Proposal: CGY makes moves to acquire 10 and 11

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,210
1,514
CGY has some nice pieces on their roster. The Devils and Sabres have stated that their picks (10 and 11 respectively) are in play.

With that in mind, what sorts of moves could CGY make to acquire those picks?

Markstrom with retention + 2nd for NJ’s 10th overall?

Andersson for BUF’s 11th overall+one of their many forward prospects?

Having 9, 10, 11 in this draft could allow CGY to land a core for the team going forward. Iginla, Catton, Buium + the prospect from Buffalo. I’m thinking they could rebuild through one draft the way Dallas did with the Heiskanen/Robertson/Otter draft.
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
18,278
16,431
Calgary
Andersson deal is realistic, but there isn't a chance in hell Jersey gives up a 10th for Marky imo regardless of the retention or picks added (unless its half our draft).
 

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,946
3,843
Sabres <-- Kadri, Andersson

Flames <-- #11, Skinner, Rosen


If Calgary is rebuilding, they may as well swap 5 years of Kadri for 3 years of Skinner

If Buffalo is looking to contend, Kadri gives their lineup a significant upgrade down the middle
 

Washed Up 29YearOld

Bro Do You Even Hockey?
Apr 29, 2018
1,319
1,887
Buffalo NY
Sabres <-- Kadri, Andersson

Flames <-- #11, Skinner, Rosen


If Calgary is rebuilding, they may as well swap 5 years of Kadri for 3 years of Skinner

If Buffalo is looking to contend, Kadri gives their lineup a significant upgrade down the middle
Looks good except good luck getting Jeff to waive for anywhere not Toronto. He wants to stay close to home, allegedly a big reason he reupped in Buffalo. Otherwise, great offer assuming retainment on Kadri.
 

Fjordy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
17,286
9,534
Sabres <-- Kadri, Andersson

Flames <-- #11, Skinner, Rosen


If Calgary is rebuilding, they may as well swap 5 years of Kadri for 3 years of Skinner

If Buffalo is looking to contend, Kadri gives their lineup a significant upgrade down the middle
I'd prefer Coleman instead Kadri.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,449
29,724
CGY has some nice pieces on their roster. The Devils and Sabres have stated that their picks (10 and 11 respectively) are in play.

With that in mind, what sorts of moves could CGY make to acquire those picks?

Markstrom with retention + 2nd for NJ’s 10th overall?

Andersson for BUF’s 11th overall+one of their many forward prospects?

Having 9, 10, 11 in this draft could allow CGY to land a core for the team going forward. Iginla, Catton, Buium + the prospect from Buffalo. I’m thinking they could rebuild through one draft the way Dallas did with the Heiskanen/Robertson/Otter draft.

If Andersson is available the Leafs will be competitive with that. They could trade Marner for futures and then move those futures for Andersson if that is what the Flames want.
 

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,946
3,843
Looks good except good luck getting Jeff to waive for anywhere not Toronto. He wants to stay close to home, allegedly a big reason he reupped in Buffalo. Otherwise, great offer assuming retainment on Kadri.
Let's keep it real... Skinner re-signed because the Sabres were willing to pay him 9 million a season, and his agent probably threatened to quit if he didn't accept the offer
 

MisterT

Registered User
Nov 29, 2006
1,467
1,347
It would take A LOT for New Jersey to move #10 to Calgary. If Calgary wants that pick, Fitzgerald is likely asking for the below in return:

- Markstrom - 50% retained
- Blake Coleman - 50% retained
- 28th overall

Even that might not be enough to get the 10th pick.
No one would pay that for #10 in this draft class. Retention x2 is a stupid ask and I strongly doubt Fitzgerald is that stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MNRube and hurdemz

FLAMESFAN

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
5,395
1,304
It would take A LOT for New Jersey to move #10 to Calgary. If Calgary wants that pick, Fitzgerald is likely asking for the below in return:

- Markstrom - 50% retained
- Blake Coleman - 50% retained
- 28th overall

Even that might not be enough to get the 10th pick.
I think retention would only be needed on Markstrom. That trade would significantly improve NJ.
 

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,210
1,514
Andersson deal is realistic, but there isn't a chance in hell Jersey gives up a 10th for Marky imo regardless of the retention or picks added (unless it’s half our draft).
Clock isn’t ticking in Jersey for them to be in a rush to trade the 10th pick but I feel like they’d consider consider Markstrom at 50% + 28th overall for 10th overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zubrus Coffee Maker

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,119
5,524
Sabres <-- Kadri, Andersson

Flames <-- #11, Skinner, Rosen


If Calgary is rebuilding, they may as well swap 5 years of Kadri for 3 years of Skinner

If Buffalo is looking to contend, Kadri gives their lineup a significant upgrade down the middle

Except that Kadri is good and has a great influence on the youth. Skinner is also making more money. $27 million total vs. $35 million. Pretty similar numbers. Calgary's not doing that.

As you state Kadri is a "significant upgrade down the middle". He plays a playoff style game. He's in demand. Whoever takes him on, does so knowing the last couple of years could be bad, but it's an overall wash. Skinner is a cap dump now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nanuuk

Forge

Blissfully Mediocre
Jul 4, 2018
13,232
16,461
Vincent Clortho School for wizards
CGY has some nice pieces on their roster. The Devils and Sabres have stated that their picks (10 and 11 respectively) are in play.

With that in mind, what sorts of moves could CGY make to acquire those picks?

Markstrom with retention + 2nd for NJ’s 10th overall?

10 for Markstrom + 28 is when a deal starts to make sense for me value wise. I wouldn't do it if I were the devils, but I think you can at least support the value to some degree. I would require a bit more oomph in the offer to really start to consider it.

Ultimately, I do not think they are going to move 10 for Markstrom. Very much an outlier return. But there are avenues it can go down where at least the value is okay.
 

Stephen Gionta

Boston College > Boston University
Jun 15, 2015
6,392
2,487
East Rutherford, NJ
No one would pay that for #10 in this draft class. Retention x2 is a stupid ask and I strongly doubt Fitzgerald is that stupid.

I think retention would only be needed on Markstrom. That trade would significantly improve NJ.

NJ fans are the new Habs fans

Never once said Conroy would accept that offer - just saying that's likely what Fitzgerald would ask for if Calgary called asking for the 10th pick.

Clock isn’t ticking in Jersey for them to be in a rush to trade the 10th pick but I feel like they’d consider consider Markstrom at 50% + 28th overall for 10th overall.
Don't think New Jersey would consider that at all.

The gap in value between the 10th pick and the 28th pick is massive. A 35 year old goaltender, albeit a good one, is not nearly enough value for NJ to move down 18 spots in Round 1.

As you said, the clock isn't ticking in NJ. Markstrom will not be the goalie that is going to be winning the Devils Stanley Cups. Markstrom could be the goalie to bridge them over for a couple years until they find that goalie.

Not at all worth giving up the 10th pick for a short term goaltending solution.
 

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,890
14,170
Toronto, Ontario
If Andersson is available the Leafs will be competitive with that. They could trade Marner for futures and then move those futures for Andersson if that is what the Flames want.

What team is giving up futures for Marner?

What team has room to add a $10+ winger 12 months from free agency?

And not only are they going to take on all that salary, but they are also going to surrender "futures" to do it?

What team would do this, and why does Marner waive his NMC to go there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDN24 and freester

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,449
29,724
What team is giving up futures for Marner?

What team has room to add a $10+ winger 12 months from free agency?

And not only are they going to take on all that salary, but they are also going to surrender "futures" to do it?

What team would do this, and why does Marner waive his NMC to go there?

I am not an insider, but Marner will have quite a few teams heavily interested.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: FerrisRox

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,210
1,514
The gap in value between the 10th pick and the 28th pick is massive. A 35 year old goaltender, albeit a good one, is not nearly enough value for NJ to move down 18 spots in Round 1.

As you said, the clock isn't ticking in NJ. Markstrom will not be the goalie that is going to be winning the Devils Stanley Cups. Markstrom could be the goalie to bridge them over for a couple years until they find that goalie.

Not at all worth giving up the 10th pick for a short term goaltending solution.
Fair enough. Do you think there could be a deal there at all?

Coleman + Markstrom + 28th for 10th?
 

Stephen Gionta

Boston College > Boston University
Jun 15, 2015
6,392
2,487
East Rutherford, NJ
Fair enough. Do you think there could be a deal there at all?

Coleman + Markstrom + 28th for 10th?

I don't think there is a deal to be had between CGY and NJ that includes 10th overall - but this package would at least have the Devils thinking. If there could be some significant retention on those players, then I do think there is really something for NJ to consider.

At the end of the day, I think NJ will either keep the 10th pick, or use it in a trade for a younger asset that is under team control for a number of years. Someone like Robert Thomas or something. (Not saying STL would do this!)

I don't think it's Conroy who's calling.....

Then why the heck would NJ be calling Calgary about trading them the 10th pick? The literal title of this thread says "CGY making moves to acquire 10 and 11"
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,983
19,175
Sabres <-- Kadri, Andersson

Flames <-- #11, Skinner, Rosen


If Calgary is rebuilding, they may as well swap 5 years of Kadri for 3 years of Skinner

If Buffalo is looking to contend, Kadri gives their lineup a significant upgrade down the middle

Ya, no way is Calgary trading Kadri for Skinner, and no way is Skinner waiving his NMC to go to Calgary.

I actually like this one with those two guys removed, though.

Calgary: Andersson.

Sabres: 11th and Rosen.

Feels like Sabres could then move one of their many LD at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SB716

FLAMESFAN

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
5,395
1,304
Then why the heck would NJ be calling Calgary about trading them the 10th pick? The literal title of this thread says "CGY making moves to acquire 10 and 11"
It doesn't matter what the thread is called. Everyone knows it's Fitz that keeps calling and asking for Markstrom. He's got it on speed dial.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,643
10,639
Nova Scotia
CGY has some nice pieces on their roster. The Devils and Sabres have stated that their picks (10 and 11 respectively) are in play.

With that in mind, what sorts of moves could CGY make to acquire those picks?

Markstrom with retention + 2nd for NJ’s 10th overall?

Andersson for BUF’s 11th overall+one of their many forward prospects?

Having 9, 10, 11 in this draft could allow CGY to land a core for the team going forward. Iginla, Catton, Buium + the prospect from Buffalo. I’m thinking they could rebuild through one draft the way Dallas did with the Heiskanen/Robertson/Otter draft.
A lot of pressure for Conroy to get Iginla. Bukala was on Marek today. Said he's not getting past 5. Expect Calgary to offer 28 to switch picks with Montreal.
 

Torts

Registered User
Aug 21, 2009
2,698
352
Ontario
10 for Markstrom + 28 is when a deal starts to make sense for me value wise. I wouldn't do it if I were the devils, but I think you can at least support the value to some degree. I would require a bit more oomph in the offer to really start to consider it.

Ultimately, I do not think they are going to move 10 for Markstrom. Very much an outlier return. But there are avenues it can go down where at least the value is okay.
As a Devils fan I'd be ok with Markstrom + 28 for 10. Keeps us in the first round and improves goaltending.
 

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,946
3,843
Except that Kadri is good and has a great influence on the youth. Skinner is also making more money. $27 million total vs. $35 million. Pretty similar numbers. Calgary's not doing that.

As you state Kadri is a "significant upgrade down the middle". He plays a playoff style game. He's in demand. Whoever takes him on, does so knowing the last couple of years could be bad, but it's an overall wash. Skinner is a cap dump now.
So, Buffalo adds a 2nd... ?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad