Prospect Info: CBJ Prospect Thread XI

[Xoggz22]

I don't see why we wouldn't want to sign him. By all accounts a good defensive player in college who skates very well. Let's see what he can do in the minors.

Came here to say just that. I really like his game. Not a lot of flash but not devoid of skill and solid in all aspects. I think his game translates well. Then again, I've been voting him a lot earlier in our prospect rankings than most so maybe I'm just trying to will it to happen.

 

[Doggy]

Mon Dec 30: Luca Del Bel Belluz with three assists

And Jet stopped 33 of 34

 

[SteelCityCannon]

Ridiculous pass by LDBB

 

[MoeBartoli]

LDBB is looking like he could be a great second round pick. This guys not a smurf like some who can score in the AHL but not duplicate it in the NHL.

 

[CBJWerenski8]

 

[majormajor]

I think you have to separate the Lindstrom pick from the trade idea. The top 5 picks this year are not better than the players available in the top 5 last year, even a 1st OA this year might not be better than say, Demidov or Buium. We don't know yet, and there's no obvious guy this year who is miles better than that group of players. So in that trade we would be delaying by a year, possibly getting a worse draft, and possibly getting a worse pick (if Chicago loads up more and finishes higher in the standings, being without a 1st). It was simply put, a bad trade for the Jackets.

The Lindstrom thing we'll have to see. I don't know if the doctors we hired feel good about what they said about Lindstrom's back. Maybe they actually do, we don't know how his recovery is going right now.

 

[Jovavic]

Hawks must really be sold on the defenseman they took second otherwise why not just pick whoever they wanted at fourth (probably Demidov) at that spot?

 

[Aaaarrgghh]

Hawks must really be sold on the defenseman they took second otherwise why not just pick whoever they wanted at fourth (probably Demidov) at that spot?

It was reported at the time that they had a hard time deciding between Levshunov and Demidov. They saw an opportunity to get both.

 

[alphafox]

I think you have to separate the Lindstrom pick from the trade idea. The top 5 picks this year are not better than the players available in the top 5 last year, even a 1st OA this year might not be better than say, Demidov or Buium. We don't know yet, and there's no obvious guy this year who is miles better than that group of players. So in that trade we would be delaying by a year, possibly getting a worse draft, and possibly getting a worse pick (if Chicago loads up more and finishes higher in the standings, being without a 1st). It was simply put, a bad trade for the Jackets.

The Lindstrom thing we'll have to see. I don't know if the doctors we hired feel good about what they said about Lindstrom's back. Maybe they actually do, we don't know how his recovery is going right now.

I disagree with most of this. This draft is overall weaker, but I would say the top 7 is at least comparable to last year. This year is also filled with more of what we need with Centers and left wing more present (although as it turns out with Jircek flopping we needed D more last year).

Unfortunately hindsight is 20/20 and that is what makes the deal so much more attractive now. Jiricek's flameout here weakens the blueline's future quite a bit, KJ's breakout & the Russian's improvement dramatically improved scoring, Lindstrom's injury and doubtful future and the death of JG have all dramatically changed what position we are in and what we needed last year versus this year from a draft.

 

[cbjthrowaway]

The Lindstrom thing we'll have to see. I don't know if the doctors we hired feel good about what they said about Lindstrom's back. Maybe they actually do, we don't know how his recovery is going right now.

I disagree with most of this. This draft is overall weaker, but I would say the top 7 is at least comparable to last year.

if lindstrom's recovery goes well i would put him above everyone in this year's class except maybe schaefer. i think he'll have a longer journey to the NHL than a lot of other top-five picks given that he just started playing center last year and then lost time to injury, but he checks every single box that i look for in a 1C.

 

[alphafox]

if lindstrom's recovery goes well i would put him above everyone in this year's class except maybe schaefer. i think he'll have a longer journey to the NHL than a lot of other top-five picks given that he just started playing center last year and then lost time to injury, but he checks every single box that i look for in a 1C.

I would rank him as the following ignoring injury, but I think the 4-6 have the potential to be better but lack the physical tools or positional value to go above Lindstrom.

1. Hagens
2. Schaefer
3. Lindstrom
4. Misa
5. Frondell
6. Martone

 

[cbjthrowaway]

I would rank him as the following ignoring injury, but I think the 4-6 have the potential to be better but lack the physical tools or positional value to go above Lindstrom.

1. Hagens
2. Schaefer
3. Lindstrom
4. Misa
5. Frondell
6. Martone

to me, lindstrom is a unicorn prospect. the total package is ridiculous. size, smarts, skating, snarl, shooting… he has it all. i don't think he has the same god-tier hands and hockey sense that a guy like sasha barkov has, but he's going to be a two-way force in his prime.

no disrespect whatsoever to hagens, who i think will be a higher scorer than lindstrom and a possession monster as well. i just see lindstrom as having more impact on the game, especially in a postseason setting, given his strength and two-way game.

i'm more of a martone guy than hagens too, because he has some of those same elements (skilled power forward game) but the skating isn't nearly on lindstrom's level.

 

[Nanabijou]

I would rank him as the following ignoring injury, but I think the 4-6 have the potential to be better but lack the physical tools or positional value to go above Lindstrom.

1. Hagens
2. Schaefer
3. Lindstrom
4. Misa
5. Frondell
6. Martone

Agreed. I would definitely trade Lindstrom straight up for Hagens or Schaefer today, and I would give the other 3 a lot of thought.

 

[majormajor]

I disagree with most of this. This draft is overall weaker, but I would say the top 7 is at least comparable to last year. This year is also filled with more of what we need with Centers and left wing more present (although as it turns out with Jircek flopping we needed D more last year).

Unfortunately hindsight is 20/20 and that is what makes the deal so much more attractive now. Jiricek's flameout here weakens the blueline's future quite a bit, KJ's breakout & the Russian's improvement dramatically improved scoring, Lindstrom's injury and doubtful future and the death of JG have all dramatically changed what position we are in and what we needed last year versus this year from a draft.

I don't think your hindsight is 20/20.

We're not a team that should be focusing on need, we have well balanced organizational depth and what we're really looking for is special players who can put us over the top.

If Lindstrom returns to health then he is my clear preference (or I would have taken Demidov or Buium, who I ranked ahead). Trading that pick for a mystery box a year later would likely be a straight up loss.