I'm not sure how sustainable his 31% shooting percentage is this year, but I'm here for it.
Well, he's not going to score 73 goals.
But as someone else mentioned, he had an ridiculously low shooting% last year and sometimes things find a way of evening out.
If he had shot last year what he shot the year before (16.5%) he would have scored 52 goals, and my guess is that he probably ends up with around that many this season (if he stays healthy). Just very few players with the combo of skill and smarts he possesses.
I've been adding to the discussion, you just don't like the addition.
Flexing the "mod" muscles is hilarious here, should just move the thread to the Montreal board.
Here is some stats about Caufield so you can be happy.
Caufield has some bad play driving stats and is getting caved in at 5v5.
He's currently shooting at ~2 goals above expected.
He should likely be closer to 6 in 9 which is still a good number, but really not that impressive.
Congrats for the early success Caufield and Montreal.
The old "play driving" stuff. What does it matter, he's not a play-driver. This would be like criticizing a homerun hitters defense or batting average. Are you old enough to remember Brett Hull? He wasn't a "play-driver" either, he was paid to find space in the offensive zone and pump the opposing teams net full of goals. If Caufield hits his ceiling he has a chance to be a similar player.
To often on this forum people just hyper-focus on what players can't do and don't focus enough on extraordinary talents that players have. That is why "well rounded" players who can't shoot a puck into the ocean are beloved and offensive players are not.
The same thing happened on this forum with Quinn Hughes, lets ignore his world-class skating and off-the-charts offensive zone IQ and ability and focus instead on his shortcomings.
Never made much sense to me, but it's been the case on this forum for 20 years.