I think Marchenko is a "core piece" who I would not trade under any circumstances. I would offer Chinakov instead.
What makes Marchenko a core piece, and not Chinakhov??I think Marchenko is a "core piece" who I would not trade under any circumstances. I would offer Chinakov instead.
He may not meet the definition of “core piece” but Voronkov is a guy I’m not trading unless it’s a Godfather Offer - one I can’t refuse.Fantilli-Chinakhov-Marchenko-Johnson
And Mateychuk, even though some people will say he hasn’t proven anything or isn’t an NHL player…
Should all be looked at essentially all the same. Different players, but, easily all legitimate “core” players moving forward. We have MORE than enough cap space where we would be better off signing a high end UFA or look to make trades using our future 1sts.
What makes Marchenko a core piece, and not Chinakhov??
He may not meet the definition of “core piece” but Voronkov is a guy I’m not trading unless it’s a Godfather Offer - one I can’t refuse.
You’re talking about trading Fantilli or Chinakhov??Controversial but I don't know I'd leave Fantilli's name out if that's what they were asking for. Would push for Chinakhov+ though.
The point is moot, they would never trade Fantilli. I am a little disappointed with how he's started this year though. He's finding his game little by little though.You’re talking about trading Fantilli or Chinakhov??
Controversial isn’t the word…..