I guess this is a too complicated and foreign concept for most fans, but it's possible to think simultaneously that:
- nepotism is wrong
- nepotism seems to exist within the org
- Nash seems to be a beneficiary of it and has achieved his current role at least partially for wrong reasons
- Nash might be good at what he does and will be given a chance to show it
I'm not very confident in Nash as an exec but I'm not sure this is nepotism, even by your definition which allows that he might be good at his job.
He's spent more time working his way up from the bottom than the former player GMs that I'm familiar with. Guys like Sakic and Yzerman went straight to the top group of execs - meanwhile we had Nash getting coffees and helping B prospects for a couple years and he's still not at the top. I couldn't tell you how Briere, Conroy, or Guerin started in FOs. I know Staios is literally the owners friend.
Should we just have a rule against hiring former star players? That would have kept the Avs from hiring Sakic.