player than you and that it's a challenge for you and you are up for it.

Who knows, you may even manage to yank for yourself a place to show. Not so if mellow and accepting.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad