AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 11,523
- 33,734
Yeah it would 100% discount people with significant PK time.Not saying he isn't better than Bratt or Hischier. It's just the context of rate statistics. They tend to be situation-specific, someone like Barkov or Marner would be penalized just looking at all-situations since they are often used in PK situations. Which is why they generally get used as 5v5 or ES to actually extract value from them, rather than all-situations.
Not saying he isn't better than Bratt or Hischier. It's just the context of rate statistics. They tend to be situation-specific, someone like Barkov or Marner would be penalized just looking at all-situations since they are often used in PK situations. Which is why they generally get used as 5v5 or ES to actually extract value from them, rather than all-situations.
I'm not sure how anyone could have Hughes over Draisaitl. Or Eichel over Draisaitl.Yeah for sure.
For me, Hughes is certainly not in the Crosby / McDavid class. But I do have him in the tier below, with guys like Matthews, Mackinnon, and Eichel. When he's healthy, I think he's shown that he has the talent to compete for the top spot of that group.
For centers drafted from 2012 up through 2024, here's how I'd group them up (a lot of emphasis on play driving, defensive game, and ability to matchup in a playoff series):
Generational
McDavid
Elite Franchise centers
Mackinnon
Eichel
Matthews
Barkov
Hughes
Bedard**
Draisaitl
Franchise centers
Carlsson**
Aho
Pettersson
Point
Stutzle
Thompson
Hischier
Legit 1st line centers
Barzal
Larkin
Fantilli**
Celebrini**
Hintz
Cooley**
Thomas
Beniers**
Lambert**
**My personal projections. Could slide up or down a tier depending on development, or even fall off list completely if they never become full time centers.
Here is a complete list of players to score at a higher rate (points/60) than Jack Hughes from ages 20-22 since 2006
Sidney Crosby (3.74)
Connor McDavid (3.89)
Jack Hughes is at 3.6, Ovi and Malkin trail right behind
Then a gap to 3.41 where you get to Pasta and Matthews
100%.Offense is also rather heightened this era.
You actually have to play the games. Then be healthy enough to play in the playoffs and be effective. He's an elite talent but you'd be silly not to be worried about his durability with his size and injury history.Here is a complete list of players to score at a higher rate (points/60) than Jack Hughes from ages 20-22 since 2006
Sidney Crosby (3.74)
Connor McDavid (3.89)
Jack Hughes is at 3.6, Ovi and Malkin trail right behind
Then a gap to 3.41 where you get to Pasta and Matthews
Boats often broken and doesnt play hard defense and doesnt lean on the other team. Not such a cut and dry comparison. Celebrini will be a much better defensive player he wont have the elite ppg production but might actually physically score more points.Obviously it’s impossible to know the answer at this point. I voted Hughes in both counts simply because I think whichever team drafts Celebrini would be thrilled if he became a Hughes-caliber player. As others have pointed out, this seems like a classic boat vs. mystery box scenario.
List of players drafted since 2010 to score more total points in age 20-22 seasons than Jack HughesYou actually have to play the games. Then be healthy enough to play in the playoffs and be effective. He's an elite talent but you'd be silly not to be worried about his durability with his size and injury history.
He still hasnt been able to stay healthy so my point remains. Points also arent everything. I think Marner is a good comparable for him though.List of players drafted since 2010 to score more total points in age 20-22 seasons than Jack Hughes
Connor McDavid: 321
Leon Draisaitl: 252
David Pastrnak: 231
Mitch Marner: 230
Jack Hughes: 229
That may be Celebrini’s projection, but the truth is that we don’t know exactly what he will become. These kinds of projections are often inaccurate. Hence the mystery box comparison.Boats often broken and doesnt play hard defense and doesnt lean on the other team. Not such a cut and dry comparison. Celebrini will be a much better defensive player he wont have the elite ppg production but might actually physically score more points.
Yeah and despite missing all this time and playing through injuries, he STILL has this massive production.He still hasnt been able to stay healthy so my point remains. Points also arent everything. I think Marner is a good comparable for him though.
Yeah the assumption that Celebrini is some guarantee to be an elite level defender is certainly interesting.That may be Celebrini’s projection, but the truth is that we don’t know exactly what he will become. These kinds of projections are often inaccurate. Hence the mystery box comparison.