My Special Purpose
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2008
- 8,151
- 21,787
Honestly other than Haula/Turris/Kilorn/Palat/Johnson, I don't see lot of available options around the league.
I'm sure you're right. Why even try.
Honestly other than Haula/Turris/Kilorn/Palat/Johnson, I don't see lot of available options around the league.
Emotionally it sucks because CDH is a good guy who played hard and pretty well for us.
That being said, as a high-paid member of our defensive group and coming off major surgery he should have understood that a trade was a possibility. This is the NHL, for god's sake. He just saw Rask get traded 18 months into a 6-year contract.
Like I said: the Dundon Era will be tough on the feels.
Nothing personal, Cal. It's business.
Yes, but there aren't much worse things than the lake effect snow drifts in Chicago and the need to shovel driveways for anyone with ****ed up shoulders
This is what he literally signed up for:
11. It is mutually agreed that the Club shall have the right to Assign or to Loan this SPC, and the Player agrees to accept and be bound by such Assignment or Loan, and will faithfully perform and carry out this SPC with the same purpose and effect as if it had been entered into by the Player and such other club.
He uses the snow as an excuse to buy a ****ing luxury garden tractor. The hockey players use their money on mowers and plow.You think an NHL player making $4 million a year is shoveling his own driveway?
Hell I make $50,000 a year and even I can afford to throw a $20 at the kid down the street to take care of that **** for me
He uses the snow as an excuse to buy a ****ing luxury garden tractor. The hockey players use their money on mowers and plow.
Yes. But at the same time, a pro sportsman gets compensated to insane extent for playing for a league where the transferability of the contracts is of essence.It's not so much that it's unethical or anything. It's just one of those things that teams don't generally do. If I was CDH, I'd be frustrated, even if I understood it was a business decision that had to be made.
Yes. But at the same time, a pro sportsman gets compensated to insane extent for playing for a league where the transferability of the contracts is of essence.
I do want to understand the felt ill in forced change in workplace, environment and people you work with but at the same I kind of want to tell him to come pack plastic-coated steel for living while I come play hockey for 5 mil per year.
You know this is the same argument as the Skinner one hit away from retirement discussion right.and he's probably one hard check away from being out all of next year.
So many red flags with a guy like that who has seriously messed up each of his shoulders on separate occasions in such a short time. Given the importance we place on defense, we really can't afford to take that kind of risk in going into next year when we can put that salary to better use and just spend time getting guys like Bean and Fleury ready to play from Day 1
Well to be fair, he’d be at home so it wouldn’t be so bad. He’d at least be able to venture to the southern part of the city without putting on body armor.I feel bad for CDH the man, I really do. It's a tough deal for him.
But it's not like he got sent to Ottawa or something. There are worse things than living/playing in Chicago.
You know this is the same argument as the Skinner one hit away from retirement discussion right.
Fair point, and also a concern I have with this deal. Could mean UFAs are going to be more insistent on NTCs, although most of them already are.Main reason I don’t like the deal. Not a fan of trading a guy a year after he signs a four year deal.
Ok doctor. I’ll defer to you. However, all I’m saying is....he’ll be fine. So will Kevin Durant and so will Klay Thompson. Bodies heal.Actually, surgically reconstructed shoulders are different, and less random, and worse in general. And he's got two of them.
You know this is the same argument as the Skinner one hit away from retirement discussion right.
We didn’t trade him because of the shoulders. Gimme a break. He only has three years left and he isn’t very expensive. We weren’t going to be crushed by the weight of his deal.
We didn’t trade him because of the shoulders. Gimme a break. He only has three years left and he isn’t very expensive. We weren’t going to be crushed by the weight of his deal.
What was my reaction? I didn’t realize I was reacting with passion or vitriol. Or are all reactions different from your own considered a freak out? I get why we did it, I don’t need to make up reasons for it. The rest of us are allowed to have thoughts on the matter. Maybe you’re thinking of one of the others?You are going to need a prescription for Valium if this is your reaction to losing a #4 D-man.
There are other reasons for the trade and they’ve all already been gone over. This injury thing is something only we talk about, that came from us and you never hear it anywhere else.It’s not exactly an outlandish theory that a guy who got traded immediately after major surgery was traded because of injury concerns.
It’s not even the first time this calendar year we’ve seen it happen.
Fair point, and also a concern I have with this deal. Could mean UFAs are going to be more insistent on NTCs, although most of them already are.
There are other reasons for the trade and they’ve all already been gone over. This injury thing is something only we talk about, that came from us and you never hear it anywhere else.
“Well I had a shoulder surgery once and it’s no joke....we should consider the options” has turned into an actual conversation about being the reason. Teams have never hesitated from letting it be known that’s a concern, you always hear rumblings about it. Other than here no one is saying we did it because of that.