NoIsn't this the dude who said he was going to be the best dman in the NHL last season?
You're overreacting. A player has to actively be a clear upgrade on a roster to be worth claiming. Yes he has potential but he's not there yet. Even if he does get claimed that team then can't waive him without Calgary just getting to take him back if there are no other claimsf***ing stupid decision by Conroy, he clearly hoping that there aren't enough injuries to d-men and thinks he can sneak him through... but with f***ing Tinordi, Barrie, Hanley & Bean still in camp, this is f***ing moronic.
Awful decision to waive him over the likes of Hanley or so they can sign Barrie. Solovyov's already a solid #6.
Isn't this the dude who said he was going to be the best dman in the NHL last season?
They currently have Barrie slotted in on the left side for reasonsSolo is LD. Barrie is RD affects the situation for Hanley (LD/RD), Miromanov and Pachal.
Bean, Bahl, Hanley and Tinordi are the guys who are involved with the Solo waiving and I have a feeling that one or two of those guys (last two names) will also be waived.
They currently have Barrie slotted in on the left side for reasons
8 dmen but just 13 forwards and 2 goalies making for a 23 man roster. No Coronato, Pelletier, or Honzek but Schwindt stays for some inexplicable reason.
I mean... you have a point there, but that's also 8 dmen.
IIRC we haven't officially signed Barrie yet, so maybe it's an audition to figure out if he can play both sides like Hanley prior to demoting someone or tabling an NHL contract? Hanley/Pachal or Barrie as #7, Bean 3rd pair LD, one of Hanley/Pachal/Barrie sent to be Wranglers top pairing?
Either way though, even without Barrie, I think someone needed to be sent down. Solo makes sense as the Wrangler's top pairing vs the #7 on the Flames (I can see the argument for Bean over Solo). Even if Solo is better than Hanley, the long term development/stagnation risk is worse.
I don't think I am. I've watched every game of his pro career. Conroy f***ed up.You're overreacting. A player has to actively be a clear upgrade on a roster to be worth claiming. Yes he has potential but he's not there yet. Even if he does get claimed that team then can't waive him without Calgary just getting to take him back if there are no other claims
I think Barrie gets signed and they chose Tinordi over Solo because he's basically a face puncher (more of a punchee if we're honest)
I mean... you have a point there, but that's also 8 dmen.
IIRC we haven't officially signed Barrie yet, so maybe it's an audition to figure out if he can play both sides like Hanley prior to demoting someone or tabling an NHL contract? Hanley/Pachal or Barrie as #7, Bean 3rd pair LD, one of Hanley/Pachal/Barrie sent to be Wranglers top pairing?
Either way though, even without Barrie, I think someone needed to be sent down. Solo makes sense as the Wrangler's top pairing vs the #7 on the Flames (I can see the argument for Bean over Solo). Even if Solo is better than Hanley, the long term development/stagnation risk is worse.
Hell even sign Barrie, with this defense corps and injuries, he'll still play.Don't sign Barrie, let Hanley get waived, keep Solovyov up would be my ideal.
Even if he's #7, theres no way this defense is consistent enough for him to not play. Aside from Andersson and Weegar they all have question marks. Wouldn't be surprised if any of them sit a game or two for another perspective.
Dude he was pretty bad last night and he's been pretty mediocre at camp as is. He hasn't earned a spot at all. I highly doubt he gets claimed as I can't name a single team where he's an upgrade to their current d-core on, that doesn't also have their own Solovyov like player.I don't think I am. I've watched every game of his pro career. Conroy f***ed up.
I think Barrie gets signed and they chose Tinordi over Solo because he's basically a face puncher (more of a punchee if we're honest)