Line Combos: CBJ Roster Discussion/Line Combos/Injury Report

[majormajor]

I would be. Evason will care more about the standings than a potential small bump in a trade return

I don't know if Evason will want to disrupt too much by taking Fabbro off the top pairing, which has been phenomenal. I agree on that. But FWIW Werenski-Provorov got the exact same G and xG results. Provorov-Fabbro also looked very good in a few games together, which might be a go to if we see Werenski-Severson as the top pairing.

 

[stevo61]

I don't know if Evason will want to disrupt too much by taking Fabbro off the top pairing, which has been phenomenal. I agree on that. But FWIW Werenski-Provorov got the exact same G and xG results. Provorov-Fabbro also looked very good in a few games together, which might be a go to if we see Werenski-Severson as the top pairing.

I know, but we've seen Evason be stubborn with stuff like this. I'd be shocked to see Fabbro taken away from Z unless something really forces it.

 

[thebus88]

Seriously, show of hands for anybody that ISN’T that impressed with Fabbro….

Thinking he has a positive impact on Werenski playing the way he has, or producing points in the way he has, is ridiculous, IMO. Werenski has looked the same with everyone, Severson included. If anything, Fabbro is holding him back. Fabbro is closer to Jake Christiansen, than he is a “top pairing defenseman”.

Nylander 2.0. On waivers for a reason.